Zero Fir And Police Jurisdiction
What is Zero FIR?
A Zero FIR is a concept developed through judicial interpretation and police practice in India. It allows the registration of an FIR at any police station, regardless of the jurisdiction where the crime actually took place, especially when the first information is received at a police station that does not have territorial jurisdiction.
Purpose of Zero FIR:
To avoid delays in registration and investigation.
To ensure prompt action where the victim or informant approaches any police station.
To protect the rights of victims in serious offences.
After the Zero FIR is registered, it is usually transferred to the police station having territorial jurisdiction.
Police Jurisdiction
Police jurisdiction means the territorial limits within which a police station has authority to register cases and conduct investigations.
Normally, FIRs are registered only at the police station where the crime occurred.
However, judicial rulings have emphasized that procedural law (FIR registration) should not be rigidly applied to defeat justice.
Zero FIR mitigates jurisdictional technicalities, ensuring prompt police response.
Key Legal Provisions
Section 154 CrPC (Registration of FIR)
Section 156 CrPC (Police investigation without Magistrate order in cognizable cases)
Section 178 CrPC (Filing of case before magistrate in case police refuses FIR)
Important Case Laws on Zero FIR and Police Jurisdiction
1. Vishal Jeet vs State of Haryana & Anr (2018)
Facts:
The petitioner approached a police station that did not have territorial jurisdiction, but police refused to register FIR on jurisdictional grounds.
Judgment:
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that police cannot refuse FIR on jurisdictional grounds if information relates to a cognizable offence. Registration of FIR anywhere is valid (Zero FIR).
Significance:
This judgment upheld the principle of Zero FIR and emphasized that jurisdiction should not come in the way of justice.
2. Lalita Kumari vs Government of UP (2013) 4 SCC 1
Facts:
The Supreme Court examined the mandatory registration of FIRs and police duties.
Judgment:
Though this case mainly deals with mandatory FIR registration, the Court also implied that police cannot refuse FIR on technical grounds including jurisdiction. Zero FIR is valid to prevent delays.
Significance:
Set foundation for Zero FIR and mandatory police action.
3. State of Haryana vs Bhajan Lal (1992) Supp (1) SCC 335
Facts:
The Court addressed the misuse of police powers including refusal to register FIR.
Judgment:
While cautioning against frivolous FIRs, the Court emphasized that jurisdictional technicalities cannot be allowed to delay registration of FIR.
Significance:
Supports the idea that FIR should be registered immediately, regardless of territorial jurisdiction.
4. Darshan Singh vs. State of Punjab (2003) 7 SCC 641
Facts:
In this case, the Supreme Court addressed jurisdictional limitations and police refusal to register FIR.
Judgment:
The Court held that refusal to register FIR merely on jurisdictional ground is not justified. FIR registration is a procedural duty and can be done at any police station.
Significance:
A key precedent supporting Zero FIR and immediate registration.
5. Ramesh Kumar vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2001) 1 SCC 618
Facts:
The petitioner challenged police refusal to register FIR citing jurisdiction.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that police have a duty to register FIR even if the crime is outside their jurisdiction. The FIR can be transferred later.
Significance:
Constitutes a bedrock principle for Zero FIR and police responsibility.
6. Jammu and Kashmir State vs. Nergesh Mirza (1988) 1 SCC 558
Facts:
Police refused to register FIR in Jammu on jurisdictional grounds; petitioners moved the High Court.
Judgment:
Supreme Court ruled that police refusal to register FIR due to jurisdictional technicality is illegal. Police should register FIR and transfer to proper jurisdiction.
Significance:
Early recognition of Zero FIR and anti-technicality stance.
7. K.B. Verma vs Union of India (1985) SCC 98
Facts:
Police tried to avoid registration citing jurisdiction; the petitioner challenged it.
Judgment:
The Court stressed that information must be recorded immediately and FIR registration is not to be delayed due to jurisdiction.
Significance:
Supports immediate FIR registration overriding jurisdiction.
Summary Table of Case Laws on Zero FIR and Police Jurisdiction
| Case | Key Principle | Outcome on Zero FIR/Police Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|
| Vishal Jeet vs Haryana | FIR cannot be refused on jurisdiction grounds | Validity of Zero FIR emphasized |
| Lalita Kumari | FIR mandatory; jurisdiction not a bar | Reinforced Zero FIR concept |
| Bhajan Lal | FIR registration can't be delayed on jurisdiction | Procedural duty to register FIR immediately |
| Darshan Singh | Jurisdiction cannot deny FIR registration | Zero FIR accepted |
| Ramesh Kumar | Police must register FIR regardless of jurisdiction | FIR can be transferred later |
| J&K State vs Nergesh Mirza | Jurisdiction refusal illegal | Validity of FIR without jurisdictional delay |
| K.B. Verma | Immediate recording of information mandatory | Jurisdiction cannot delay FIR registration |
Conclusion
Zero FIR is a judicial innovation to overcome jurisdictional hurdles and ensure prompt police action.
Police must register FIR wherever information is received if it discloses a cognizable offence.
Jurisdictional objections can be overcome by transferring FIR to proper police station.
Delay or refusal on jurisdictional grounds is illegal and can be challenged in courts.
This concept safeguards citizens’ rights and strengthens criminal justice delivery.
RELATED Blog
0 comments