Ico Fraud Landmark Prosecutions
πΉ What is ICO Fraud?
An Initial Coin Offering (ICO) is a fundraising mechanism in which cryptocurrency tokens are sold to investors. ICO fraud occurs when developers mislead investors about the nature of the project, misuse funds, or fail to deliver the promised services or tokens.
These cases often involve charges like:
Securities fraud
Wire fraud
Money laundering
False representations
1. United States v. Maksim Zaslavskiy (REcoin and Diamond ICOs)
π Facts:
In 2017, Zaslavskiy launched two ICOs β REcoin (real estate-backed cryptocurrency) and Diamond Reserve Club (allegedly backed by diamonds). He falsely claimed both tokens were backed by real assets, but no such assets existed.
βοΈ Legal Issues:
Charged with securities fraud and wire fraud.
The court had to determine whether the ICO tokens constituted βsecuritiesβ under the Howey Test (from SEC v. W.J. Howey Co.).
This was one of the first federal cases to test U.S. securities law against ICOs.
β Outcome:
Zaslavskiy pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 18 months in prison.
Court confirmed that some ICOs may qualify as investment contracts and are thus subject to securities laws.
π Significance:
This case set precedent that ICOs could be considered securities offerings.
Established that fraud in crypto fundraising would be treated the same as traditional securities fraud.
2. SEC v. Telegram Group Inc. (TON Token ICO)
π Facts:
Telegram raised $1.7 billion from investors through the sale of Grams tokens via a private ICO in 2018. The SEC alleged this was an unregistered securities offering.
βοΈ Legal Issues:
The SEC applied the Howey Test to argue that Grams were investment contracts.
Telegram claimed that it sold tokens under Regulation D exemptions for private offerings.
β Outcome:
The court granted a preliminary injunction blocking the distribution of Grams.
Telegram agreed to return over $1.2 billion to investors and pay an $18.5 million fine.
The TON blockchain project was ultimately abandoned.
π Significance:
Major case affirming that private ICOs can still fall under SEC jurisdiction if resold to the public.
Reinforced the SEC's commitment to policing unregistered ICOs, even by major tech firms.
3. United States v. Centra Tech Inc. (2018)
π Facts:
Centra Tech claimed to offer a crypto debit card backed by Visa and Mastercard. Founders Sohrab Sharma, Robert Farkas, and Raymond Trapani raised $25 million from investors via an ICO based on false claims about business partnerships.
βοΈ Legal Issues:
Charged with securities fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy.
The SEC and DOJ both pursued civil and criminal charges.
Celebrities Floyd Mayweather and DJ Khaled, who promoted the ICO, were later fined for failing to disclose payments.
β Outcome:
All three founders were convicted or pleaded guilty.
Sharma received 8 years in prison, and Farkas and Trapani received shorter terms.
Over $100 million in crypto assets were seized and returned to investors.
π Significance:
One of the first high-profile criminal prosecutions of ICO fraud.
Introduced celebrity endorsement liability under securities law.
4. United States v. Michael Stollery (Titanium Blockchain Infrastructure Services, 2018)
π Facts:
Stollery, CEO of Titanium Blockchain, conducted a fraudulent ICO that raised $21 million, falsely claiming business relationships with companies like Apple, IBM, and PayPal.
βοΈ Legal Issues:
Charged with securities fraud and wire fraud.
Falsely marketed the ICO as a legitimate investment using forged testimonials and logos.
β Outcome:
Stollery pleaded guilty to securities fraud.
The court ordered the return of investor funds and imposed penalties.
π Significance:
Reinforced legal accountability for misleading marketing materials in ICOs.
Strengthened regulatory oversight of crypto promotion tactics.
5. SEC v. Kik Interactive Inc. (Kin Token, 2019)
π Facts:
Kik raised $100 million through an ICO of its Kin token in 2017. The SEC alleged this was an unregistered securities offering.
βοΈ Legal Issues:
Kik argued that Kin was not a security, but a currency.
The court applied the Howey Test and found the offering met all elements of an investment contract.
β Outcome:
Kik was ordered to pay a $5 million penalty and to notify investors.
The Kin token remains active but under a different ecosystem.
π Significance:
Confirmed that even utility tokens can be securities if marketed for profit expectations.
Set important precedent for evaluating "economic reality" over token label.
6. SEC v. BitConnect Promoters (2021)
π Facts:
BitConnect was a massive crypto lending and ICO-based Ponzi scheme that collapsed in 2018. The SEC targeted promoters who misled investors about guaranteed high returns.
βοΈ Legal Issues:
Charged with fraud, selling unregistered securities, and misrepresentation.
The SEC argued promoters were liable for false advertising and profit guarantees.
β Outcome:
Promoters were fined and banned from future securities offerings.
BitConnectβs U.S. promoter, Glenn Arcaro, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 38 months in prison.
Over $57 million was seized for restitution.
π Significance:
Demonstrated that ICO promotion alone can carry legal consequences.
Showed that pyramid and Ponzi schemes using ICOs will be prosecuted like traditional scams.
7. SEC v. Block.one (EOS ICO, 2019)
π Facts:
Block.one conducted an ICO that raised over $4 billion to fund the EOS blockchain platform. The SEC alleged the ICO violated registration requirements.
βοΈ Legal Issues:
Block.one was accused of offering unregistered securities.
No allegations of fraud, but the SEC pursued registration violations.
β Outcome:
Block.one settled, agreeing to pay a $24 million penalty β a small fraction of the funds raised.
They did not admit or deny wrongdoing.
π Significance:
Criticized for the light penalty relative to the ICO size.
Still demonstrated that SEC registration rules apply regardless of project success.
π Key Legal Themes from These Cases:
| Legal Issue | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Securities Law (Howey Test) | Courts assess if tokens are investment contracts based on: (1) investment of money, (2) in a common enterprise, (3) with an expectation of profits, (4) from others' efforts. |
| Unregistered Offerings | ICOs must comply with SEC registration requirements unless exempt. |
| Fraud & Misrepresentation | Misleading statements about partnerships, technology, or expected returns can lead to criminal charges. |
| Promotion Liability | Promoters (even celebrities) can be liable if they fail to disclose compensation or mislead investors. |
| Asset Forfeiture & Investor Restitution | Courts often order seizure of crypto assets for restitution to victims. |
RELATED Blog
0 comments