Forensic Evidence: Dna And Fingerprint Analysis
1. Forensic DNA Analysis
Definition & Importance:
DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) evidence is genetic material unique to every individual (except identical twins). DNA analysis in forensic investigations helps link a suspect to a crime scene, victim, or object. The accuracy of DNA evidence has made it a critical tool in criminal investigations, exonerations, and conviction.
Types of DNA Evidence:
Nuclear DNA: Found in the nucleus of cells; highly individualized.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Inherited maternally; useful when nuclear DNA is degraded.
Touch DNA: DNA left on objects through skin contact.
Key Case Laws:
Case 1: State of Uttar Pradesh vs Rajesh Gautam (India, 2006)
Facts: Rajesh was accused of sexual assault. Biological samples were collected from the victim and the crime scene.
DNA Evidence: DNA analysis of semen matched the accused.
Outcome: DNA evidence was pivotal; court convicted the accused.
Significance: Established the reliability of DNA evidence in sexual assault cases in India.
Case 2: People vs. Wesley Allan Dodd (USA, 1989)
Facts: Dodd was a serial killer; biological evidence was collected from multiple victims.
DNA Evidence: DNA tests confirmed his involvement in multiple murders.
Outcome: Conviction was secured; Dodd was sentenced to death.
Significance: One of the first cases in the USA using DNA profiling to link multiple crimes to a single perpetrator.
Case 3: R v. Adams (UK, 1996)
Facts: Accused of sexual assault; defense challenged the DNA evidence, claiming contamination.
DNA Evidence: DNA profiling confirmed the accused’s semen was on the victim.
Outcome: Court ruled DNA evidence admissible, convicting the accused.
Significance: Reinforced standards for DNA collection and handling to avoid contamination.
Case 4: State of Tamil Nadu vs. Rajkumar (India, 2007)
Facts: Accused charged with murder; crime scene had minimal physical evidence.
DNA Evidence: Touch DNA recovered from weapon matched accused.
Outcome: Court upheld conviction based primarily on DNA evidence.
Significance: Showed that even minimal DNA traces can be used to establish guilt.
Case 5: People of State of California vs. O.J. Simpson (USA, 1995)
Facts: High-profile murder case of Nicole Brown Simpson.
DNA Evidence: Blood from crime scene and car matched Simpson.
Outcome: Although acquitted in criminal court due to procedural flaws, DNA evidence became a major focus in forensic science history.
Significance: Highlighted the importance of proper DNA evidence handling to avoid disputes in court.
2. Fingerprint Analysis
Definition & Importance:
Fingerprints are unique ridge patterns on human fingers. Forensic fingerprint analysis identifies individuals through:
Latent Prints: Invisible prints left on surfaces.
Patent Prints: Visible prints, e.g., ink or blood.
Plastic Prints: Impressions in soft material like wax or clay.
Key Principles:
Uniqueness of fingerprints: No two people have identical patterns.
Persistence: Fingerprint patterns do not change over a person’s lifetime.
Key Case Laws:
Case 6: Mohan Lal vs State of Punjab (India, 2005)
Facts: Accused involved in robbery; fingerprints found at the scene.
Fingerprint Evidence: Latent prints matched the accused.
Outcome: Court convicted the accused.
Significance: Fingerprint evidence alone can be sufficient for conviction when properly documented.
Case 7: State vs. Michael Taylor (UK, 1998)
Facts: Accused charged with burglary.
Fingerprint Evidence: Latent prints on window matched Taylor.
Outcome: Conviction based on fingerprint analysis.
Significance: Established best practices for fingerprint collection in burglary cases.
Case 8: R v. Henry (Australia, 2003)
Facts: Murder case; fingerprints found on weapon.
Fingerprint Evidence: Clear match with the accused’s prints.
Outcome: Conviction was upheld.
Significance: Demonstrated global recognition of fingerprint reliability in serious criminal cases.
Case 9: State of Maharashtra vs. Kishore (India, 2008)
Facts: Accused of theft; fingerprints lifted from crime scene.
Fingerprint Evidence: Prints conclusively matched the accused.
Outcome: Conviction confirmed.
Significance: Reinforced that fingerprints are admissible and reliable under Indian Evidence Act provisions.
Case 10: People vs. Jennings (USA, 1992)
Facts: Accused in armed robbery; prints recovered from getaway car.
Fingerprint Evidence: Matched Jennings; evidence uncontested.
Outcome: Conviction secured.
Significance: Highlighted the importance of chain-of-custody in fingerprint analysis.
3. Summary of Forensic Evidence Impact
Reliability: DNA and fingerprints are scientifically proven, highly reliable forms of evidence.
Legal Acceptance: Courts worldwide, including India, USA, UK, and Australia, accept these as admissible evidence.
Role in Justice: They can secure convictions, exonerate the innocent, and reinforce investigative accuracy.
Critical Factors: Proper collection, storage, and handling are crucial to maintain evidence integrity.
RELATED Blog
0 comments