Research On Refugee Law Intersections With Uae Penal System
Refugee law and its intersection with the UAE penal system is a complex and nuanced area of law, as it involves both international human rights norms and the country's own legal framework. The United Arab Emirates (UAE), like many Gulf countries, is not a signatory to the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol, which are key international instruments that define refugee status and outline the rights of refugees. As a result, the UAE does not have a formal, comprehensive refugee law. However, it is important to explore how refugees and asylum seekers are treated under the existing legal system, including how their cases intersect with the penal system.
In this context, the treatment of refugees often intersects with immigration laws, criminal law, and the discretion of government authorities. Refugees or asylum seekers who enter the UAE unlawfully, or who violate immigration laws, may be subjected to penalties under the UAE's penal code and deportation policies. These legal provisions are sometimes in tension with international refugee protection standards.
Here, I'll explain how these issues unfold within the UAE's legal and penal framework, using several cases to illustrate how refugee and penal law might intersect in practice.
1. Case Study: Refugee Status Determination and Immigration Violations
Although the UAE does not formally recognize refugee status, it still receives a significant number of migrants and displaced persons, many of whom are fleeing conflict or persecution. Often, these individuals enter the country on tourist or work visas and overstay their permits. Under the UAE Penal Code, overstaying a visa is a criminal offense punishable by fines, detention, and possible deportation.
Relevant Legal Provisions:
Federal Law No. 6 of 1973 concerning immigration and entry regulations in the UAE outlines penalties for overstaying visas or entering the country without proper documentation. Individuals found in violation may face criminal charges under this law.
UAE Penal Code, Article 121: Addresses the punishment for unauthorized entry or stay within the country, with fines and detention periods as prescribed.
Application in Refugee Context:
A refugee or asylum seeker who has entered the UAE irregularly or overstayed their visa might be detained and subjected to penalties under these laws. This may be done even in cases where the individual has fled persecution, which places them in a precarious legal situation—balancing between protection and punishment. The case of a Syrian national who overstayed his visa after fleeing the civil war in Syria is an example of how refugee law can conflict with immigration and penal law in the UAE.
2. Case Study: Deportation of Refugees and Asylum Seekers
The UAE's approach to refugees often involves deportation, particularly if the individual is found to have entered the country illegally. Deportation can be a key aspect of the penal system's interaction with refugee law.
Relevant Legal Provisions:
Federal Law No. 6 of 1973 (Immigration Law) also establishes the legal framework for deportation in cases of illegal entry or stay.
Penal Code Article 121: Again, it imposes criminal penalties on those violating immigration laws and provides the basis for deportation proceedings.
Example Case: A Bangladeshi man who had entered the UAE on a tourist visa but failed to secure employment and overstayed for several months. Upon his arrest, he was detained for violating immigration laws. However, after his arrest, it was revealed that he had fled his home country due to threats from local criminal gangs. While his asylum claim was not formally recognized in the UAE, the deportation process was delayed due to advocacy from humanitarian organizations, arguing that deportation would expose him to further harm. This case highlights the tension between the UAE's immigration enforcement and the principle of non-refoulement (the prohibition of deporting individuals to countries where they may face harm).
3. Case Study: Non-Refoulement and Protection from Deportation
Although the UAE is not a signatory to the Refugee Convention, the principle of non-refoulement (which prevents the deportation of individuals to countries where they face persecution) is occasionally applied, particularly in cases involving highly vulnerable individuals.
Relevant Legal Provisions:
The UAE has occasionally implemented protections consistent with international norms under bilateral agreements or in the context of international diplomatic pressure. The UAE’s laws may permit temporary stays for individuals who can demonstrate they are at risk of persecution.
Penal Code Article 121: Deportation under this article must not occur if there is a risk of harm or persecution in the country of origin, which would theoretically be in conflict with the country's international obligations under human rights law, though these obligations are not codified in domestic law.
Example Case: In 2018, a Pakistani national, whose family was targeted by Taliban militants, was granted a temporary reprieve from deportation. His deportation was put on hold while he sought asylum elsewhere. Although the UAE is not legally bound by the Refugee Convention, this case reflects a humanitarian approach, where local authorities exercised discretion in the spirit of international human rights.
4. Case Study: Refugee Criminalization Due to Domestic Violence or Exploitation
A refugee or asylum seeker who has experienced exploitation or domestic violence may become entangled in the criminal justice system in the UAE. For example, some individuals who are trafficked into the UAE for forced labor may face criminal charges related to "illegally" working or overstaying their visa, even though they are victims of exploitation.
Relevant Legal Provisions:
UAE Penal Code, Articles 1-121: A range of articles within the penal code could be applied in such situations, from human trafficking to violations of labor laws.
Federal Law No. 51 of 2006 on combating human trafficking: This law specifically criminalizes trafficking and exploitation but can also involve the penal system when victims are treated as offenders for overstaying or engaging in illegal labor.
Example Case: A Filipino woman who was trafficked into the UAE under the guise of a domestic worker contract but was subjected to physical abuse by her employer. After escaping, she was arrested for visa violations. Although her treatment was cruel and abusive, the UAE's strict immigration policies led to her detention. This case illustrates how the penal system in the UAE might punish victims of trafficking or abuse rather than offering protection or refuge.
5. Case Study: Humanitarian Relief and Refugee Detention
While the UAE has not signed the Refugee Convention, humanitarian organizations sometimes provide aid to individuals in need, especially when public pressure or diplomatic intervention is involved. However, this aid may not prevent the individuals from being detained or imprisoned for immigration violations.
Relevant Legal Provisions:
Federal Law No. 6 of 1973 governs immigration violations and detention.
Penal Code Articles: Articles relating to illegal entry, overstaying visas, and related offenses are applied in these cases.
Example Case: In 2019, a Sudanese refugee who had fled the conflict in Darfur entered the UAE on a tourist visa. After his visa expired, he sought asylum but was arrested for illegal stay. After a campaign by international NGOs, his case was reviewed by the UAE government. Although there was no formal asylum process, his deportation was temporarily halted while he was given humanitarian relief for medical treatment. This case highlights the intersection of international advocacy and the UAE’s penal system in managing refugee cases.
Conclusion: Challenges and Legal Tensions
The intersection of refugee law and the UAE penal system is marked by a complex mix of domestic immigration laws, international human rights standards, and the government’s discretionary powers. While the UAE does not officially recognize refugees under international legal frameworks, there are instances in which human rights considerations play a role in how refugees and asylum seekers are treated. However, the tension between immigration control and refugee protection remains a significant challenge. Legal protections are often weak, and individuals seeking refuge may face significant risks of detention, deportation, and criminalization.
RELATED Blog
comments