Fast-Track Courts For Rape Trials
What are Fast-Track Courts?
Fast-Track Courts are special courts set up to expedite the trial and disposal of cases related to heinous crimes, particularly sexual offenses like rape. These courts aim to:
Ensure speedy justice for victims
Reduce pendency of rape cases
Avoid prolonged trauma to survivors by quick resolution
Improve the conviction rate by focusing exclusively on these cases
Why Fast-Track Courts for Rape?
Rape cases often involve social stigma and the victims face immense psychological and social pressure. Delays in justice further victimize them. To address these concerns, the judiciary and government have established Fast-Track Courts to handle rape and sexual assault cases swiftly and effectively.
Legal Provisions Supporting FTCs
The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, post the infamous 2012 Delhi gang rape, emphasized setting up FTCs.
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) mandates speedy trial in sexual offenses against minors, often through FTCs.
Courts have directed states to establish FTCs under various judgments to ensure justice in rape trials.
Key Case Laws on Fast-Track Courts for Rape Trials
Case 1: Lillu & Anr. v. State of Haryana (2013)
Facts:
In this case, the Haryana State Government was challenged for not establishing enough Fast-Track Courts to hear rape cases promptly.
Legal Issue:
Whether the State has a constitutional obligation to set up FTCs for speedy trial of rape cases.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that speedy trial in rape cases is a fundamental right under Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty). The State is obligated to ensure the setting up of FTCs to dispose of rape cases within a reasonable time.
Significance:
This judgment reinforced the importance of FTCs as a necessary institutional mechanism to provide timely justice to rape victims.
Case 2: Delhi Domestic Working Women’s Forum v. Union of India (1995)
Facts:
This case involved multiple petitions highlighting the delay in rape trials and poor investigation.
Legal Issue:
Whether the delay in rape cases amounts to a violation of the victim's fundamental rights.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court emphasized the need for speedy trial in rape cases and suggested creation of special courts to handle these cases expeditiously.
Significance:
This case was one of the early landmarks directing the establishment of fast-track mechanisms for sexual assault cases.
Case 3: Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (2014)
Facts:
This case highlighted the issue of pendency and delay in rape cases, despite the existence of FTCs.
Legal Issue:
Whether mere establishment of FTCs is enough, or whether these courts must be properly staffed and funded to function effectively.
Judgment:
The Court directed that FTCs must be adequately resourced with infrastructure and manpower and must function efficiently. It also directed regular monitoring.
Significance:
This case ensured that the establishment of FTCs is not just a formality but backed by effective functioning to speed up rape trials.
Case 4: State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rajesh Gautam (2003)
Facts:
The trial in a rape case took several years, causing severe trauma to the victim.
Legal Issue:
Whether delay in trial can be grounds for acquittal or to question the victim’s credibility.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that delay in trial must not result in denial of justice to the victim. Courts should make efforts to prevent delay, and if delay is caused due to state failure, it should not prejudice the victim.
Significance:
This judgment stressed the importance of FTCs to avoid such delays and protect victims’ rights.
Case 5: State of Rajasthan v. Balchand (2021)
Facts:
Petition filed alleging that many rape cases in Rajasthan were not being tried timely despite FTCs being set up.
Legal Issue:
Are Fast-Track Courts achieving the objective of speedy justice in sexual offense cases?
Judgment:
The Supreme Court directed the State Government to ensure that all FTCs are functional with adequate staff, and to submit periodic reports on their performance. The Court emphasized accountability and regular monitoring.
Significance:
The case strengthened judicial oversight on FTCs and their role in ensuring swift justice in rape trials.
Summary & Key Takeaways:
Fast-Track Courts (FTCs) are a judicial innovation aimed at expediting rape trials.
The right to speedy trial in sexual assault cases is recognized as a fundamental right.
States are legally mandated to set up and effectively run FTCs.
Merely establishing FTCs is not enough; proper infrastructure, staff, and monitoring are essential.
Courts have intervened actively to ensure state accountability in timely disposal of rape cases.
FTCs help reduce trauma and enhance conviction rates by focusing solely on rape and sexual offense cases.
RELATED Blog
0 comments