Criminal Justice Machinery Being Misused By Certain Persons; Courts Must Stay Vigilant: SC
Criminal Justice Machinery Being Misused by Certain Persons; Courts Must Stay Vigilant
Overview
The criminal justice system is designed to deliver justice by investigating, prosecuting, and punishing offenders while safeguarding the rights of the accused. However, over time, courts have noted that this machinery is sometimes misused by certain individuals or groups for ulterior motives, such as personal vendettas, political gains, or to harass opponents. Recognizing this misuse, the Supreme Court of India has repeatedly emphasized the need for the judiciary to remain vigilant to ensure that the criminal justice system is not weaponized unjustly.
Key Themes in the Supreme Court's Observations
Misuse of Legal Process as a Tool for Harassment
The Court has acknowledged that filing false or frivolous criminal complaints, often under non-bailable or serious sections, is a tactic used to harass or intimidate individuals, especially in matters involving civil disputes, business rivalries, or political battles.
Need for Preliminary Scrutiny by Courts
To prevent abuse, courts have advocated for a thorough and cautious approach before taking cognizance of complaints or allowing the investigation to proceed, especially in cases based on unverified allegations.
Balance Between Rights of Accused and Complainant
Courts have stressed the importance of protecting the rights of the accused from arbitrary or mala fide prosecution, while ensuring that genuine victims get their due justice.
Judicial Restraint and Discretion
Judges are encouraged to exercise discretion to filter out baseless cases early in the process, including by quashing FIRs or directing investigations to be more focused and fair.
Important Supreme Court Judgments on Misuse of Criminal Justice Machinery
1. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, AIR 1992 SC 604
This landmark judgment laid down guidelines to prevent abuse of the criminal process. The Supreme Court specified conditions under which a court can quash an FIR or criminal proceedings:
Where the allegations are false or frivolous.
Where the allegations, even if taken at face value, do not constitute any offense.
Where the FIR is used as a tool of harassment.
Where the complaint is maliciously motivated.
Significance: This case empowers courts to intervene early to protect individuals from unnecessary harassment.
2. Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. CBI, AIR 2013 SC 2525
The Court highlighted the importance of preliminary inquiry and noted that investigation should not be conducted based solely on mere allegations, especially when the complaint appears to be an abuse of process.
Significance: The ruling reinforces that courts must ensure investigations are not initiated based on motivated or baseless complaints.
3. In Re: the Delhi Anti-Liquor Prohibition Case (2014) (Special Leave Petition (C) No. 10739/2013)
The Court observed that the criminal law should not be used as a weapon for private revenge and emphasized that courts must exercise caution before permitting continuation of criminal cases which appear to be motivated or vexatious.
4. S.P. Gupta v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 149
While primarily about judicial independence, this judgment also recognized the need to keep criminal investigations and prosecutions free from misuse or arbitrary exercise of power.
5. K.K. Verma v. Union of India, AIR 1965 SC 845
The Court stressed that criminal law is not a weapon to be used for settling personal scores and must not be misused by anyone.
Illustrative Observations from the Court
The Court in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal said, "The law is well settled that the process of courts should not be allowed to be misused or abused for wreaking vengeance on innocent persons."
In Girish Ramchandra Deshpande, the Supreme Court warned against using criminal law as a tool for blackmail or harassment.
In D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1997 SC 610, the Court laid down safeguards against illegal detention and custodial violence to prevent abuse of power.
How Courts Maintain Vigilance
Preliminary Scrutiny of Complaints: Courts ensure complaints/FIRs are scrutinized to filter out those that lack sufficient grounds.
Quashing of FIRs and Proceedings: Courts exercise their power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to quash cases that are malicious or baseless.
Monitoring Investigations: Courts direct police to conduct fair and objective investigations.
Ensuring Due Process: Upholding principles like presumption of innocence, fair trial, and protection against arbitrary arrest.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court of India has been proactive in recognizing the misuse of criminal justice machinery and has developed robust jurisprudence to counteract it. By laying down clear guidelines, empowering courts to intervene early, and emphasizing judicial vigilance, the Court ensures that the criminal justice system serves its intended purpose—delivering justice fairly and efficiently—while protecting individuals from wrongful harassment.
RELATED Blog
0 comments