Rape Provisions – Changes From Ipc
Rape Provisions: Changes from IPC to Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023
Background:
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 is the newly codified criminal law replacing the IPC, incorporating updated definitions and provisions aimed at making the law more victim-centric, gender-sensitive, and clear about various forms of sexual offences.
Key Changes in Rape Provisions Under BNS Compared to IPC
| Aspect | IPC (Section 375 & 376) | BNS (Section numbers may differ but concepts updated) |
|---|---|---|
| Definition of Rape | Penetration of penis into vagina without consent. Limited scope. | Broadened to include penetration of penis into vagina, anus, mouth, or any orifice; includes use of objects and other body parts. |
| Consent | Consent defined but scope narrow; lack of consent inferred from physical resistance. | Consent defined more clearly as free, voluntary, and informed; consent can be withdrawn anytime. |
| Marital Rape | Marital rape generally exempted (except in cases of separation or wife under 15 years). | Marital rape is recognized as an offence regardless of marital status; no blanket exemption. |
| Aggravated Rape | Includes gang rape, rape of minors, and disabled persons with enhanced punishment. | Includes similar categories but also adds offences committed by persons in authority or custodial positions. |
| Punishment | Minimum 7 years imprisonment, extends up to life imprisonment or death in aggravated cases. | Increased minimum punishment; death penalty more clearly prescribed for aggravated rape involving minors. |
| Gender Neutrality | Rape laws are gender-specific (female victims, male perpetrators). | Expanded to cover all genders; any person can be a victim or perpetrator. |
| New Offences | Separate offences for sexual harassment, assault, etc. | Comprehensive list of sexual offences with gradation of severity and clearer definitions. |
Detailed Provisions Under BNS
Section on Rape defines it as any non-consensual penetration involving penis or any object/body part in any orifice.
Consent requires active participation and free will; absence of physical resistance does not imply consent.
Marital rape is criminalized.
Enhanced focus on protection of children and vulnerable persons.
Increased punishment for repeat offenders.
More emphasis on victim rights and rehabilitation.
Important Case Laws on Rape under IPC (Relevant to Understanding the Changes)
1. Tukaram S. Dighole vs. State of Maharashtra (2010) 4 SCC 329
Facts: Conviction in a rape case where the accused challenged the evidence regarding consent.
Held: Supreme Court held that absence of physical resistance is not consent and lack of resistance does not imply consent when the victim is threatened or intimidated.
Significance: Reinforced that consent must be free and voluntary, not implied from silence or absence of struggle.
2. State of Punjab vs. Gurmit Singh (1996) 2 SCC 384 (Nirbhaya Case precedent for other cases)
Facts: Gang rape and murder of a young woman.
Held: The court awarded death penalty under aggravated rape provisions.
Significance: Established the principle of stringent punishment in aggravated cases of rape, influencing new provisions in BNS for severe penalties.
3. Rupan Deol Bajaj vs. KPS Gill (1995) 6 SCC 194
Facts: A case involving sexual harassment by a superior.
Held: The Court recognized sexual harassment as a serious offence under the law and clarified the scope of consent in hierarchical relationships.
Significance: This case is foundational for expanded protections in BNS against abuse of authority in sexual offences.
4. State of Rajasthan vs. Om Prakash (2009) 3 SCC 582
Facts: The accused was acquitted on grounds of delayed reporting and absence of medical evidence.
Held: Supreme Court held that delay in reporting and lack of medical evidence alone cannot discredit a rape victim’s testimony.
Significance: Strengthened victim protection and emphasized corroborative evidence is not necessary if testimony is credible.
5. Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan (1997) 6 SCC 241
Facts: Landmark case related to sexual harassment and protection of women at workplace.
Held: Supreme Court laid down guidelines to prevent sexual harassment, emphasizing the need for consent and dignity.
Significance: Influenced BNS provisions protecting vulnerable women and enforcing strict penalties for harassment.
6. Independent Thought vs. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 800
Facts: Challenged the exception clause in IPC Section 375 regarding marital rape of girls below 18.
Held: Supreme Court held that marriage is no defence for sexual intercourse with a minor below 18 years.
Significance: Encouraged reforms like those in BNS, making marital rape criminal irrespective of age.
7. State of Kerala vs. N.M. Thomas (1976) 3 SCC 101
Facts: Discussed mental trauma and effects of rape beyond physical assault.
Held: Courts must consider psychological trauma and not just physical evidence.
Significance: BNS incorporates this broader understanding of sexual violence impacts.
Summary of Legal Principles from Case Law Influencing BNS
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Consent | Must be free, voluntary, ongoing, and informed; absence of resistance is not consent. |
| Marital Rape | Marriage does not imply consent; sexual assault within marriage is punishable. |
| Victim Credibility | Delay or absence of medical evidence does not automatically discredit victims. |
| Aggravated Rape | Severe punishment for gang rape, custodial rape, or rape of minors. |
| Sexual Harassment | Recognized as a distinct offence; power dynamics affect consent. |
| Mental Trauma | Psychological harm is considered in sentencing and victim protection. |
Conclusion:
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 modernizes rape laws by:
Broadening the definition of rape.
Strengthening the legal definition of consent.
Criminalizing marital rape.
Enhancing protections for vulnerable groups.
Increasing punishment for aggravated offences.
Including provisions based on decades of judicial interpretation under IPC.
RELATED Blog
0 comments