Role Of Finland In The International Criminal Court
1. Overview: Finland and the ICC
Background on the ICC
The International Criminal Court (ICC), established in 2002 by the Rome Statute, prosecutes:
Genocide
Crimes against humanity
War crimes
Crime of aggression (added in 2018)
The ICC complements national jurisdictions (principle of complementarity): it acts when states are unwilling or unable to prosecute.
Finland’s Commitment
Finland signed the Rome Statute on 8 September 2000 and ratified it on 17 June 2001.
As a state party, Finland:
Cooperates with the ICC in arrests, evidence collection, and enforcement of sentences.
Supports ICC’s mandate internationally, including through funding and participation in Assembly of States Parties (ASP).
Implements domestic legislation to enable prosecution of ICC crimes within Finland.
Domestic Legislation
Finland has enacted “Crimes against International Law Act” (2003):
Enables Finnish courts to prosecute genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
Ensures Finland complies with ICC obligations.
Finland’s Role in ICC
Active cooperation in investigations and arrests.
Political and financial support to ICC operations.
Advocacy in international forums for the court’s jurisdiction and strengthening of international criminal law.
Participation in referral of situations to the ICC, either directly or through UN channels.
2. Key ICC Cases Relevant to Finland’s Role
Finland does not typically initiate prosecutions at the ICC but supports investigations and collaborates with the Court. Several ICC cases demonstrate Finland’s involvement either through cooperation, advocacy, or participation in multilateral decisions.
Case 1: The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (DRC, 2006–2012)
Facts:
Lubanga, a Congolese warlord, was accused of enlisting and using child soldiers.
Finland’s Role:
Provided financial support to ICC investigations through voluntary contributions.
Advocated for human rights protections during trial, emphasizing rehabilitation for child soldiers.
Outcome:
First conviction at the ICC in 2012.
Lubanga sentenced to 14 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Finland’s support illustrates its commitment to ICC enforcement, especially in protecting vulnerable populations.
Case 2: The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda (DRC, 2013–2019)
Facts:
Ntaganda, a Congolese militia leader, charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity, including murder, rape, and recruitment of child soldiers.
Finland’s Role:
Finland cooperated in evidence collection and witness protection policies through UN and ICC channels.
Supported international collaboration for safe testimony of victims.
Outcome:
Convicted in 2019; sentenced to 30 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Finland’s advocacy in witness protection highlighted its influence in procedural aspects of ICC trials.
Case 3: The Prosecutor v. Omar al-Bashir (Sudan, 2009–2020)
Facts:
Omar al-Bashir, former President of Sudan, indicted for genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity in Darfur.
Finland’s Role:
As a state party, issued formal statements supporting ICC arrest warrants.
Advocated in the UN Security Council and ASP for enforcement of ICC orders.
Finland reinforced international pressure for states to cooperate despite political complexities.
Outcome:
Al-Bashir remained at large for years, but ICC investigations and international pressure continued.
Significance:
Demonstrates Finland’s diplomatic and political role in promoting ICC jurisdiction and compliance.
Case 4: Situation in Libya (Prosecutor v. Saif al-Islam Gaddafi)
Facts:
ICC investigated crimes against humanity in Libya during 2011 civil war.
Finland’s Role:
Supported ICC investigations via UN frameworks.
Participated in discussions about transfer of suspects and implementation of ICC orders.
Outcome:
Case pending multiple jurisdictional and cooperation challenges.
Significance:
Finland’s role shows its influence in reinforcing ICC’s capacity in complex international crises.
Case 5: Situation in Georgia (2008)
Facts:
Investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Russia–Georgia conflict.
Finland’s Role:
Supported ICC’s preliminary examinations through ASP funding.
Advocated for compliance with ICC mandates and human rights monitoring.
Significance:
Finland contributes not only financially but also politically to ICC’s work in conflict zones.
Case 6: ICC ASP Resolutions – Universal Role
While not a traditional trial, Finland’s active participation in the Assembly of States Parties has shaped ICC policy:
Advocated for enhanced cooperation in arrests and evidence collection.
Supported funding mechanisms and outreach programs for the ICC.
Pushed for strengthened protection of victims and witnesses.
Significance:
Highlights Finland’s role as a normative and supportive actor in strengthening ICC operations globally.
3. Key Legal and Political Contributions of Finland to ICC
| Contribution | Details |
|---|---|
| Ratification and domestic implementation | Rome Statute ratified; Crimes Against International Law Act enables domestic prosecution |
| Financial support | Regular voluntary contributions to ICC trust funds |
| Political advocacy | Promotes ICC cooperation and compliance at UN and ASP forums |
| Cooperation in investigations | Supports evidence collection, witness protection, and transfer of suspects |
| Normative leadership | Advocates victim rights, gender justice, and human rights compliance in ICC procedures |
4. Summary
Finland plays a supportive, cooperative, and advocacy role rather than initiating prosecutions directly.
Its contributions include:
Ratifying Rome Statute and enacting domestic legislation
Financial and logistical support to ICC operations
Active participation in Assembly of States Parties and UN forums
Advocating for human rights, victim protection, and compliance with ICC orders
Key ICC cases where Finland has been relevant include:
Lubanga, Ntaganda, al-Bashir, Gaddafi, Georgia Conflict, and general ASP policy resolutions.
Takeaway: Finland exemplifies a state that strengthens international criminal justice through cooperation, advocacy, and financial support, showing that ICC effectiveness depends on committed state parties.
RELATED Blog
comments