Cloud Storage Records Admissibility
Context
With the increasing reliance on cloud storage for data retention and transmission, courts frequently face questions about the admissibility and authenticity of electronic records stored on the cloud.
Cloud storage records include emails, documents, transaction logs, metadata, chat messages, and other digital evidence stored on remote servers managed by third parties.
Legal Framework
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Sections 65A and 65B)
These sections govern the admissibility of electronic records.
Section 65A allows electronic records to be admitted as evidence.
Section 65B requires a certificate of authenticity from a person responsible for the operation of the device or system that produced the electronic record.
Principles of Authentication & Chain of Custody
The party seeking to admit cloud records must demonstrate that the records are genuine and untampered.
Proper chain of custody must be maintained to avoid tampering allegations.
Third-Party Custodian Issue
Cloud data is often stored by third-party providers.
Courts examine how to treat such data as evidence: Is the provider a custodian, de facto owner, or a mere intermediary?
Key Conditions for Admissibility
Originality and Integrity: The records must be original or properly certified duplicates.
Certificate under Section 65B: Must accompany the record, specifying the device, manner of operation, and integrity.
Authentication: The data must be authenticated by the person controlling or responsible for the cloud account or service.
Relevance: The record must be relevant to the case.
No Tampering or Alteration: Proof that the record has not been altered or manipulated.
Detailed Case Law Analysis
1. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer (2014) 10 SCC 473
Facts:
The case concerned the admissibility of electronic evidence, including emails and digital documents.
Legal Issue:
Whether electronic records can be admitted without compliance with Section 65B.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that electronic records, including those stored on cloud servers, cannot be admitted without a certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act. Merely printing a document from the cloud does not suffice.
Principle:
Strict compliance with Section 65B is mandatory for admissibility of electronic records.
2. Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2018) 2 SCC 801
Facts:
Dispute over a WhatsApp chat message stored on cloud servers was introduced as evidence.
Legal Issue:
Whether WhatsApp messages stored on cloud storage are admissible.
Judgment:
The Court held that if the electronic record is produced along with a valid 65B certificate, such records stored on the cloud are admissible. The certificate must show the system's reliability.
Principle:
Cloud-stored communication like WhatsApp messages can be admitted if accompanied by a proper certificate under Section 65B.
3. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003) 4 SCC 601
Facts:
The issue was regarding the admissibility of digitally recorded evidence.
Legal Issue:
Whether digitally recorded evidence (like medical reports stored electronically) is admissible.
Judgment:
The court held that digital evidence is admissible provided it satisfies the standards of authenticity and reliability and is supported by proper certification.
Principle:
This case laid down guidelines for the authenticity and reliability of electronic records, which extends to cloud storage records.
4. Trimex International FZE Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd. (2010) 4 SCC 603
Facts:
The arbitration tribunal admitted emails stored in servers outside India as evidence.
Legal Issue:
Whether emails stored on servers outside India are admissible in Indian courts.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that location of server does not affect admissibility if the emails satisfy the criteria of authenticity and relevancy, with proper certificates under Section 65B.
Principle:
Cloud records stored internationally can be admissible subject to statutory requirements.
5. K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan AIR 1999 SC 3763
Facts:
The case involved digital records and their status as electronic evidence.
Legal Issue:
Whether digital records can be considered "documents" under the Evidence Act.
Judgment:
The Court held that digital records, including those on cloud, are documents and admissible under the Evidence Act, provided their authenticity and integrity is proven.
Principle:
Recognition of digital records as admissible documentary evidence.
6. Anil Mathur v. Union of India (2020) SCC OnLine Del 12368
Facts:
Emails and documents stored on cloud platforms were challenged in a service dispute case.
Legal Issue:
Whether cloud-based emails can be admitted as evidence without direct physical possession.
Judgment:
Delhi High Court held that cloud-stored data, once authenticated with a Section 65B certificate, is admissible. The court also emphasized the importance of chain of custody.
Principle:
Cloud records are admissible once authenticity and integrity are established.
7. Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2020) 2 SCC 672
Facts:
The court examined the electronic evidence including data from cloud services.
Legal Issue:
Applicability of Section 65B for electronic records.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court reiterated the mandatory nature of compliance with Section 65B and ruled that any electronic record, including cloud data, must be accompanied by a certificate for admissibility.
Principle:
No exception to Section 65B, even for cloud-stored records.
Summary of Principles for Admissibility of Cloud Storage Records
| Condition/Requirement | Explanation | Case Law Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Mandatory Section 65B Certificate | Without certificate, electronic record inadmissible | Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer; Arjun Panditrao Khotkar |
| Authentication and Chain of Custody | Prove integrity and non-tampering of record | Anil Mathur v. Union of India |
| Location of Server | No bar on admissibility if other conditions met | Trimex International FZE Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd. |
| Relevance and Reliability | Must be relevant and system reliable | State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai |
| Recognition as Documentary Evidence | Digital/cloud data qualifies as documents | K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan |
| Cloud Communication (e.g., WhatsApp) | Admissible with Section 65B compliance | Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh |
Conclusion
Cloud storage records are admissible as evidence provided the strict statutory conditions under Sections 65A and 65B of the Indian Evidence Act are fulfilled.
Courts require certificates of authenticity, proof of non-tampering, and proper chain of custody.
The location of cloud servers (inside or outside India) does not impact admissibility.
Emerging technologies like WhatsApp messages and emails stored in the cloud are now routinely admitted subject to these conditions.
RELATED Blog
0 comments