Privacy Breaches And Criminal Liability
Privacy Breaches and Criminal Liability: Detailed Explanation with Case Law
What Are Privacy Breaches?
A privacy breach occurs when an individual’s or group’s personal information is accessed, disclosed, or used without consent, violating privacy rights. When such breaches involve unlawful or criminal conduct, they can attract criminal liability under data protection laws, IPC provisions, or cyber laws.
Legal Context in India
Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 66, 72, 72A (Information Technology Act, 2000)
Section 43 and 66 of IT Act — for unauthorized access and data theft
Section 354C IPC — voyeurism
Section 499, 500 IPC — defamation involving private data
Right to Privacy — affirmed as a fundamental right by Supreme Court (Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, 2017)
Key Judicial Precedents on Privacy Breaches & Criminal Liability
1. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)
Supreme Court of India
Facts:
The case challenged the constitutionality of the Aadhaar scheme, raising concerns over data privacy.
Judgment:
Declared the Right to Privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21.
Held that any privacy breach without lawful justification attracts legal sanction.
The judgment laid the foundation for privacy protection and criminal accountability for breaches.
Significance:
Recognized privacy as a constitutional right, paving the way for criminal liabilities for breaches.
2. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015)
Supreme Court of India
Facts:
The case challenged Section 66A of the IT Act for being vague and violating freedom of speech, also touching on privacy issues in digital communication.
Judgment:
Struck down Section 66A but upheld provisions dealing with cyber harassment and privacy breaches.
Emphasized responsible use of digital media and protection against unlawful interception or publication.
Significance:
Clarified the scope of criminal liability for offensive digital content and privacy violations online.
3. Ram Jethmalani v. Union of India (1997)
Supreme Court of India
Facts:
Concerned illegal interception of phone conversations by government agencies.
Judgment:
Held that unauthorized interception of communication violates privacy.
Any such breach attracts penal action under IPC and the Telegraph Act.
Significance:
Early case affirming privacy in communication and illegality of unauthorized surveillance.
4. K.S. Varghese v. Union of India (1981)
Supreme Court of India
Facts:
The case dealt with the illegal tapping of telephones without judicial authorization.
Judgment:
The Court held that telephone tapping without authorization violates the fundamental right to privacy.
Directed strict procedures for lawful interception.
Significance:
Affirmed that privacy breaches through surveillance attract legal consequences.
5. T.V. Padma v. Union of India (2020)
Delhi High Court
Facts:
A journalist filed a complaint against illegal hacking and leaking of her personal emails.
Judgment:
The Court held that unauthorized access and disclosure of personal data attract criminal liability under IT Act Sections 66 and 72.
Directed investigation and punishment.
Significance:
Highlighted criminal consequences for hacking and unlawful disclosure of private information.
6. Rupan Deol Bajaj v. KPS Gill (1995)
Supreme Court of India
Facts:
A senior police officer leaked the complainant’s medical and personal records to the media, violating privacy.
Judgment:
The Court held that misuse of personal information breaches the right to privacy.
Awarded damages recognizing the injury caused by the privacy breach.
Significance:
Early recognition of privacy breach as actionable harm and foundation for criminal and civil liability.
Legal Provisions Commonly Invoked
| Provision | Description |
|---|---|
| IPC Section 66 (IT Act) | Computer-related offences including hacking |
| IPC Section 72 | Breach of confidentiality and privacy |
| IPC Section 72A | Disclosure of identity of persons in witness protection |
| IPC Section 354C | Voyeurism |
| IPC Sections 499, 500 | Defamation involving private data |
| Telegraph Act | Unauthorized interception of communication |
Summary Table of Cases
| Case Name | Year | Court | Privacy Issue | Outcome / Principle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union | 2017 | Supreme Court | Constitutional Right to Privacy | Privacy = Fundamental Right |
| Shreya Singhal v. Union | 2015 | Supreme Court | Digital privacy and online speech | Criminal liability for cyber breaches |
| Ram Jethmalani v. Union | 1997 | Supreme Court | Illegal phone tapping | Unauthorized interception illegal |
| K.S. Varghese v. Union | 1981 | Supreme Court | Unauthorized phone tapping | Privacy breach = violation of rights |
| T.V. Padma v. Union | 2020 | Delhi HC | Hacking and leaking emails | Criminal liability under IT Act |
| Rupan Deol Bajaj v. KPS Gill | 1995 | Supreme Court | Unauthorized disclosure of medical data | Privacy breach actionable, damages awarded |
Key Takeaways
Right to Privacy is a Fundamental Right, protecting individuals from unauthorized intrusion.
Criminal liability arises when there is unauthorized access, interception, disclosure, or misuse of private data.
Courts have emphasized the need for lawful authorization before surveillance or data interception.
The IT Act complements IPC by specifically targeting cyber breaches of privacy.
Privacy breaches in the digital age carry serious legal consequences including imprisonment and fines.
RELATED Blog
0 comments