Section 40 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, (BSA), 2023
Certainly! Here's a detailed explanation of Section 40 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA 2023):
🧾 Section 40: Facts Bearing Upon Opinions of Experts
Text of Section 40:
"Facts, not otherwise relevant, are relevant if they support or are inconsistent with the opinions of experts, when such opinions are relevant."
🔍 Understanding Section 40
This section pertains to the admissibility of certain facts that, while not directly related to the main issue of a case, can influence the weight or credibility of an expert's opinion. Specifically, it allows for the introduction of facts that either:
Support the expert's opinion, or
Contradict the expert's opinion.
These facts are considered relevant only when the expert's opinion is itself relevant to the case.
⚖️ Why Is This Important?
In legal proceedings, expert opinions can play a pivotal role in interpreting complex matters, such as medical conditions, engineering assessments, or financial analyses. Section 40 ensures that:
Supporting Facts: Facts that bolster an expert's opinion can be presented to strengthen the argument.
Contradictory Facts: Facts that challenge an expert's opinion can be introduced to question its validity.
This provision helps the court assess the credibility and reliability of expert testimony, ensuring that decisions are based on comprehensive and accurate information.
📌 Illustrations
To clarify the application of Section 40, consider the following examples:
Poisoning Case:
Issue: Determining whether a person was poisoned by a specific substance.
Relevant Fact: Observing that other individuals who were poisoned by the same substance exhibited certain symptoms. If experts affirm that these symptoms are characteristic of that poison, such facts are relevant.
Harbour Obstruction Case:
Issue: Investigating whether an obstruction in a harbour was caused by a particular sea-wall.
Relevant Fact: Noting that other harbours, similar in all respects but without such sea-walls, began to experience obstructions around the same time. This fact can be relevant if it challenges the expert's opinion attributing the obstruction solely to the sea-wall.
🧭 Summary
Purpose: Section 40 allows the introduction of facts that influence the weight of expert opinions.
Application: These facts must be relevant to the expert's opinion and can either support or contradict it.
Objective: To aid the court in evaluating the credibility and reliability of expert testimony, ensuring fair and informed judgments.
RELATED Blog
0 comments