Child Soldier Recruitment Prosecutions
1. Definition and Legal Framework
Recruiting or using children under the age of 15 (sometimes extended to 18) in armed forces or groups is prohibited under international law. This crime is addressed in:
International Criminal Court (ICC) Statute, Article 8(2)(e)(vii) – war crime of conscripting or enlisting children under 15 years or using them to participate actively in hostilities.
Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocols
Rome Statute of the ICC
Various domestic laws implementing these international standards.
Elements of the offense:
Recruitment, enlistment, or use of children under 15 (or under 18 in some jurisdictions) in armed conflict
Knowledge that the victim is under the age limit
Use of child soldiers in hostilities (direct or indirect participation)
2. Key Case Law
Case 1: Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (ICC, 2012)
Facts:
Thomas Lubanga, leader of the Union of Congolese Patriots (UPC), was charged with recruiting and enlisting children under 15 and using them to participate in hostilities during the conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Legal Issue:
Whether Lubanga’s actions amounted to war crimes under ICC jurisdiction, specifically child soldier recruitment.
Held:
Lubanga was found guilty — the first conviction by the ICC. The court held that recruiting children under 15, knowing their age, and using them in hostilities is a grave war crime.
Significance:
Set precedent as the first-ever conviction for child soldier recruitment under international law.
Confirmed the strict liability aspect: recruiting children under 15 is illegal regardless of whether they participated actively.
Case 2: Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda (ICC, 2019)
Facts:
Bosco Ntaganda was a leader of the Patriotic Forces for the Liberation of Congo (FPLC) and was charged with multiple war crimes, including conscripting child soldiers.
Legal Issue:
Whether the evidence proved Ntaganda knowingly conscripted children under 15 to fight.
Held:
Ntaganda was convicted of enlisting and conscripting children under 15 years into armed groups and using them in combat.
Significance:
Reinforced ICC's commitment to prosecuting child soldier recruitment.
Detailed examination of command responsibility: leaders can be held liable even if they didn’t recruit personally but had effective control.
Case 3: Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen (ICC, 2021)
Facts:
Dominic Ongwen, a former child soldier himself, became a commander in the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA). He was charged with recruiting child soldiers and other war crimes.
Legal Issue:
Could a former child soldier be held responsible for recruiting children later in his command?
Held:
Ongwen was found guilty of recruiting and using child soldiers, despite his past as a child soldier.
Significance:
Demonstrated that past victim status does not grant immunity.
Highlighted complexities of rehabilitation vs. criminal responsibility.
Case 4: Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo (ICC, 2016)
Facts:
Bemba, commander of the Movement for the Liberation of Congo (MLC), was charged with crimes including using child soldiers.
Legal Issue:
Whether Bemba was criminally responsible for the acts of his troops, including child soldier recruitment, under the doctrine of command responsibility.
Held:
Initially convicted, but later acquitted on appeal because the prosecution failed to prove he knew or should have known about the crimes.
Significance:
Emphasized strict evidentiary standards for command responsibility.
Showed prosecution challenges in proving knowledge and control over child recruitment.
Case 5: The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) – Prosecutor v. Charles Taylor (2012)
Facts:
Charles Taylor, former Liberian president, was charged with aiding and abetting war crimes, including child soldier recruitment by rebel groups in Sierra Leone.
Legal Issue:
Whether Taylor could be held responsible for supporting groups that recruited child soldiers.
Held:
Taylor was convicted of aiding and abetting war crimes, including child soldier recruitment, due to his substantial support and control over the rebels.
Significance:
Extended liability to political leaders and sponsors.
Demonstrated international willingness to prosecute indirect participation in child soldier recruitment.
3. Summary and Key Legal Principles
Age Limit: Recruiting or using children under 15 (sometimes 18) is criminal under international law.
Strict Liability: It is a war crime regardless of consent or coercion.
Command Responsibility: Leaders can be held liable for recruitment by forces under their control.
Victim-Perpetrator Complexity: Even former child soldiers can be prosecuted if they recruit others.
Proof of Knowledge: Prosecutors must prove that the accused knew or should have known about the recruitment.
RELATED Blog
0 comments