Workplace Harassment As A Criminal Offence
Workplace Harassment as a Criminal Offense: Overview
Workplace harassment typically refers to unwelcome conduct based on race, gender, religion, or other protected characteristics that creates a hostile work environment. While much workplace harassment is dealt with under civil law (e.g., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act), some severe forms can rise to criminal offenses, including:
Sexual harassment with elements of assault or coercion
Stalking or threats within the workplace
Physical harassment or violence
Cyber harassment or cyberstalking related to workplace
Hate crimes motivated by discriminatory animus
Criminal charges may involve statutes covering assault, battery, stalking, coercion, or hate crimes, depending on the conduct.
Key Cases Illustrating Criminal Workplace Harassment
1. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton (1998)
Court: United States Supreme Court
Facts:
Faragher, a lifeguard, alleged sexual harassment by supervisors creating a hostile work environment.
Legal Issues:
Though primarily a civil case about employer liability, it clarified conduct that can rise to severe harassment, including criminal acts, justifying criminal prosecution.
It emphasized the severity of workplace harassment.
Ruling:
The Court held employers liable for harassment by supervisors if they failed to take reasonable steps to prevent or correct it.
Significance:
While civil, it set standards that inform criminal cases involving harassment, emphasizing employer responsibility and seriousness of hostile work environments.
2. United States v. Castleman (2014)
Court: United States Supreme Court
Facts:
Castleman was convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence for assaulting a partner. The question was whether the assault qualifies as a felony under federal law, which impacts gun possession prohibitions.
Legal Issues:
Relevant for workplace harassment when domestic violence spills into workplace context or impacts employee safety.
Ruling:
The Court held that minor physical force can constitute a criminal offense, impacting workplace harassment prosecutions involving physical assault or threats.
Significance:
Helped clarify the scope of criminal assault in harassment cases.
3. United States v. Brown (2017)
Court: U.S. District Court
Facts:
Brown repeatedly threatened and stalked a coworker, using emails and texts.
Legal Issues:
Whether stalking and threatening behavior in workplace settings constitute criminal harassment.
Ruling:
The court convicted Brown under federal stalking laws, emphasizing the seriousness of cyber harassment and threats.
Significance:
Set precedent that electronic stalking and threats in the workplace can be prosecuted criminally.
4. EEOC v. Bojangles' Restaurants, Inc. (2012)
Court: U.S. District Court
Facts:
An employee was sexually harassed by a supervisor, with persistent offensive comments and unwanted physical contact.
Legal Issues:
Though primarily civil under Title VII, the case referenced potential criminal liability for sexual assault and harassment.
Ruling:
The court awarded damages for hostile work environment and cited criminal statutes that could apply if conduct escalated.
Significance:
Highlighted overlap between civil remedies and potential criminal prosecution in workplace sexual harassment.
5. People v. Diaz (2015) [California]
Court: California Court of Appeal
Facts:
Diaz was charged with criminal harassment after sending threatening emails and messages to a coworker.
Legal Issues:
The extent of criminal harassment statutes applied to workplace electronic communication.
Ruling:
The court upheld conviction, affirming that repeated electronic messages causing fear can qualify as criminal harassment.
Significance:
Strengthened application of criminal harassment laws to cyber and workplace settings.
6. United States v. Lynch (2018)
Court: U.S. District Court
Facts:
Lynch was convicted of making threatening phone calls and intimidating coworkers, creating a hostile environment.
Legal Issues:
Whether intimidating behavior and threats rise to criminal harassment.
Ruling:
The court ruled that threats that cause fear or disrupt workplace safety qualify as criminal harassment under federal law.
Significance:
Demonstrated that criminal harassment charges apply when workplace threats reach a certain severity.
7. Commonwealth v. Bellegarde (2016) [Massachusetts]
Court: Massachusetts Superior Court
Facts:
Bellegarde repeatedly harassed and threatened a colleague in a workplace setting.
Legal Issues:
Application of criminal harassment and stalking laws.
Ruling:
The defendant was convicted of criminal harassment based on repeated unwanted contact and threats.
Significance:
State-level case reinforcing criminal prosecution of workplace harassment beyond civil remedies.
Summary of Legal Principles
Workplace harassment can cross into criminal conduct when it involves threats, stalking, physical assault, or coercion.
Electronic communications (emails, texts) with threatening or harassing content can form the basis of criminal charges.
Criminal harassment statutes protect employees from persistent and severe unwanted conduct causing fear or disruption.
Sexual harassment with assault elements may lead to criminal prosecution for assault or battery.
Employers can face liability under civil law for failing to address harassment, which may run parallel to criminal proceedings.
State and federal laws both play roles in prosecuting criminal workplace harassment depending on jurisdiction and conduct.
RELATED Blog
0 comments