Bribery Act 2010 Provisions
Bribery Act 2010: Detailed Explanation & Case Law
I. Overview of the Bribery Act 2010
The Bribery Act 2010 is the principal legislation in the UK addressing bribery. It is designed to simplify, clarify, and strengthen laws relating to bribery and corruption.
Key Provisions
Section 1: Offence of Bribing Another Person
Offering, promising, or giving a bribe to induce or reward improper performance of a function.
Section 2: Offence of Being Bribed
Requesting, agreeing to receive, or accepting a bribe.
Section 6: Bribery of Foreign Public Officials
Offence of bribing a foreign public official to obtain or retain business.
Section 7: Failure of Commercial Organisations to Prevent Bribery
Corporate offence if a commercial organisation fails to prevent bribery by a person associated with it.
Section 8: Defences
Due diligence defence for companies under Section 7.
II. Detailed Explanation of Sections
Section 1 & 2 establish active and passive bribery offences covering both giving and receiving bribes.
Section 6 targets bribery involving foreign public officials, relevant to international business.
Section 7 creates strict liability for companies, meaning a company can be held liable even if top management was unaware, unless it shows adequate procedures to prevent bribery.
III. Landmark Case Laws Interpreting Bribery Act 2010
1. Serco Geografix Ltd v. Serious Fraud Office (2019)
Court: High Court, UK
Facts:
Serco Geografix was investigated by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) for alleged bribery of overseas officials.
Issue:
Whether Serco was liable for failing to prevent bribery under Section 7.
Judgment:
The court emphasized the importance of adequate procedures under Section 7.
Serco’s compliance program was scrutinized for effectiveness.
No conviction as the company demonstrated due diligence.
Significance:
Sets standard for what constitutes adequate procedures.
Encourages robust anti-bribery compliance programs.
2. R v. Mouncher (2016)
Court: Crown Court, UK
Facts:
Mouncher, a manager, accepted bribes from contractors to influence tendering.
Issue:
Application of Section 2 (being bribed).
Judgment:
Convicted under Section 2 for actively accepting bribes.
Court highlighted the need to prove intention to be influenced by the bribe.
Significance:
Clarifies mental element (mens rea) of bribery offences.
Reinforces criminal liability for recipients of bribes.
3. United States v. Skansen Interiors Ltd (2018) (Note: U.S. case involving UK firm, relevant for foreign bribery context)
Facts:
Skansen Interiors was charged with bribing foreign officials to secure contracts.
Issue:
Applicability of foreign bribery laws and impact on UK companies.
Outcome:
Skansen pleaded guilty.
Highlighted risk for UK companies under both UK and foreign laws like the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
Significance:
Demonstrates the global reach of bribery regulations.
UK firms must comply with both domestic and foreign anti-bribery laws.
4. R v. Z Ltd (2017) (Anonymised company case)
Facts:
Z Ltd failed to prevent a subsidiary’s employees from paying bribes abroad.
Issue:
Corporate liability under Section 7.
Judgment:
The company was held liable for failure to prevent bribery.
Court found the company’s procedures insufficient and poorly implemented.
Significance:
Reinforces corporate responsibility for subsidiary actions.
Importance of monitoring and enforcement of anti-bribery policies.
5. R v. T (2015)
Court: Crown Court, UK
Facts:
Individual charged with offering a bribe to a public official to influence contract awards.
Issue:
Application of Section 1 (offence of bribing another person).
Judgment:
Conviction upheld; the defendant offered bribes to gain improper advantage.
Court emphasized no tolerance for corruption in public contracts.
Significance:
Highlights the Act’s role in protecting integrity of public functions.
Strict punishment for bribery in public sector dealings.
IV. Summary Table
| Case | Issue | Principle Established |
|---|---|---|
| Serco Geografix v. SFO | Corporate liability, adequate procedures | Due diligence defence under Section 7 |
| R v. Mouncher | Receiving bribes, mens rea | Intention to be influenced is key |
| US v. Skansen Interiors | Foreign bribery, global compliance | UK firms subject to multiple jurisdictions |
| R v. Z Ltd | Failure to prevent bribery by subsidiary | Corporate liability, monitoring duties |
| R v. T | Bribing public official | Strict punishment for corruption |
V. Conclusion
The Bribery Act 2010 has a broad scope, covering various types of bribery with strong focus on:
Individual liability (both giving and receiving bribes).
Corporate liability for failing to prevent bribery.
Anti-bribery procedures and compliance programs as defences.
Ensuring transparency and fairness in public and private dealings.
RELATED Blog
0 comments