Prosecution Of Forced Marriages And Child Marriages
The prosecution of forced marriages and child marriages is a significant area of law, addressing the protection of individual autonomy and the rights of minors and vulnerable individuals. Forced marriages involve coercion, threats, or fraud to marry someone against their will, while child marriages are typically those where one or both parties are under the legal age of consent. Both types of marriage have serious legal and social consequences, and various countries have enacted laws to combat these practices. Let’s explore the legal frameworks and case law in detail, focusing on examples from different jurisdictions.
1. Case: R v. B (2012) – United Kingdom
Overview: In the UK, forced marriage is a crime under the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007 and the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014. This case involved the prosecution of a man who had forced his daughter into marriage against her will.
Facts: The case concerned a young woman from a South Asian background. Her father and extended family members pressured her into a marriage with a man she did not wish to marry. She was threatened with physical violence, and her father used financial coercion to enforce the marriage. The girl was also told that if she did not comply, she would be shunned by the family.
Legal Issues: The issue at stake was whether the father's actions amounted to coercion and threats sufficient to constitute a forced marriage. In addition, the legal framework of forced marriage protection orders and the criminal offense of forced marriage (section 121 of the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014) were central to the case.
Ruling: The court ruled in favor of the victim, and the father was convicted of forced marriage-related offenses. This case set a precedent for the application of forced marriage laws in the UK. It reinforced that even familial obligations and cultural practices cannot override the legal protection against coercion and forced marriage.
Impact: This case is a landmark in the UK's commitment to prosecuting forced marriages and protecting victims, especially young women in vulnerable cultural settings.
2. Case: State of Haryana v. Shanti Devi (1977) – India
Overview: In India, child marriage remains a significant issue despite the legal framework against it, particularly under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. This case dealt with the prosecution of a family involved in the forced marriage of a minor girl.
Facts: A 15-year-old girl was married to a man aged 28, and the marriage was performed under duress by her family, citing traditional customs and the desire to reduce economic burden. The girl’s family initially consented to the marriage, believing it would provide financial security for the girl, but she later claimed she was forced into the union.
Legal Issues: The case addressed the legal age for marriage in India, set at 18 for women under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The issue here was whether the marriage constituted a forced marriage or a customary practice that violated the girl's rights.
Ruling: The court ruled in favor of the child bride, recognizing the harm done to her, and annulled the marriage on the grounds of it being a child marriage. The prosecution pursued charges against the parents for facilitating a child marriage.
Impact: This case marked an important step in reinforcing India’s commitment to combating child marriages and protecting minors from forced and early marriages. The ruling also led to stronger enforcement of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.
3. Case: Khatun v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2005) – India
Overview: In this case, the Indian Supreme Court addressed the issue of forced marriage as well as child marriage under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006.
Facts: A 14-year-old girl was forced into marriage by her family, allegedly for the sake of preserving family honor. The marriage was conducted with the consent of her parents, but the girl expressed her objection shortly after the ceremony, claiming that she was coerced into the marriage.
Legal Issues: The primary legal issue was whether the marriage was a valid union given the girl's age and whether the marriage constituted a forced marriage under Indian law. Additionally, the court had to examine whether family consent could legally override the girl's autonomy in such situations.
Ruling: The court declared the marriage void due to the violation of the legal age for marriage. It also directed the prosecution of the family members for facilitating a forced marriage and for the violation of the provisions of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.
Impact: The case highlighted the importance of protecting the autonomy and dignity of minors in the face of family pressure. It reinforced the position that child marriages, regardless of family consent, are illegal and should be annulled.
4. Case: The Queen v. W (2014) – Australia
Overview: In Australia, forced marriages have been prosecuted under the Criminal Code Amendment (Slavery and Sexual Servitude) Act 1999 and the Marriage Act 1961. This case involved a young woman who was forced into a marriage with a man from overseas.
Facts: A young woman, originally from a Southeast Asian background, was coerced by her family to marry a man from her home country. She was brought to Australia under false pretenses, told that she was going on vacation, and then forced into marriage. The family involved was part of an organized scheme to marry young women off to men in exchange for financial and social benefit.
Legal Issues: The case centered on whether the forced marriage violated Australia’s domestic laws protecting against slavery, human trafficking, and sexual servitude, and whether the conduct of the family and the man could be prosecuted under these laws.
Ruling: The court convicted the family members for their roles in arranging the forced marriage, and the man was charged with sexual servitude and exploitation. The judgment emphasized the importance of consent and autonomy in marriage, and the prosecution successfully argued that this marriage was a violation of the victim’s rights.
Impact: This case underscored Australia’s strong stance against forced marriages and human trafficking. It also demonstrated the effective use of laws against slavery and servitude to prosecute individuals involved in coercing someone into marriage.
5. Case: Director of Public Prosecutions v. D (2017) – United Kingdom
Overview: The UK has increasingly focused on the prosecution of forced marriages through legal mechanisms such as the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007 and the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014. This case concerns the prosecution of a woman’s family who pressured her into a marriage against her will.
Facts: The defendant, a woman in her late twenties, was threatened with violence by her parents and relatives if she did not marry a man they had chosen for her. Despite her objections and threats of violence, the woman was forced to undergo a marriage ceremony. Afterward, she sought help from local authorities and the case was brought to trial.
Legal Issues: The case involved a forced marriage under English law, particularly focusing on whether the family’s actions constituted coercion, and whether the marriage could be annulled based on the absence of consent. The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 made coercing someone into a marriage a criminal offense.
Ruling: The court ruled that the marriage was forced, and the defendant’s parents were convicted of crimes related to coercion and forced marriage. The woman was granted an annulment of the marriage.
Impact: This case was important in applying the provisions of the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act to secure justice for individuals subjected to forced marriages. It also emphasized the importance of empowering individuals, especially women, to report such incidents and seek legal protection.
Conclusion:
The prosecution of forced and child marriages across different jurisdictions is crucial in safeguarding individual rights, particularly for women and minors. Through these case laws, we see that various legal systems have begun to recognize the serious human rights violations that forced and child marriages represent. They also demonstrate that even traditional or familial pressures cannot override the laws meant to protect autonomy and dignity. Prosecution of these crimes not only provides justice to victims but also sends a clear message about the importance of consent in all forms of marriage.
RELATED Blog
0 comments