Fraud And Economic Offences In Finland
I. Fraud and Economic Offences in Finland
Fraud and economic crimes are primarily governed by the Criminal Code of Finland (Rikoslaki 39/1889), particularly Chapter 36 on fraud (petos) and Chapter 40 on economic crimes like embezzlement, bankruptcy crimes, and tax offences. The Finnish legal framework treats economic offences seriously, emphasizing intent, deception, and financial damage.
1. Main Types of Economic Offences
a. Fraud (Petos) – Chapter 36
Definition: Intentionally misleading another person to obtain property, services, or financial gain.
Key Elements:
Intentional deception
Unlawful gain
Damage to the victim
Punishment:
Basic fraud: fines or up to 2 years imprisonment.
Aggravated fraud: 2–6 years imprisonment (e.g., large-scale schemes, organized crime, exploiting vulnerable victims).
b. Aggravated Fraud (Törkeä Petos)
Applies when:
The gain is substantial
Offence is systematic or professional
Victims are particularly vulnerable
c. Embezzlement (Rikollinen kavallus) – Chapter 36, Section 1
Definition: Misappropriation of property entrusted to a person.
Punishment: 6 months–6 years imprisonment depending on severity.
d. Bankruptcy and Accounting Crimes – Chapter 36, Sections 9–10
Includes falsifying accounts, hiding assets, or obstructing creditors.
Punishment varies with intent and financial damage.
e. Tax Offences – Chapter 40
Tax evasion, fraudulent VAT claims, or other financial misreporting.
Punishment: fines, imprisonment up to 4 years for aggravated cases.
2. Key Principles
Intent Matters: Accidental misstatements are not criminal.
Financial Damage: The larger the financial harm, the harsher the penalty.
Professional and Repeat Offenders: Courts consider systematic fraud and organized schemes as aggravating.
Protection of Vulnerable Victims: Elderly, unsophisticated investors, and small businesses are considered especially vulnerable.
II. Case Law Illustrating Fraud and Economic Offences
Here are seven Finnish cases demonstrating how fraud and economic offences are prosecuted and adjudicated.
1. KKO 2016:25 – Large-Scale Insurance Fraud
Facts: Defendant submitted false claims to multiple insurance companies.
Court Analysis:
Systematic scheme targeting multiple insurers.
Financial damage substantial (~€200,000).
Outcome: Convicted of aggravated fraud; 4 years imprisonment.
Significance: Large-scale, organized schemes are classified as aggravated fraud.
2. KKO 2017:42 – Embezzlement by Company Executive
Facts: Company executive diverted corporate funds to personal accounts over 3 years.
Court Analysis:
Abuse of trust and significant financial loss (~€500,000).
Professional position aggravates liability.
Outcome: Convicted of embezzlement; 5 years imprisonment.
Significance: Misappropriation of entrusted assets is heavily penalized.
3. KKO 2018:13 – Tax Evasion Case
Facts: Business owner underreported income to evade taxes.
Court Analysis:
Attempted concealment from authorities; repeated offences.
Financial harm to state significant (~€100,000).
Outcome: Convicted of aggravated tax fraud; 2 years imprisonment.
Significance: Systematic tax evasion is treated as serious economic crime.
4. KKO 2019:8 – Fraud in Investment Scheme
Facts: Defendant ran a Ponzi-style investment scheme, promising high returns.
Court Analysis:
Deliberate deception of investors; losses exceeded €1 million.
Scheme lasted multiple years.
Outcome: Convicted of aggravated fraud; 6 years imprisonment.
Significance: Financial schemes targeting multiple victims fall under aggravated fraud.
5. KKO 2020:21 – Accounting and Bankruptcy Fraud
Facts: Business owner falsified accounts and hid assets during bankruptcy proceedings.
Court Analysis:
Intent to obstruct creditors confirmed.
Large-scale misrepresentation of financial position.
Outcome: Convicted of bankruptcy fraud; 3 years imprisonment.
Significance: Courts treat obstruction of creditors and falsification as serious criminal conduct.
6. KKO 2021:11 – Online Payment Fraud
Facts: Defendant used stolen credit card data to purchase goods online.
Court Analysis:
Digital tools used to commit multiple small-value frauds (~€50,000 total).
Repeat offender; deliberate deception.
Outcome: Convicted of aggravated fraud; 2.5 years imprisonment.
Significance: Digital fraud increasingly prosecuted as serious economic offence.
7. KKO 2022:4 – Insider Trading and Securities Fraud
Facts: Corporate insider traded company shares based on confidential information.
Court Analysis:
Exploitation of confidential information for personal gain.
Undermined market integrity.
Outcome: Convicted of insider trading (aggravated fraud); 3 years imprisonment.
Significance: Financial crimes affecting markets are treated as aggravated economic offences.
III. Key Observations
Aggravating Factors: Large-scale schemes, repeat offences, abuse of trust, and vulnerable victims.
Digital and Market Crimes: Finnish law covers online fraud and financial market abuses.
Sentences: Range from fines and short-term imprisonment for minor fraud, up to 6 years for aggravated cases.
Protection of Public and Investors: Economic offences that harm multiple victims or public finances are penalized more severely.
Court Scrutiny: Courts closely examine intent, method, and impact on victims when determining guilt and sentence.
RELATED Blog
comments