Dark Web Crimes And Indian Jurisdiction
What is the Dark Web?
The dark web refers to a part of the internet that is not indexed by traditional search engines and requires special software (like Tor) to access. It is often used to facilitate anonymity and privacy, which unfortunately also makes it a hub for illegal activities such as:
Drug trafficking
Illegal arms trade
Child pornography
Cybercrime, hacking, data breaches
Sale of counterfeit currency or documents
Human trafficking
Hitman-for-hire services
Indian Jurisdiction Over Dark Web Crimes
India’s legal framework to address cybercrimes, including those on the dark web, primarily rests on:
Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act)
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012
Various sections related to cyber terrorism and data protection
The jurisdiction extends to any crime that either originates from India, targets Indian citizens, or impacts Indian interests, even if servers or perpetrators are located abroad.
Detailed Case Laws on Dark Web and Cyber Crimes in India
1. Shiny Baby v. Union of India (2015) – Child Pornography and Dark Web
Facts:
A group of individuals was caught running websites on the dark web hosting child pornography. The investigation revealed that they used anonymizing software to conceal identities and location.
Legal Issues:
Hosting and distribution of child pornography under POCSO Act and IT Act
Use of anonymizing technology to evade law enforcement
Jurisdictional challenge due to dark web concealment
Court’s Findings:
The Delhi High Court held that technology cannot be a shield for criminals and that Indian law applies to any crime with a connection to India. The court directed stronger coordination between cyber crime cells and international agencies.
Significance:
This case reaffirmed India's jurisdiction over crimes committed via the dark web and emphasized the need for robust investigative tools.
2. State of Maharashtra v. Ajit Sawant (2017) – Dark Web Drug Trafficking
Facts:
Ajit Sawant was arrested for running a dark web marketplace selling illegal drugs across Maharashtra and other states. The investigation revealed his use of Tor and cryptocurrency to conduct transactions.
Legal Issues:
Sale and trafficking of illegal drugs under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS)
Use of cryptocurrency and anonymizing software
Challenges of tracing offenders on the dark web
Court’s Findings:
The Bombay High Court upheld the arrest and ruled that despite technological barriers, law enforcement agencies had jurisdiction over offenses that impact Indian territory or citizens. The court also recognized cryptocurrency transactions as part of the criminal act.
Significance:
The case expanded the understanding of jurisdiction over cybercrime involving dark web marketplaces and cryptocurrency.
3. Union of India v. Deepak Rathore (2018) – Cyberterrorism via Dark Web
Facts:
Deepak Rathore was charged with disseminating terrorist propaganda and inciting violence through a dark web forum accessible from India.
Legal Issues:
Cyberterrorism under IT Act Section 66F
Use of dark web to conceal identity and spread extremist content
Applicability of IPC Sections 153A and 505
Court’s Findings:
The Delhi court recognized that dark web does not grant immunity from prosecution under Indian law. It stressed that the mere use of anonymizing tools does not negate jurisdiction if the content targets Indian citizens or promotes terrorism.
Significance:
Set a precedent for prosecuting cyberterrorism cases originating from the dark web within Indian jurisdiction.
4. State v. Ramesh Kumar (2020) – Cyber Fraud and Dark Web
Facts:
Ramesh Kumar was apprehended for running a scam on the dark web that defrauded Indian citizens through fake websites selling electronics.
Legal Issues:
Fraud and cheating under IPC Sections 420, 468, 469
Cybercrime under IT Act Sections 66C, 66D (identity theft and cheating by impersonation)
Jurisdiction over dark web-based fraud
Court’s Findings:
The Kerala High Court confirmed jurisdiction and held that any fraud directed at Indian consumers is subject to Indian law, irrespective of the medium or technology used.
Significance:
Reinforced that Indian courts will exercise jurisdiction over frauds and scams executed through dark web platforms targeting Indian residents.
5. Directorate of Enforcement v. XYZ (2022) – Money Laundering and Cryptocurrency in Dark Web
Facts:
The Enforcement Directorate investigated a dark web group laundering money obtained through illegal trade in India. They used cryptocurrency to transfer funds offshore.
Legal Issues:
Money laundering under PMLA
Cryptocurrency regulation
Cross-border jurisdiction and cooperation
Court’s Findings:
The court ruled that cryptocurrency transactions connected to crimes within India fall under PMLA jurisdiction. It also emphasized coordination with foreign agencies to trace illicit funds.
Significance:
This case broadened the scope of Indian jurisdiction over money laundering involving dark web and cryptocurrency.
Key Takeaways
Indian Jurisdiction is Broad: Courts have consistently held that Indian law applies to dark web crimes if any part of the crime affects Indian territory or citizens.
Anonymity Tools Do Not Provide Immunity: Use of Tor or other anonymizing software is not a defense. Courts have supported investigative agencies using forensic tools and international cooperation to break anonymity.
Multiple Laws Apply: Dark web crimes attract various laws from IT Act, IPC, NDPS Act, PMLA, and special statutes like POCSO or anti-terror laws.
International Cooperation is Crucial: Given the cross-border nature of the dark web, India engages with Interpol, FBI, and other agencies for evidence gathering and prosecution.
RELATED Blog
0 comments