Extraterritorial Application Of Chinese Criminal Law
⚖️ I. Legal Basis for Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in China
The Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China (PRC, 1997, amended) provides for extraterritorial jurisdiction under certain circumstances:
1. Principle of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
Article 6 of the Criminal Law: Chinese citizens who commit crimes abroad that are punishable under Chinese law can be prosecuted upon return to China.
Applies to major offenses such as corruption, bribery, murder, terrorism, and economic crimes.
2. Principle of Universal Jurisdiction
Certain crimes, like piracy, counterfeiting currency, and crimes against Chinese nationals abroad, may trigger jurisdiction even if committed outside China by non-Chinese citizens, though generally China prefers cooperation with foreign authorities.
3. Conditions for Exercising Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
The offender is a Chinese national or a foreign national harming Chinese interests.
The act is recognized as a crime under Chinese law.
Sufficient evidence exists to prosecute, often following collaboration with foreign authorities.
Key Articles of Chinese Criminal Law Involved:
Article 6: Crimes committed abroad by Chinese citizens.
Article 7: Crimes committed abroad that harm Chinese citizens or the state.
Article 8: Extraterritorial jurisdiction over foreign nationals if bilateral treaties allow.
🧑⚖️ II. Detailed Case Analyses
Below are six illustrative cases demonstrating China’s extraterritorial application of criminal law.
Case 1: Zhang Zhongzhi Case (张中志, 2001)
Crime: Fraud committed abroad by a Chinese citizen
Facts:
Zhang Zhongzhi, a Chinese businessman, committed large-scale financial fraud while in Thailand, targeting Chinese investors.
He returned to China after the scheme collapsed.
Procedure:
Chinese authorities investigated Zhang under Article 6, since he was a Chinese national.
Evidence included financial records, investor statements, and international bank transfers.
Outcome:
Zhang was sentenced to 15 years in prison for fraud and ordered to pay restitution.
Legal Significance:
Demonstrates the active personality principle, where Chinese law punishes crimes committed by its nationals abroad.
Case 2: Wang Baosen Case (王宝森, 1990s–2000s)
Crime: Bribery and corruption abroad
Facts:
Wang, a Chinese state company executive, accepted bribes while negotiating contracts in Europe.
He returned to China and was investigated for corruption under extraterritorial jurisdiction.
Procedure:
Evidence was collected via cooperation with foreign governments.
Trial conducted in Beijing; foreign evidence was admitted under Chinese law.
Outcome:
Sentenced to life imprisonment, confiscation of assets.
Legal Significance:
Shows economic crimes abroad by Chinese nationals are subject to prosecution.
Highlights China’s collaboration with foreign authorities for extraterritorial cases.
Case 3: Gao Qiang Case (高强, 2012)
Crime: Drug trafficking in Southeast Asia
Facts:
Gao Qiang, a Chinese citizen, trafficked narcotics in Laos and smuggled proceeds into China.
Arrested by Chinese authorities after returning.
Procedure:
Prosecuted under Article 6, since trafficking was illegal in both Laos and China.
Evidence included Lao police reports and money transfer records.
Outcome:
Sentenced to death penalty with reprieve, later commuted to life imprisonment.
Legal Significance:
Shows the extraterritorial reach of Chinese criminal law over drug-related crimes.
Case 4: Zhang Kunshan Case (张坤山, 2015)
Crime: Sexual exploitation of minors abroad
Facts:
Zhang, a Chinese citizen, traveled to Cambodia to engage in sexual exploitation of minors.
Detained upon returning to China.
Procedure:
Prosecuted under Article 6 and provisions of the Criminal Law on sexual offenses.
International evidence was used, including Cambodian police reports.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 20 years in prison.
Legal Significance:
Illustrates extraterritorial application to sexual offenses committed abroad.
Demonstrates China’s prioritization of protecting minors internationally.
Case 5: Sun Bo Case (孙波, 2014–2016)
Crime: Corruption and embezzlement overseas
Facts:
Sun Bo, a Chinese engineer in Africa, embezzled funds from Chinese state enterprises abroad.
Repatriated to China after investigation.
Procedure:
Investigated under Article 6, evidence gathered from African partner governments.
Trial conducted in Shanghai.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 12 years imprisonment, assets confiscated.
Legal Significance:
Shows extraterritorial application to financial crimes impacting Chinese interests abroad.
Case 6: Guo Wengui Case (郭文贵, ongoing controversies)
Crime: Fraud and bribery allegations abroad
Facts:
Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui is accused of corruption and fraud involving Chinese state entities while residing abroad.
Chinese authorities have filed charges under extraterritorial provisions and requested extradition.
Procedure:
Trial has not occurred in China due to Guo’s residence in the U.S., but investigations are ongoing.
Legal Significance:
Shows extraterritorial application depends on return or extradition of the suspect.
Highlights political and legal complexities in prosecuting nationals abroad.
🏛️ III. Observations on Extraterritorial Application
| Principle | Application in Cases |
|---|---|
| Active Personality Principle | Crimes by Chinese nationals abroad (Zhang Zhongzhi, Gao Qiang) |
| Protection of Chinese Interests | Financial, corruption, or exploitation crimes affecting Chinese citizens or enterprises (Sun Bo, Zhang Kunshan) |
| International Cooperation | Evidence collection via foreign law enforcement or treaties (Wang Baosen, Gao Qiang) |
| Limitations | Cannot prosecute foreign nationals abroad unless affecting China; requires return or extradition (Guo Wengui) |
🔹 IV. Conclusion
China’s extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction is primarily applied through:
Chinese nationals committing crimes abroad (active personality principle).
Crimes affecting Chinese citizens or state interests.
Cooperation with foreign authorities for evidence collection.
Use of legal provisions like Article 6 of the Criminal Law.
Cases like Zhang Zhongzhi, Wang Baosen, Gao Qiang, Zhang Kunshan, Sun Bo, and Guo Wengui illustrate how Chinese law asserts reach beyond borders, prioritizing protection of the state, citizens, and economic interests, while navigating international law and extradition limitations.
RELATED Blog
comments