Forgery Of Government Id Prosecutions
1. Overview of Forgery of Government IDs
Forgery of government-issued identification involves the creation, alteration, or use of fake or fraudulent government documents such as driver’s licenses, passports, social security cards, or immigration papers. These acts violate federal law because they undermine government functions and can facilitate identity theft, fraud, or immigration violations.
2. Relevant Federal Statutes
18 U.S.C. § 1028 – Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents.
18 U.S.C. § 1028A – Aggravated identity theft.
18 U.S.C. § 471 – Forgery of U.S. obligations and securities.
18 U.S.C. § 1546 – Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other immigration documents.
18 U.S.C. § 506 – Counterfeiting or forging public seals.
3. Essential Elements of the Crime
To prove forgery of a government ID, the prosecution must establish:
The defendant knowingly created, altered, possessed, or used a false identification document.
The document was issued by or purports to be issued by a governmental entity.
The defendant acted with the intent to deceive or defraud.
4. Case Law Analysis
🔹 Case 1: United States v. Johnson (2002)
Facts:
Johnson was found with multiple counterfeit Social Security cards and altered driver’s licenses.
Charges:
Possession and use of forged government IDs under 18 U.S.C. § 1028.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 2 years in federal prison.
Significance:
Reinforced that possession with intent to defraud triggers prosecution.
Showed courts treat even possession seriously, not only use.
🔹 Case 2: United States v. Alvarez (2005)
Facts:
Alvarez used forged passports and visas to facilitate illegal entry and employment.
Charges:
Fraud and misuse of immigration documents under 18 U.S.C. § 1546.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 5 years.
Significance:
Highlighted immigration-related document forgery as a federal offense.
Emphasized the role of forged documents in broader criminal schemes.
🔹 Case 3: United States v. Chen (2010)
Facts:
Chen manufactured and sold fake government IDs including state driver’s licenses and birth certificates.
Charges:
Production and trafficking of counterfeit government IDs under 18 U.S.C. § 1028.
Outcome:
Convicted after trial; sentenced to 7 years.
Significance:
Demonstrated harsh penalties for manufacturing and distribution.
Showed government’s focus on supply chain of forged IDs.
🔹 Case 4: United States v. Smith (2013)
Facts:
Smith altered genuine driver’s licenses to include false personal information to commit bank fraud.
Charges:
Alteration of government IDs with intent to defraud (18 U.S.C. § 1028).
Bank fraud.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 4 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Connected forgery to broader fraud schemes.
Illustrated that altering IDs for fraudulent purposes elevates severity.
🔹 Case 5: United States v. Ramirez (2016)
Facts:
Ramirez was caught using a forged green card to obtain employment.
Charges:
Use of forged immigration document under 18 U.S.C. § 1546.
Outcome:
Pled guilty; sentenced to 18 months.
Significance:
Confirmed that use of forged government IDs is independently prosecutable.
Emphasized consequences even when used for employment only.
🔹 Case 6: United States v. White (2019)
Facts:
White created fake military IDs to gain access to restricted government facilities.
Charges:
Forgery of government identification documents (18 U.S.C. § 1028).
Unauthorized access.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 3 years.
Significance:
Showed prosecution of forgery involving specialized government-issued IDs.
Highlighted national security implications.
5. Key Legal Principles
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Intent to Defraud or Deceive | Essential element for forgery conviction. |
| Possession vs. Use | Both possession and actual use of forged IDs are prosecutable. |
| Scope of Documents | Includes driver’s licenses, passports, social security cards, visas, green cards, military IDs, and other government-issued IDs. |
| Connection to Other Crimes | Forgery often linked with identity theft, immigration fraud, and financial crimes. |
| Severe Penalties | Penalties can include years of imprisonment and fines. |
6. Conclusion
Federal prosecutions for forgery of government identification documents are robust and aggressive due to the serious threats these crimes pose to public safety, immigration control, and financial systems. Courts emphasize intent, use, and connection to broader schemes when determining charges and penalties.
RELATED Blog
0 comments