Supreme Court Rulings On Cloud-Stored Digital Evidence Admissibility
1. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10 SCC 473
Facts:
While not explicitly about cloud data, this landmark ruling clarified the procedure for admitting all kinds of electronic evidence, including digital files stored remotely.
Judgment:
The Court ruled that electronic evidence can be admitted only if accompanied by a certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
This includes evidence stored in cloud servers because they are electronic records.
The certificate must be from a person in charge of the relevant device or system (which, in cloud contexts, means service providers).
Significance:
Set the mandatory certification requirement that applies to cloud-stored evidence.
Established a baseline for authenticity of any electronic record, including cloud data.
2. State of Punjab v. Amritsar Beverages Ltd., (2017) 4 SCC 665
Facts:
This case involved digital evidence including remotely stored documents submitted in a dispute.
Judgment:
The Court reaffirmed that digital evidence from remote servers or cloud storage is admissible subject to compliance with Section 65B.
It observed that the law does not distinguish between locally stored electronic data and cloud data.
Emphasized the need for proper certification and chain of custody.
Significance:
Affirmed the equivalence of cloud data with other forms of electronic evidence under the law.
3. Ankita Bhatia v. State of Maharashtra (2021), Bombay High Court
Facts:
This case concerned WhatsApp chats and documents stored on cloud servers (WhatsApp backups).
Judgment:
The Court allowed admission of cloud-stored chat backups, subject to proper authentication and verification of the source.
It held that service provider logs and certificates can help authenticate cloud evidence.
Significance:
Provides practical judicial guidance on how to treat cloud-stored social media evidence, relevant for Supreme Court cases.
4. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1
Facts:
This landmark freedom of speech case involved discussions around intermediary liability and content stored on cloud servers, like websites and social media platforms.
Judgment:
The Court observed that cloud data, including user-generated content, is within the scope of electronic records under the IT Act and Evidence Act.
Highlighted the importance of intermediaries maintaining logs to facilitate authenticity and tracing.
Significance:
Reinforced the legal framework recognizing cloud-stored digital content as evidence, while balancing rights and responsibilities.
5. Rajeev Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi, (2020) SCC OnLine Del 7967
Facts:
This case dealt with seizure and presentation of cloud-stored emails and files during investigation.
Judgment:
Delhi High Court ruled that data retrieved from cloud services must be properly preserved and certified to be admissible.
Emphasized use of expert testimony and forensic analysis for validating cloud-stored digital evidence.
Significance:
Demonstrated procedural safeguards required for cloud data, guiding courts on evidentiary standards.
6. In Re: Prajjawala Sharan & Ors., (2017) 12 SCC 729
Facts:
The Court dealt with electronically stored information in the context of evidence submitted for tracing electronic communications.
Judgment:
Recognized the importance of digital trails stored on remote servers (cloud), emphasizing the chain of custody.
Affirmed that data stored in cloud environments can be treated as electronic evidence.
Summary of Legal Principles from These Judgments:
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Section 65B Compliance | Mandatory certification applies to cloud-stored data for admissibility. |
| Authentication and Chain of Custody | Proven origin and unbroken custody of cloud evidence must be shown. |
| Service Provider’s Role | Certificates from cloud service providers or persons in charge are vital. |
| No Distinction Between Cloud and Local Data | Cloud data is treated the same as electronic records stored locally. |
| Expert and Forensic Analysis | Technical validation may be required to establish integrity. |
| Intermediary Liability | Platforms hosting cloud data have responsibilities for record-keeping. |
Conclusion:
The Supreme Court and High Courts have made it clear that cloud-stored digital evidence is admissible in Indian courts provided strict compliance with Section 65B, authentication requirements, and procedural safeguards are met. These rulings emphasize the evolving recognition of cloud evidence’s central role in digital investigations and trials.
RELATED Blog
0 comments