Case Studies On Dna, Fingerprint, And Ballistic Evidence
Case Studies on DNA, Fingerprint, and Ballistic Evidence
Forensic science plays a critical role in modern criminal investigations. Among the most relied-upon methods are DNA analysis, fingerprint identification, and ballistic evidence. Each type of evidence has unique features, strengths, limitations, and legal considerations.
1. DNA Evidence Case Studies
Case 1: People v. Castro (1989, New York)
Background:
The case involved rape allegations where the defendant was linked to the crime scene via blood samples.
The DNA technology at that time was relatively new and its admissibility was contested.
Court Analysis:
The court scrutinized the scientific validity of DNA testing methods, especially PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction).
It emphasized that the laboratory procedures and statistical probability of a match must be clearly presented.
Outcome & Significance:
DNA evidence was eventually admitted under strict conditions, with the court insisting on expert testimony about methodology.
Established that DNA could be highly probative but must meet the Frye/Daubert standards for scientific evidence.
Case 2: State v. Zimmerman (2005, Florida)
Background:
Zimmerman was accused of a violent crime where a partial DNA sample from the crime scene was the main evidence.
Defense argued contamination and improper handling.
Court Analysis:
Court allowed DNA evidence after reviewing chain-of-custody records, laboratory protocols, and the statistical likelihood of a coincidental match.
Highlighted that even partial or degraded DNA can be sufficient if properly analyzed.
Outcome & Significance:
Demonstrated the importance of protocols, documentation, and expert explanation for DNA to be admissible.
DNA evidence became central in convicting or exonerating individuals when eyewitness testimony was weak.
2. Fingerprint Evidence Case Studies
Case 3: United States v. Crisler (1992)
Background:
Crisler was charged with burglary. Fingerprints lifted from the crime scene were alleged to match the defendant.
Defense challenged fingerprint reliability, citing the potential for human error in matching.
Court Analysis:
The court reviewed ACE-V methodology (Analysis, Comparison, Evaluation, and Verification).
Emphasized that fingerprints are unique to each individual and that verification by multiple experts strengthens admissibility.
Outcome & Significance:
Fingerprint evidence was admitted, leading to conviction.
Reinforced the scientific and legal reliability of fingerprints in criminal cases.
Case 4: People v. Wesley (2011, California)
Background:
In a homicide case, fingerprints on a murder weapon were linked to the defendant.
Defense argued partial prints were inconclusive.
Court Analysis:
Court allowed testimony by multiple fingerprint experts, emphasizing level of detail in minutiae points for positive identification.
Partial prints were accepted if the number and type of minutiae were sufficient for individualization.
Outcome & Significance:
Established guidelines for using partial or incomplete fingerprints in court.
Highlighted the need for expert verification and documentation.
3. Ballistic Evidence Case Studies
Case 5: People v. Brown (California, 1991)
Background:
Brown was charged with murder, and a firearm recovered from the scene was tested.
Ballistic analysis linked bullets to the gun using striations and rifling marks.
Court Analysis:
Court admitted testimony from firearm examiners who compared microscopic markings on bullets and cartridge cases.
Defense argued similarity of markings might lead to misidentification.
Outcome & Significance:
Ballistic evidence admitted and contributed to conviction.
Case reinforced the use of microscopic comparison of firearms in linking weapons to crimes.
Case 6: Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993) – Applied in Ballistics
Background:
While not a direct criminal case, this Supreme Court case set the standard for scientific evidence, including ballistics.
Court Analysis:
Courts must evaluate:
Whether the technique can be tested.
Whether it has been peer-reviewed.
Known error rates.
Standardization and acceptance in the scientific community.
Outcome & Significance:
Influences ballistic and other forensic evidence admissibility.
Ensures methodological rigor and reliability are prerequisites for court presentation.
Case 7: State v. Veal (North Carolina, 2010)
Background:
Defendant was charged with armed robbery; bullets recovered were fired from a suspected firearm.
Ballistics matched using NIBIN (National Integrated Ballistic Information Network).
Court Analysis:
Experts explained micro-comparisons between bullets and firearm barrel markings.
Court highlighted the importance of databases in linking weapons across multiple crime scenes.
Outcome & Significance:
Demonstrated ballistics in investigative networking, not just courtroom identification.
Showed how databases reduce errors and aid in identifying patterns of criminal behavior.
Key Takeaways Across Forensic Types
| Forensic Type | Strengths | Limitations | Court Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNA | Highly individual; statistical probability of match | Contamination, partial samples, lab error | Chain of custody, expert testimony, statistical explanation |
| Fingerprints | Unique identifiers, long history of use | Partial prints, human interpretation | Verification by multiple experts, methodology explanation |
| Ballistics | Links weapons to crime; useful for pattern identification | Similarity of marks, examiner bias | Standardized comparison methods, database support, Daubert/Frye standards |
Summary
DNA evidence is powerful but requires strict handling, documentation, and clear statistical explanation.
Fingerprint evidence is widely accepted, but courts now require verification of partial prints and expert methodology.
Ballistic evidence is admissible if experts use accepted methods, databases, and careful microscopic comparison.
RELATED Blog
comments