Bribery In Allocation Of Oil Exploration Rights
Bribery in Allocation of Oil Exploration Rights
Bribery in oil exploration occurs when companies or individuals offer, pay, or receive illicit payments to secure oil rights from governments, local authorities, or state-owned enterprises. This undermines fair competition, violates national and international law, and exposes corporations to criminal and civil liability.
Key Points of Corporate Liability:
Direct bribery: Company executives or agents directly offer bribes to government officials to secure oil concessions.
Indirect bribery: Bribes paid through intermediaries or shell companies to obscure corporate involvement.
Violation of laws:
U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) – prohibits bribery of foreign officials.
UK Bribery Act 2010 – applies to global conduct of UK companies or employees.
National anti-corruption laws in oil-producing countries.
Consequences: Criminal prosecution, civil penalties, debarment from future contracts, reputational damage.
Detailed Case Law Examples
*1. Siemens AG Bribery Case (2008, Global)
Facts:
Siemens, the German multinational, was involved in a global bribery scandal. In the oil sector, Siemens was accused of paying bribes to secure contracts and oil-related technology projects in multiple countries including Nigeria, Venezuela, and Russia.
Charges:
Violation of FCPA (U.S.)
Violation of German anti-corruption laws
Bribery and corruption in allocation of oil exploration and infrastructure contracts
Outcome:
Siemens agreed to pay over $800 million in fines globally.
Several executives faced prison sentences in Germany.
Company implemented anti-bribery compliance programs.
Principle:
Corporations are criminally liable for paying bribes to influence oil rights, even via intermediaries or subsidiaries abroad.
*2. Petrobras Scandal – Operation Car Wash (Lava Jato) (2014–2019, Brazil)
Facts:
Brazil’s state-owned oil company Petrobras was at the center of a massive corruption scheme. Construction firms and oil service providers paid kickbacks to politicians and executives to secure contracts and exploration rights.
Charges:
Bribery of public officials
Money laundering
Fraud against Petrobras
Outcome:
Billions of dollars in fines and restitution.
Executives and politicians were convicted; multinational contractors (e.g., Odebrecht) paid fines and admitted wrongdoing.
Petrobras implemented strict compliance reforms.
Principle:
Even state-owned enterprises can be victims of bribery, and corporate collaborators are liable both criminally and civilly for paying bribes to secure oil concessions.
*3. Halliburton/KBR Nigeria Bribery Case (2009, U.S./Nigeria)
Facts:
Halliburton and its subsidiary KBR were accused of paying millions in bribes to Nigerian officials to secure oil service contracts, including exploration and drilling rights.
Charges:
FCPA violations
Bribery of foreign officials
Failure of internal controls
Outcome:
Paid $579 million in fines to U.S. authorities.
Corporate compliance programs strengthened to prevent bribery in oil allocation processes.
Principle:
Bribery in oil exploration often involves high-value contracts with state officials, and companies can face multimillion-dollar penalties under foreign anti-corruption laws.
*4. Total S.A. Nigeria Bribery Case (2010, France/Nigeria)
Facts:
French oil giant Total was accused of bribing Nigerian officials to secure offshore oil exploration rights. The bribes were allegedly funneled through local agents and shell companies.
Charges:
Bribery of public officials
FCPA violations for U.S.-connected transactions
French anti-corruption laws
Outcome:
Settlement reached with fines and enhanced compliance oversight.
Total implemented global anti-bribery monitoring systems.
Principle:
Companies can be held liable even if bribery occurs through local intermediaries, emphasizing the need for due diligence.
*5. ENI & Shell Nigeria Corruption Investigations (2011–2020, Italy/Nigeria)
Facts:
Italian oil company ENI and Shell were accused of participating in bribery schemes to secure Nigerian offshore exploration rights, particularly the Opl 245 block, allegedly paying hundreds of millions to Nigerian officials and shell entities.
Charges:
Bribery of foreign officials
Money laundering and fraud
Violation of Italian anti-corruption laws
Outcome:
ENI executives were indicted in Italy, with some acquittals and ongoing appeals.
Shell paid fines and faced reputational damage.
Principle:
Cross-border bribery in oil allocation exposes multinational corporations to multi-jurisdictional liability, including criminal prosecution in the home country of the corporation.
*6. Glencore Bribery Case (2018–2019, Africa/UK)
Facts:
Glencore was investigated for bribery of government officials in African countries to secure oil and mining exploration contracts. The bribes were reportedly routed through local agents to influence allocation decisions.
Charges:
UK Bribery Act violations
Facilitation payments
Corruption in allocation of oil concessions
Outcome:
Paid hundreds of millions in fines and settlements.
Introduced stronger anti-bribery and third-party oversight programs.
Principle:
Corporate liability arises from both direct bribery and complicity via agents, especially in sectors like oil where large government contracts are involved.
Key Legal Principles
Multijurisdictional liability: Companies can face prosecution in multiple countries simultaneously.
Direct and indirect bribery: Paying via intermediaries or local agents does not shield corporations from liability.
Severe penalties: Monetary fines often reach hundreds of millions of dollars; executives may face prison.
Compliance obligations: Robust anti-bribery and internal audit systems are essential to mitigate risk.
State-owned enterprises: Bribery of officials or SOEs in oil allocation is a common trigger for corporate liability.
RELATED Blog
comments