Mob Lynching Laws Under Bns
1. Introduction
Mob lynching refers to the act where a group of people collectively attack, harm, or kill an individual outside the judicial process, often fueled by rumors, hate, or vigilantism. This violent phenomenon is a serious threat to rule of law and public order.
With the introduction of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, provisions related to mob violence and lynching are codified to effectively address and punish such acts.
2. Legal Framework under BNS
The BNS incorporates sections equivalent to criminal conspiracy, rioting, unlawful assembly, and culpable homicide.
Specific sections criminalize acts of mob violence, lynching, and public disorder.
Sections analogous to IPC Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149, 153A, and 295A are included with possible enhancements for mob violence.
BNS strengthens penalties and procedural safeguards to deter mob justice.
The law recognizes the need for swift and stringent action against perpetrators and instigators of mob lynching.
3. Elements of Mob Lynching
Unlawful assembly (five or more persons with common object to commit an offense).
Rioting and violence resulting from unlawful assembly.
Use of force or violence leading to death or injury.
Premeditation or spontaneous violence incited by rumor, hatred, or communal tension.
Participation by individuals or groups in the attack.
4. Important Case Laws on Mob Lynching and Mob Violence
Case 1: Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India (2018) 8 SCC 501
Facts: Petition challenging lack of specific anti-lynching law and police inaction in mob violence cases.
Held:
Supreme Court directed states to put in place effective measures to prevent mob lynching.
Emphasized need for sensitive policing, prompt action, and protection of minorities.
Recommended stringent provisions to punish lynching under existing laws.
Importance:
Brought nationwide focus on mob lynching and urged legislative and executive measures.
Case 2: Arup Bhuyan v. State of Assam (2011) 8 SCC 329
Facts: Mass communal violence leading to deaths.
Held:
Court held that leaders and instigators of mob violence must be prosecuted under Sections dealing with unlawful assembly and rioting.
Clarified that culpability extends to all participants under Section 149 IPC (BNS equivalent).
Importance:
Expanded the scope of liability to all mob participants, discouraging vigilantism.
Case 3: Dalbir Singh v. State of Punjab (2012) 2 SCC 378
Facts: Lynching resulting in death during communal unrest.
Held:
Court held that mob lynching amounts to culpable homicide not amounting to murder unless specific intent is proved.
Punishment under Sections equivalent to culpable homicide and rioting with enhanced sentences for group violence.
Importance:
Clarified the nature of offence and appropriate charges in mob lynching.
Case 4: Niharika v. State of UP (2017) SCC Online SC 1254
Facts: Mob violence attack on a Dalit family.
Held:
Court ordered immediate registration of FIRs and stringent investigation.
Highlighted failure of police and administration in preventing lynching.
Stressed effective preventive and punitive measures.
Importance:
Focused on the responsibility of law enforcement in curbing mob lynching.
Case 5: Mohd. Irshad v. State of UP (2018) SCC Online SC 808
Facts: Mob lynching during a protest resulting in death.
Held:
Supreme Court directed the State to frame anti-lynching guidelines.
Emphasized accountability of police, swift action, and victim compensation.
Importance:
Reinforced the administrative and policy response to mob lynching.
Case 6: Prakash Singh v. Union of India AIR 2006 SC 3225
Facts: Addressed police reforms and their role in preventing communal and mob violence.
Held:
Court mandated police accountability, sensitivity training, and independent investigation mechanisms.
Emphasized policing as the first line of defense against mob violence.
Importance:
Though a broader police reform case, it is relevant for controlling mob lynching through improved policing.
5. Key Provisions and Punishments Under BNS
Participation in unlawful assembly with intent to commit offence: Punishable by imprisonment and fine.
Rioting resulting in injury or death: Punishments enhanced for mob-related injuries/deaths.
Culpable homicide not amounting to murder: Applies to lynching cases without premeditated intent.
Section on incitement to violence: Punishes those spreading rumors or inciting mobs.
Vicarious liability for all mob members (similar to IPC Section 149).
Police failure or dereliction leads to departmental action and criminal proceedings.
6. Preventive Measures and Judicial Directions
Timely registration of FIRs and independent investigations.
Proactive policing and community engagement to defuse tensions.
Use of technology like CCTV and social media monitoring to prevent mob mobilization.
Compensation and rehabilitation for victims.
Public awareness campaigns against mob justice.
Strict prosecution of instigators and mob members.
7. Conclusion
Under the BNS framework, mob lynching is treated as a grave criminal offense, combining provisions for unlawful assembly, rioting, and culpable homicide. The judiciary has consistently emphasized:
Strong legal deterrence against lynching.
Collective responsibility of mob members.
The critical role of law enforcement in preventing and investigating such crimes.
Ensuring protection of vulnerable groups against mob violence.
This combined legal and policy approach aims to uphold rule of law, protect human rights, and eradicate vigilantism.
RELATED Blog
0 comments