Corporate Espionage Cyber Prosecutions
🔍 Meaning of Corporate Espionage (Cyber Form)
Corporate Espionage — also called Industrial Espionage — refers to the theft of trade secrets, confidential business data, or intellectual property from a company by another entity (individual, competitor, or foreign government) using cyber means such as hacking, phishing, or malware.
Cyber Corporate Espionage is prosecuted under various laws depending on jurisdiction:
U.S. → Economic Espionage Act (EEA) of 1996 (18 U.S.C. §§ 1831–1839).
U.K. → Computer Misuse Act 1990 and Official Secrets Acts.
Other jurisdictions → local cybersecurity and data protection statutes.
The prosecutions often involve:
Hacking company servers to steal proprietary designs, formulas, or customer lists.
Selling or transmitting the stolen data to a competitor or foreign entity.
Using insider employees who collaborate with hackers.
⚖️ Detailed Case Studies of Corporate Espionage Cyber Prosecutions
1. United States v. Su Bin (Boeing Case, 2014–2016)
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court, Central District of California
Facts:
Su Bin, a Chinese businessman, conspired with Chinese military hackers to steal sensitive defense-related information from Boeing and other aerospace companies. The hackers gained access to Boeing’s networks and exfiltrated design and performance data of the C-17 military transport aircraft and F-22 and F-35 fighter jets.
Method:
Phishing emails and remote intrusion tools.
Theft of gigabytes of confidential data later transmitted to China.
Outcome:
Su Bin was arrested in Canada in 2014, extradited to the U.S.
In 2016, he pleaded guilty to conspiring to steal trade secrets.
Sentenced to 46 months imprisonment and fined.
The case highlighted state-sponsored corporate espionage through cyber means.
2. United States v. Anthony Levandowski (Waymo vs. Uber, 2020)
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Facts:
Anthony Levandowski, a former Google engineer working on self-driving technology (Waymo), downloaded over 14,000 confidential files before joining Uber’s self-driving division.
Though initially framed as a civil case (Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies), it evolved into a federal criminal trade secret theft prosecution under the EEA.
Outcome:
Levandowski pleaded guilty to theft of trade secrets.
Sentenced to 18 months in federal prison (later pardoned by U.S. President Donald Trump).
Demonstrated how digital data transfer can constitute cyber espionage within corporate competition.
3. United States v. Xiaolang Zhang (Apple Autonomous Vehicle Case, 2018–2022)
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Facts:
Zhang, an Apple employee working on its secretive autonomous car project, downloaded confidential design documents and data from Apple’s internal servers before attempting to fly to China to work for a competitor.
Method:
Used his Apple credentials to access proprietary hardware schematics and technical manuals.
Transferred the files to his wife’s laptop for export.
Outcome:
Arrested at San Jose International Airport in 2018.
Pleaded guilty in 2022 to theft of trade secrets.
Awaiting sentencing (expected up to 10 years).
Case shows insider threats combined with cyber-enabled theft.
4. United States v. Huawei Technologies Co. & Employees (2019–Present)
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
Facts:
Huawei and several of its employees were accused of stealing trade secrets from T-Mobile USA relating to its smartphone testing robot, "Tappy."
Employees allegedly photographed, measured, and even stole parts of T-Mobile’s robot, using cyber channels to transmit the data to China.
Outcome:
U.S. indicted Huawei on multiple charges including corporate espionage and obstruction of justice.
The case remains ongoing, with continuing diplomatic and legal implications.
It underscores the intersection of corporate competition and national security cyber theft.
5. United States v. Sinovel Wind Group Co. Ltd. (A123 Systems Case, 2018)
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin
Facts:
Sinovel, a Chinese wind turbine manufacturer, conspired to steal source code for wind turbine control software from U.S. company A123 Systems (American Superconductor Corp).
A Sinovel employee bribed a software engineer to copy proprietary source code and transfer it to Chinese servers.
Outcome:
Sinovel was convicted in 2018 of trade secret theft and wire fraud.
Ordered to pay $59 million in restitution and fines.
It was a landmark case showing how cyber-enabled insider access can devastate a technology company.
6. United States v. Dongfan “Greg” Chung (Boeing Engineer Case, 2009)
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court, Central District of California
Facts:
Chung, a naturalized U.S. citizen working for Boeing, copied thousands of pages of proprietary space and defense technology documents and transmitted them to the People’s Republic of China over several years.
Method:
Physical and electronic theft; stored sensitive digital data at home.
Materials included space shuttle and Delta IV rocket technology.
Outcome:
Convicted under the Economic Espionage Act (18 U.S.C. §1831).
Sentenced to 15 years in federal prison.
It was the first conviction under the EEA for economic espionage on behalf of a foreign government.
7. United States v. Hao Zhang (Skyworks and Avago Case, 2020)
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Facts:
Hao Zhang, a Chinese professor, was charged with stealing trade secrets from U.S. semiconductor companies Skyworks Solutions and Avago Technologies.
He and co-conspirators created a Chinese firm using the stolen RF filter designs essential for smartphones.
Outcome:
Convicted in 2020 of economic espionage and trade secret theft.
Faced up to 15 years imprisonment.
Demonstrated long-term, covert cyber data transfers to establish competing companies abroad.
🧩 Key Legal Principles Emerging from These Cases
Economic Espionage Act (EEA) criminalizes theft of trade secrets with intent to benefit foreign entities (Section 1831) or for commercial advantage (Section 1832).
Insider Threats + Cyber Tools → Most corporate espionage combines internal employees with digital exfiltration methods.
Cross-border Dimension → Many cases involve foreign nations or corporations (China, Russia).
Digital Evidence like email trails, network logs, and cloud transfers are central to convictions.
Corporate Penalties → Companies can be criminally liable (as in Sinovel).
🏁 Conclusion
Corporate Espionage Cyber Prosecutions have evolved into a major pillar of national and commercial security law.
Courts treat cyber-enabled theft of intellectual property as a serious economic and security threat.
The above cases—Su Bin, Levandowski, Zhang, Sinovel, Huawei, Chung, and Hao Zhang—illustrate how prosecutors worldwide are using modern digital forensics and international cooperation to deter and punish corporate data theft.
RELATED Blog
0 comments