No Accused Can Be Denied Right To Legal Representation
The principle that no accused can be denied the right to legal representation,
Right to Legal Representation for the Accused
1. Fundamental Principle
The right to legal representation is a fundamental aspect of the right to a fair trial and is guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. It ensures that every accused person, irrespective of the nature of the offense, social status, or financial capacity, has access to a lawyer to defend themselves in the legal process.
2. Constitutional Basis
Article 21 of the Indian Constitution: Guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, which has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to include the right to legal aid and representation.
Article 22(1): Provides the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of one’s choice during criminal proceedings.
Directive Principles of State Policy (Article 39A): Mandates that the state provide free legal aid to ensure that justice is not denied by reason of economic or other disabilities.
3. Scope of the Right
The accused has the right to be informed of their right to counsel at the time of arrest and interrogation.
The accused can choose their own lawyer, or, if unable to afford one, the state must provide free legal aid.
The right covers all stages: from investigation, trial, appeal, to revision.
Denial of legal representation amounts to violation of the principles of natural justice and fair trial.
4. Consequences of Denial
If the accused is denied legal representation, the court may:
Declare the trial vitiated or unfair.
Order a retrial or acquittal, depending on the circumstances.
Denial undermines the principles of equality and fairness in criminal justice.
Important Case Laws on Right to Legal Representation
1. Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar, AIR 1979 SC 1369
Held:
The right to legal aid is part of the fundamental right to a fair trial under Article 21.
Poor prisoners awaiting trial must be given legal representation free of cost.
Delay in providing legal representation violates the right to life and liberty.
2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597
Held:
Right to life under Article 21 includes the right to fair procedure.
Legal representation is an essential element of fair procedure.
Any denial of this right is unconstitutional.
3. Khatri v. State of Bihar, AIR 1981 SC 928
Held:
Accused should be provided with legal aid at the earliest possible stage.
Failure to do so would be a ground to set aside the conviction.
4. State of Punjab v. Ram Singh, AIR 1964 SC 287
Held:
The right to be defended by a legal practitioner is a statutory and constitutional right.
No accused can be forced to face trial without legal assistance.
5. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1997 SC 610
Held:
Arresting authorities must inform the arrested person about their right to legal representation.
Arrest memo must mention that the accused was informed of their right to a lawyer.
Access to a lawyer during interrogation is a fundamental safeguard.
6. Joginder Kumar v. State of UP, AIR 1994 SC 1349
Held:
The police must inform the accused of their right to legal counsel.
Denial of this right renders any subsequent confession or statement liable to be discarded.
Summary
The right to legal representation is a cornerstone of the criminal justice system, ensuring fairness, justice, and protection of individual liberty.
This right is constitutional, statutory, and judicially recognized.
Denying an accused access to a lawyer violates principles of natural justice and can lead to miscarriage of justice.
The courts have repeatedly emphasized the mandatory nature of this right and the duty of the state to provide legal aid when necessary.
RELATED Blog
0 comments