Cryptocurrency Fraud In India
🔹 Cryptocurrency Fraud in India: Overview
What is Cryptocurrency Fraud?
Cryptocurrency fraud refers to deceptive or illegal activities involving digital currencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, or others. This includes:
Ponzi schemes and fraudulent Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs)
Fake exchanges or wallets
Phishing attacks to steal crypto-assets
Money laundering via cryptocurrencies
Market manipulation and insider trading in crypto-assets
Why is Cryptocurrency Fraud a Concern in India?
Cryptocurrency is largely unregulated in India.
Its anonymous and decentralized nature makes tracing transactions difficult.
Investors, often unaware of risks, fall prey to scams.
Regulatory uncertainty causes confusion on legal remedies.
🔹 Legal and Regulatory Landscape in India
No specific cryptocurrency law yet.
RBI (Reserve Bank of India) banned banks from dealing with crypto firms in 2018 (later struck down by Supreme Court in 2020).
Government proposed a cryptocurrency bill aiming to ban private cryptos but allow state-backed digital currency.
Fraud cases are often prosecuted under:
Indian Penal Code (IPC) (Sections 420 - cheating, 406 - criminal breach of trust)
Information Technology Act, 2000 (cybercrime provisions)
Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)
Investigation agencies like CBI, ED, and Economic Offences Wing get involved.
🔹 Key Cases on Cryptocurrency Fraud in India
1. In re: Market Manipulation in Cryptocurrency Trading (RBI vs. Internet Users, 2018-2020)
Facts:
RBI issued a circular in April 2018 banning banks from dealing with crypto exchanges.
Crypto exchanges challenged this in the Supreme Court, claiming the ban was arbitrary.
Ruling:
In 2019, Supreme Court stayed the ban.
In 2020, Supreme Court struck down the RBI circular, terming it unconstitutional for violating fundamental right to trade.
Significance:
Though not about fraud, this judgment indirectly impacted cryptocurrency regulation.
The ruling empowered crypto exchanges but also emphasized the need for proper regulations to protect users from fraud.
2. The OneCoin Scam Investigation
Facts:
OneCoin was a global Ponzi scheme disguised as a cryptocurrency.
Many Indian investors were defrauded by OneCoin promoters.
Enforcement Directorate (ED) and Economic Offences Wing (EOW) arrested promoters and began investigations.
Legal Actions:
FIRs registered under IPC sections 420 (cheating), 406 (criminal breach of trust), and PMLA.
Multiple raids and asset seizures.
Significance:
This case exposed the modus operandi of cryptocurrency Ponzi schemes.
It also prompted government calls for clearer crypto regulation.
3. Bitconnect Case
Facts:
Bitconnect, another global crypto Ponzi, had several Indian investors.
After the platform shut down, many investors lost money.
FIRs filed in various states against promoters for cheating.
Legal Proceedings:
Police invoked IPC sections 420, 406, and IT Act provisions.
Arrests of promoters and intermediaries.
Significance:
Highlighted the vulnerability of Indian investors to international crypto scams.
Law enforcement agencies began cooperating internationally to trace fraudsters.
4. FIR against Crypto Exchange “Coinome” (2021)
Facts:
Coinome, an Indian cryptocurrency exchange, was accused of fraudulent withdrawals and misappropriation of funds.
Users alleged that the exchange closed trading abruptly, locking their funds.
Legal Action:
Several FIRs were lodged for cheating and criminal breach of trust.
Police investigations initiated.
Significance:
Demonstrated risks even with Indian exchanges.
Emphasized the need for exchanges to follow strict compliance and transparency norms.
5. Investigation into “GainBitcoin” Fraud (2019)
Facts:
GainBitcoin, a crypto investment platform, was accused of running a Ponzi scheme.
Promoters promised high returns but allegedly cheated investors of crores.
Court Proceedings:
Several cases filed for cheating and criminal breach of trust.
Enforcement Directorate probed money laundering aspects.
Outcome:
Arrests made.
Recovery processes initiated to return funds.
6. Crypto Fraud Complaint in Delhi High Court (2020)
Facts:
A group of investors filed a writ petition in Delhi HC alleging fraud by a crypto trading platform promising high returns.
Legal Questions:
Whether cryptocurrency exchanges fall under existing securities regulation.
Investor protection mechanisms in the absence of specific crypto laws.
Outcome:
Delhi HC called for regulatory clarity.
Directed government to expedite formulation of crypto regulations.
🔹 Key Legal Principles Emerging from These Cases
Investor Protection is Crucial: Courts and agencies have emphasized safeguarding investors through proper investigation and prosecution.
Criminal Laws Applicable: In the absence of crypto-specific laws, cheating, breach of trust, and cybercrime provisions are used.
International Cooperation Needed: Many scams involve foreign actors, requiring cross-border coordination.
Need for Clear Regulations: Judicial and executive authorities push for clear regulatory frameworks balancing innovation with consumer safety.
Role of Technology: Digital forensic capabilities are vital for investigation and tracing crypto transactions.
🔹 Conclusion and Future Outlook
Cryptocurrency fraud cases in India reveal the urgent need for robust crypto regulation.
Existing laws are used but have limitations in addressing novel challenges posed by blockchain and crypto-assets.
Courts have played a vital role in protecting investors, but a dedicated law for cryptocurrencies is essential.
India's approach is evolving, balancing technological innovation, consumer protection, and economic interests.
RELATED Blog
0 comments