Prosecution Of Forced Marriages, Early Marriages, And Customary Abductions
Prosecution of Forced Marriages, Early Marriages, and Customary Abductions
Forced marriages, early marriages, and customary abductions are severe violations of international human rights law and can also fall under the scope of international criminal law, particularly in conflict zones. These practices often involve coercion, violence, and the denial of the victims' rights to freedom, choice, and bodily autonomy. While these abuses primarily affect women and girls, they also represent broader issues of gender inequality, cultural traditions, and societal norms that perpetuate violence and discrimination.
This section explores the prosecution of forced marriages, early marriages, and customary abductions through the lens of international law and case law, illustrating how these practices have been prosecuted and the challenges that remain in addressing them.
1. The Case of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) – Jean-Paul Akayesu (1998)
Case Summary:
Jean-Paul Akayesu, the former mayor of Taba, was tried by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) for his role in the 1994 Rwandan genocide. One of the significant aspects of the case was the prosecution's focus on sexual violence, including forced marriages and rape. Akayesu was accused of facilitating and inciting the forced marriage of Tutsi women to Hutu soldiers, as part of the wider genocidal campaign to destroy the Tutsi population.
Legal Accountability:
Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity: Akayesu was convicted of genocide and crimes against humanity, including sexual violence. The forced marriages were part of the broader strategy to destroy the Tutsi ethnic group. The forced marriages in this case were considered a form of sexual slavery, as the women involved were coerced into sexual relations without consent.
Court’s Findings: This case was significant in the way it expanded the understanding of sexual violence under international criminal law. The ICTR recognized that forced marriages and sexual violence could be prosecuted as genocide, as they were intended to destroy the targeted group, in this case, the Tutsi community.
Impact: The Akayesu case was the first time an international tribunal explicitly recognized that rape and sexual violence, including forced marriages, could be prosecuted as acts of genocide. This ruling set a key precedent for future cases involving sexual violence in armed conflict.
2. The Case of the Bosnian War – The Trial of Dario Kordić (ICTY, 2001)
Case Summary:
Dario Kordić, a Croatian politician and military leader, was involved in the ethnic cleansing campaigns during the Bosnian War (1992-1995). One of the brutal strategies employed by Kordić's forces was the forced displacement of Bosnian Muslims, which often included abductions, sexual violence, and forced marriages. The systematic sexual violence included abducting Muslim women and girls, subjecting them to forced marriages and sexual slavery.
Legal Accountability:
Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes: Kordić was convicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) for his role in war crimes and crimes against humanity. The charges included the abduction of women and girls, and the forced marriages of these women to soldiers and commanders, as part of the strategy of ethnic cleansing.
Court’s Ruling: The tribunal found that forced marriages and sexual violence, even if not always explicitly listed as "forced marriages," were integral parts of the broader scheme of terrorizing and humiliating the civilian population. The court recognized that these actions were not isolated incidents but were coordinated and widespread, affecting numerous women.
Impact: Kordić's conviction was a significant step in the prosecution of gender-based violence during war. It further solidified that forced marriages, as part of a larger strategy of ethnic cleansing and violence, could be prosecuted as war crimes and crimes against humanity. This case also set important precedents for the legal treatment of sexual violence in conflict zones.
3. The Case of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) and the Prosecution of Joseph Kony (ICC)
Case Summary:
The Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), led by Joseph Kony, is notorious for abducting children, particularly girls, during the Ugandan Civil War (1987-2006). The LRA would force young girls into marriages with fighters, subject them to sexual violence, and use them as "wives" or "sex slaves" for the commanders. The LRA’s brutal practices involved systematic abductions and forced marriages, making it one of the most notorious cases of sexual slavery in contemporary conflicts.
Legal Accountability:
Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes: Joseph Kony, as the leader of the LRA, has been indicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for his role in these abductions, forced marriages, and sexual slavery. The charges against him include the forced marriage of young girls, enslavement, and sexual violence, which are considered serious war crimes under the Rome Statute of the ICC.
The ICC’s Approach: The ICC’s indictment emphasized the importance of prosecuting forced marriages as part of a broader pattern of sexual violence and exploitation. In the case of the LRA, forced marriages were not only tools of terror but also mechanisms to control and brutalize the population, particularly girls and women.
Legal Impact: While Kony remains at large, the charges against him have shed light on the prevalence of forced marriages and abductions as part of armed group strategies. This case reinforced the international community’s stance that forced marriages, as part of conflict-related violence, should be treated as war crimes under international law.
4. The Case of the Sierra Leone Civil War – The Trial of Issa Hassan Sesay (SCSL, 2009)
Case Summary:
Issa Hassan Sesay was a senior member of the Revolutionary United Front (RUF), which was responsible for horrific crimes during the Sierra Leone Civil War (1991-2002). One of the most egregious crimes involved the abduction and forced marriage of young girls, who were subjected to sexual violence and used as "wives" for RUF commanders. These girls were abducted during attacks on villages, forced into marriages with RUF fighters, and often subjected to repeated sexual abuse.
Legal Accountability:
Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes: In 2009, Issa Hassan Sesay was convicted by the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The charges included the forced marriage and sexual enslavement of women and girls, as well as other forms of sexual violence and abduction.
Court’s Ruling: The court emphasized that forced marriages, along with sexual violence and enslavement, were central to the strategy of the RUF in terrorizing and demoralizing the population. The court held that such acts were part of a systematic campaign of violence designed to control and oppress civilians.
Impact: The conviction of Sesay marked a key moment in the recognition of forced marriages as a serious crime under international law. It underscored that forced marriages, especially in the context of armed conflicts, were not only violations of women’s rights but also significant components of broader war crimes and crimes against humanity.
5. The Case of the 2014 Boko Haram Abductions – The Chibok Girls (Nigeria)
Case Summary:
In April 2014, the Nigerian militant group Boko Haram abducted 276 schoolgirls from the town of Chibok in northern Nigeria. The group was known for using abductions to force young girls into marriages with its fighters, often using violent methods to coerce the girls into accepting the forced marriages. While many of the Chibok girls were eventually freed, the case highlighted the ongoing use of forced marriages and abductions by armed groups in the region.
Legal Accountability:
War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity: Boko Haram’s actions, including the forced abduction and marriage of young girls, fall under war crimes and crimes against humanity. While there has been no major international trial involving specific prosecutions of Boko Haram commanders for these abductions, the international community, through the United Nations and regional bodies, has condemned these acts as serious violations of international law.
Human Rights Violations: The abduction of the Chibok girls and their forced marriages to Boko Haram fighters represent widespread and systematic violations of the rights of women and children. International law, including the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), emphasize the protection of women and children from such abuses, and these crimes are frequently classified as human trafficking and enslavement.
Impact on International Law: The Chibok abductions brought attention to the increasing use of abductions and forced marriages by non-state armed groups, particularly in West Africa. It has led to calls for stronger international efforts to address these practices through both legal mechanisms and preventive measures.
Conclusion
The prosecution of forced marriages, early marriages, and customary abductions has been increasingly recognized as part of the broader efforts to combat sexual violence and human trafficking in conflict zones. The cases discussed above illustrate how these crimes are prosecuted under international criminal law, such as the Rome Statute and the jurisprudence of ad hoc tribunals like the ICTR and ICTY. The legal precedents set by these cases emphasize that forced marriages, abductions, and sexual slavery are not only violations of human rights but also war crimes and crimes against humanity. These cases have been pivotal in shaping the international legal framework for prosecuting gender-based violence, though challenges remain in terms of enforcement and accountability, especially with non-state actors and ongoing conflicts.
0 comments