Electronic Evidence
Introduction to Electronic Evidence
Definition:
Electronic evidence includes any data or information stored, received, or transmitted in electronic form, such as emails, text messages, computer files, social media posts, or digital transaction records.
Legal Basis in India:
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Amended 2000)
Section 65A: Admissibility of electronic records.
Section 65B: Conditions for proving electronic records as evidence.
Key Requirements for Admissibility:
Must be authentic and unaltered.
Proper certification under Section 65B (a certificate from the person in charge of the device/system).
Must establish chain of custody.
1. State of Punjab v. Amritsar Singh (1999) – Early Recognition of Electronic Evidence
Background:
In this case, the prosecution relied on computer-generated records to prove financial transactions.
The defense challenged their authenticity.
Legal Proceedings:
The court examined the process of data generation and storage.
Judgment:
Held that electronic records can be admissible if they meet the criteria of authenticity and reliability.
Significance:
Recognized computer evidence as reliable, laying the foundation for Sections 65A and 65B.
Introduced the need for expert verification of electronic records.
2. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer (2014) – Supreme Court Landmark Case
Background:
Involved emails and CD records presented as evidence in a property dispute.
Defense claimed that the electronic records were not properly certified.
Legal Proceedings:
Court examined the requirements under Section 65B IPC for admissibility.
Judgment:
Supreme Court ruled that electronic evidence without a proper Section 65B certificate is inadmissible, even if genuine.
The certificate must specify the origin, integrity, and method of storage of the data.
Significance:
Landmark judgment establishing mandatory compliance with Section 65B.
Ensures electronic evidence is credible and verifiable.
3. Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2018)
Background:
Involved text messages and WhatsApp chats used to prove criminal conspiracy.
Defense argued lack of authentication and questioned the chain of custody.
Legal Proceedings:
Court analyzed how the evidence was extracted, preserved, and submitted.
Judgment:
Held that proper certification and chain of custody are crucial.
Electronic evidence must be directly linked to the device and extracted in a legally accepted manner.
Significance:
Reiterated Section 65B compliance.
Highlighted the need for forensic expertise in handling mobile-based evidence.
4. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003)
Background:
Involved medical records maintained digitally in a hospital, alleged to prove negligence.
Legal Proceedings:
Court examined computerized hospital records, focusing on reliability and authenticity.
Judgment:
Court accepted properly maintained electronic medical records as evidence.
Emphasized accuracy, completeness, and tamper-proof storage.
Significance:
Extended electronic evidence principles to professional and civil contexts.
Established that digitally stored professional records are admissible with proper certification.
5. State v. Naresh Kumar (Cyber Fraud Case)
Background:
Naresh Kumar allegedly committed bank fraud using online banking credentials.
Investigation relied on emails, transaction logs, and server records.
Legal Proceedings:
Court analyzed transaction logs from the bank’s servers, verifying digital signatures and IP addresses.
Judgment:
Electronic records were admitted under Sections 65A and 65B.
Conviction secured based on authenticated bank server logs and emails.
Significance:
Demonstrated the importance of digital trails in cybercrime prosecution.
Reinforced that server logs, emails, and other digital records can directly support criminal liability.
6. Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2020) – High Court & Supreme Court
Background:
Case involved digital evidence related to property transactions.
Issue: Whether email and scanned documents could be admitted without proper 65B certification.
Legal Proceedings:
Court clarified that Section 65B certification is mandatory for electronic evidence.
Judgment:
Supreme Court confirmed the principles of Anvar P.V.
Emphasized that non-compliance leads to inadmissibility, even if the evidence appears genuine.
Significance:
Reinforced strict adherence to Section 65B.
Highlighted the need for careful procedural compliance when presenting digital evidence.
7. Ram Prakash vs. Union of India (2011) – Email and SMS Evidence
Background:
Emails and SMS were used to establish conspiracy in a recruitment scam.
Legal Proceedings:
Court examined extraction, authentication, and chain of custody of electronic records.
Judgment:
Evidence admitted as it was authenticated by competent authority and properly preserved.
Highlighted the role of service providers in verification.
Significance:
Established that mobile and email records are admissible with proper authentication.
Strengthened reliance on forensic evidence in cybercrime.
Key Observations Across Cases
Legal Framework:
Indian Evidence Act Sections 65A & 65B are central.
Certification under Section 65B is mandatory for admissibility.
Types of Electronic Evidence:
Emails, text messages, WhatsApp chats
Computer logs, bank transactions, digital medical records
Social media posts, server logs, scanned documents
Challenges in Admissibility:
Authentication and integrity
Chain of custody
Tampering or alteration concerns
Judicial Trends:
Courts strictly enforce Section 65B compliance.
Forensic expertise is critical for verifying authenticity.
Electronic evidence can be decisive in both civil and criminal cases.
RELATED Blog
comments