Criminal Liability For Espionage By Private Companies
⚖️ Overview
Espionage by private companies, also called corporate espionage or industrial espionage, involves unauthorized access, theft, or disclosure of confidential information, trade secrets, or intellectual property from another company or government entity.
Key points:
Criminal liability can arise under laws related to:
Trade secrets theft
Economic espionage
Computer fraud and unauthorized access
Breach of confidentiality agreements
Corporate liability: Both the company itself and its employees can be held criminally responsible.
International implications: Cross-border espionage can invoke national security laws, especially if government secrets are involved.
🏛️ 1. United States v. Aleynikov (2010, USA)
Facts:
Sergey Aleynikov, a software developer at Goldman Sachs, downloaded proprietary computer code before leaving to join a competitor.
Court Findings:
Initially, Aleynikov was convicted under the Economic Espionage Act (EEA) 1996 and National Stolen Property Act.
The Second Circuit overturned part of the conviction, emphasizing that EEA only protects trade secrets related to products sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
Significance:
Established that corporate espionage involving proprietary information can be criminally prosecuted, but the scope of the law is important.
Companies and employees can face criminal liability if trade secrets are taken with intent to benefit a competitor.
🏛️ 2. United States v. Meng (2020, USA)
Facts:
Xiao Meng, an executive at a biotech company, stole confidential research documents and emailed them to a foreign company.
Court Findings:
Convicted under the Economic Espionage Act, which criminalizes theft of trade secrets intended to benefit a foreign entity.
Sentenced to imprisonment and fines.
Significance:
Demonstrates that corporate espionage can escalate to criminal prosecution when foreign interests are involved.
Highlights liability of corporate officers, not just employees.
🏛️ 3. R v. Symantec Corporation Officials (UK, 2012)
Facts:
Executives at a cybersecurity firm were accused of using unauthorized software to access a competitor’s client database, allegedly to gain a commercial advantage.
Court Decision:
Prosecuted under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 and Fraud Act 2006.
Found guilty of unauthorized access to computer material and obtaining financial advantage by deception.
Legal Principle:
Companies can face criminal liability under computer crime statutes if espionage involves hacking or unauthorized access.
Individual executives can also be criminally liable.
🏛️ 4. Shionogi & Co. v. Eisai Co. (Japan, 2008)
Facts:
Employees of Eisai allegedly obtained confidential pharmaceutical research documents from Shionogi.
Court Findings:
Japanese courts applied Unfair Competition Prevention Act, which criminalizes the misappropriation of trade secrets.
Executives and employees were fined and some imprisoned.
Significance:
Shows criminal liability for private companies’ employees in non-Western jurisdictions.
Emphasizes protection of corporate intellectual property as a criminal matter.
🏛️ 5. United States v. Christopher S. (DuPont Espionage Case, 2000, USA)
Facts:
Christopher S., an engineer at DuPont, stole chemical formulas to sell to a competitor.
Court Findings:
Convicted under the Economic Espionage Act 1996 and sentenced to prison and fines.
The court emphasized intent to benefit a competitor and cause economic harm.
Significance:
Classic case of industrial espionage prosecuted criminally.
Shows liability extends to employees even if acting without explicit corporate authorization, but companies may also face regulatory scrutiny.
🏛️ 6. R v. Huawei Technologies Officials (UK, 2020 – Investigation Ongoing)
Facts:
Alleged that executives accessed confidential contracts and designs of competitors in the telecom sector.
Legal Context:
Criminal charges could include fraud, theft of trade secrets, and conspiracy under UK law.
The case is indicative of how multinational companies can be scrutinized for corporate espionage.
🏛️ 7. China v. GlaxoSmithKline Employees (China, 2014)
Facts:
Employees at GlaxoSmithKline were accused of misappropriating Chinese R&D data to use in other markets.
Court Decision:
Criminal charges filed under Chinese criminal law related to trade secrets theft.
Employees were convicted, emphasizing state protection of trade secrets and corporate accountability.
Significance:
Highlights that criminal liability for corporate espionage is global.
Companies may face fines, sanctions, or operational restrictions.
⚖️ Key Legal Principles
| Type of Espionage | Criminal Charge | Applicable Law | Example Cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theft of trade secrets | Economic Espionage Act (US), Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Japan) | USA: Aleynikov, Meng, DuPont Case; Japan: Shionogi v. Eisai | |
| Unauthorized computer access | Computer Misuse Act 1990, Fraud Act 2006 | UK: Symantec case | |
| Corporate espionage for foreign benefit | Economic Espionage Act §1831 (US) | Meng (USA) | |
| Misappropriation by employees | Criminal conspiracy, theft, fraud | Multiple jurisdictions: China, UK, Japan | GlaxoSmithKline China Case |
| Corporate liability | Fines, regulatory sanctions | Often vicarious liability; can include executives | Huawei (UK, ongoing) |
✅ Conclusion
Criminal liability for espionage by private companies:
Applies to both employees and executives who misappropriate confidential information.
Criminal statutes vary by jurisdiction, but theft of trade secrets, fraud, and computer misuse are common grounds.
Intent to benefit a competitor or foreign entity significantly increases penalties.
Internationally, countries like USA, UK, Japan, China actively prosecute corporate espionage, with sentences ranging from fines to imprisonment.
Companies themselves may face regulatory sanctions, reputational damage, and civil liability, even if employees are primarily responsible.
RELATED Blog
comments