Synthetic Credit Identity Prosecutions
1. United States v. Irey, 612 F.3d 1160 (11th Cir. 2010)
Facts:
The defendants created synthetic identities by combining stolen Social Security numbers with fictitious names.
They used these identities to open credit card accounts and accumulate debt.
Legal Issue:
Whether using partially real identities constitutes identity theft and bank fraud under federal law.
Outcome:
Convictions upheld for wire fraud, identity theft, and bank fraud.
Key point: Synthetic identities using real SSNs are treated as seriously as traditional identity theft under U.S. law.
2. United States v. Hutchinson, 675 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 2012)
Facts:
Hutchinson and associates obtained legitimate SSNs of minors and fabricated names to apply for credit cards.
Accounts were charged off, causing financial institutions significant losses.
Legal Issue:
Fraudulent use of personal information of real individuals for financial gain.
Outcome:
Convicted of mail and wire fraud, identity theft, and conspiracy.
Sentences ranged from 5–10 years in federal prison.
Key point: Using minors’ SSNs in synthetic identities attracts severe penalties.
3. United States v. Griffin, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102345 (E.D. Va.)
Facts:
Griffin created synthetic identities combining real SSNs with fake addresses and names.
He opened multiple credit card accounts, defaulted on payments, and laundered proceeds through shell companies.
Legal Issue:
Bank fraud and conspiracy to commit identity theft.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 7 years in prison, plus restitution to victims.
Key point: Laundering proceeds of synthetic credit fraud can elevate charges to conspiracy and money laundering.
4. United States v. Smith, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125476 (D. Md.)
Facts:
Smith used synthetic identities to obtain loans from online lenders.
Used stolen Social Security numbers combined with fake personal information.
Legal Issue:
Wire fraud, bank fraud, and aggravated identity theft.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 6 years in prison with full restitution.
Key point: Online lenders are frequent targets of synthetic identity fraud, and federal prosecutors treat online fraud seriously.
5. United States v. Taylor, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67891 (N.D. Ill.)
Facts:
Taylor created hundreds of synthetic identities using a mix of real and fabricated data.
Accounts were used to fraudulently obtain personal loans and credit lines.
Legal Issue:
Conspiracy to commit wire fraud, identity theft, and bank fraud.
Outcome:
Convicted on all counts; sentenced to 8 years in federal prison and ordered to pay over $1 million in restitution.
Key point: Large-scale synthetic identity operations are treated as organized fraud schemes, often prosecuted as conspiracies.
6. United States v. Gomez, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143210 (S.D.N.Y.)
Facts:
Gomez created synthetic identities to apply for credit cards and fraudulent tax refunds.
Used a combination of stolen real SSNs and fake personal details.
Legal Issue:
Wire fraud, identity theft, and filing false tax claims.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 7 years in prison and ordered restitution for financial institutions and IRS.
Key point: Synthetic identity fraud can involve multiple types of crimes, including tax fraud.
Legal Takeaways from These Cases:
Definition: Synthetic identity fraud often combines real identifiers (SSNs) with fabricated personal details.
Prosecution: Offenses prosecuted under wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud, and identity theft statutes.
Penalties: Prison sentences typically range from 5–10 years; restitution is often required.
High Risk for Minors and Vulnerable Individuals: Using minors’ SSNs or stolen identities increases criminal liability.
Scale Matters: Large-scale operations may trigger conspiracy, money laundering, or multi-count charges.
RELATED Blog
0 comments