Constitutional Reforms For Future Afghan Criminal Justice System
1. Farkhunda Malikzada Case (2015)
The tragic lynching of Farkhunda Malikzada, a young woman falsely accused of burning the Quran, highlighted significant flaws in Afghanistan's criminal justice system. The initial trial was criticized for its speed and lack of due process. Subsequent appeals and retrials, including the reduction of sentences for those convicted, underscored the need for reforms to ensure fair trials and accountability.
2. Murder of Farkhunda Malikzada (2015)
In 2015, Farkhunda Malikzada was lynched by a mob in Kabul after being falsely accused of burning a Quran. The case drew national and international attention, leading to public outcry and demands for justice. The initial trial was criticized for its speed and lack of due process. Subsequent appeals and retrials, including the reduction of sentences for those convicted, underscored the need for reforms to ensure fair trials and accountability.
3. Case of Serdar Mohammed (2010)
Serdar Mohammed, an Afghan national, was detained by British forces in 2010. The UK High Court ruled that his detention violated Afghan law, as he was not brought before a judge within the required timeframe. This case highlighted issues related to arbitrary detention and the importance of adhering to legal standards, emphasizing the need for reforms to protect detainee rights and ensure legal compliance.
4. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs v Rahmatullah (2012)
In this UK case, Yunus Rahmatullah, a Pakistani national, was detained in Iraq and later transferred to Afghanistan. The UK Supreme Court ruled that his detention and transfer violated international law, including Afghan legal principles. This case underscored the importance of respecting national sovereignty and legal standards, highlighting the need for reforms to ensure compliance with both domestic and international legal obligations.
5. Baad Practice in Tribal Justice
The practice of "baad," where a female from a criminal's family is given to the victim's family as settlement, remains prevalent in certain tribal areas of Afghanistan. Despite being illegal under Afghan law, many victims are unaware of their rights or are prevented from exercising them. This practice highlights the gap between formal legal frameworks and traditional justice systems, emphasizing the need for reforms to bridge this divide and protect vulnerable individuals.
Proposed Constitutional Reforms
To address these challenges and build a robust criminal justice system, the following constitutional reforms are proposed:
Strengthening Judicial Independence: Ensure that the judiciary operates free from political interference, allowing for impartial adjudication of cases.
Guaranteeing Fair Trials: Enshrine the right to a fair trial, including access to legal representation, timely hearings, and the presumption of innocence.
Protecting Human Rights: Explicitly prohibit practices like "baad" and other forms of gender-based violence, ensuring equal protection under the law for all citizens.
Promoting Legal Awareness: Implement educational programs to inform citizens of their legal rights and remedies, bridging the gap between formal and informal justice systems.
Enhancing Accountability Mechanisms: Establish independent bodies to investigate and prosecute cases of judicial misconduct, corruption, and human rights violations.
These reforms aim to create a criminal justice system that upholds the rule of law, protects human rights, and fosters public trust. By addressing historical injustices and aligning with international legal standards, Afghanistan can build a justice system that serves all its citizens equitably.
RELATED Blog
0 comments