Private Prosecution Under Bnss
Definition:
Private prosecution is a legal action initiated by a private individual or entity who is not a public prosecutor or police officer. Under the Indian legal system, typically the State prosecutes criminal offenses through public prosecutors. However, a private person can initiate prosecution in certain circumstances when the State fails to act.
Legal Basis:
Section 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 empowers a Magistrate to take cognizance of an offense upon receiving a complaint from any person.
Section 196 of CrPC requires that certain offenses can only be prosecuted on the complaint of the victim or a specific authority.
The police or public prosecutor can take over or discontinue the private prosecution at any stage.
Significance:
Private prosecution provides a remedy to victims or aggrieved parties when the police refuse to investigate or file a case.
It acts as a check on police negligence or misuse of discretion.
Important Features of Private Prosecution:
Initiated by a private individual or complainant.
Requires filing a complaint before the Magistrate.
Subject to the discretion of the Magistrate to take cognizance.
Police or State can take over or discontinue the case.
Generally not applicable for offenses which must be tried only on public complaint or police report.
Detailed Case Laws on Private Prosecution:
1. R. vs. Bidhi Chandra Roy, AIR 1954 Cal 1
Facts: The petitioner initiated a private prosecution for an offense, alleging the police failed to investigate.
Issue: Whether the private prosecution can continue despite police opposition.
Held: The court ruled that private prosecution is a constitutional right but it is subject to the control of the court and police. The police can take over the prosecution at any stage and discontinue it if found frivolous.
Significance: Affirmed the right to private prosecution but highlighted the supervisory role of the police and court to prevent abuse.
2. Sanjay Dutt vs. State through CBI, AIR 1994 SC 1349
Facts: A private complaint was filed in a high-profile criminal case alleging failure of police investigation.
Issue: Can the court allow a private prosecution when the public prosecutor has refused to act?
Held: The Supreme Court held that the court may permit a private prosecution if there is sufficient ground to believe that the public prosecution is negligent or biased.
Significance: Emphasized the importance of private prosecution as a remedy when official prosecution fails.
3. Ranjit D. Udeshi vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1965 SC 881
Facts: This case involved a private complaint under obscenity laws.
Issue: Whether private prosecution can be allowed in cases involving public morality.
Held: The Supreme Court allowed private prosecution but stressed that it should not be frivolous or vexatious.
Significance: Laid down the principle that private prosecutions should be pursued in good faith and must be backed by sufficient evidence.
4. State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal, AIR 1992 SC 604
Facts: The case related to the abuse of power by the police in initiating false prosecutions.
Issue: Role of private prosecution and safeguards against misuse.
Held: The Supreme Court held that courts should ensure private prosecutions are genuine and not motivated by malice or personal vendetta.
Significance: Introduced safeguards to prevent misuse of private prosecution, including requiring Magistrate’s prior approval and evidence scrutiny.
5. S.N. Mishra vs. Director of Enforcement, AIR 1967 SC 1513
Facts: Private prosecution was initiated for economic offenses.
Issue: Whether private prosecution can be initiated in cases involving complicated investigation.
Held: The court held that private prosecution is permissible but it is advisable that complicated economic offenses be handled by the State machinery.
Significance: Private prosecution is available but practical difficulties might necessitate State involvement.
Summary of the Position:
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Who can initiate? | Any private person aggrieved by an offense (not a police officer or public prosecutor). |
| When to initiate? | When police/public prosecutor refuses or delays action. |
| How to initiate? | File a complaint under Section 190 CrPC before Magistrate. |
| Can police intervene? | Yes, police can take over or discontinue the prosecution. |
| Court’s role | Courts supervise to prevent misuse and frivolous prosecution. |
Practical Examples of Private Prosecution:
A victim of theft where police refuse to file FIR.
Defamation case filed by a person against a media outlet.
Complaints of obscenity where the police do not act.
Cases involving moral turpitude where public interest is involved.
RELATED Blog
0 comments