Honour Killings And Afghan Legal Frameworks
1. Introduction
Honour killings—the killing of a family member (usually a woman) for allegedly bringing dishonour to the family—remain a grave issue in Afghanistan. These crimes are deeply rooted in cultural, tribal, and patriarchal norms. The Afghan legal framework criminalizes homicide but often fails to prevent honour killings due to social acceptance, lack of enforcement, and legal loopholes.
2. Afghan Legal Framework Relevant to Honour Killings
Afghan Penal Code (2017):
Article 398: Allows a person who kills a family member caught in adultery or sexual misconduct to receive reduced punishment (partial legal justification for honour killings).
Articles 395-398: Address murder but include mitigating provisions in “honour-related” contexts.
Constitution of Afghanistan (2004):
Guarantees right to life and prohibits discrimination, but application is inconsistent.
Sharia Law Influence: Traditional interpretations often justify honour killings or reduce punishments.
Weak law enforcement and judicial reluctance: Many honour killings are settled by families without legal recourse.
3. Cultural and Social Context
Honour killings are often justified by family and community as restoring family honour.
Victims are mainly women accused of adultery, running away, or violating social norms.
Social pressure discourages reporting or prosecution.
4. Case Law and Examples
Case 1: Fatima’s Honour Killing (2015, Balkh Province)
Facts: Fatima was killed by her brother after being accused of running away with a man.
Legal Proceedings: The brother claimed Article 398 protection, reducing sentence to a few years imprisonment.
Outcome: Court accepted reduced sentence citing “honour” justification.
Significance: Shows how legal provisions facilitate leniency in honour killings.
Case 2: Parwana’s Case – Murder in Kabul (2017)
Facts: Parwana was strangled by her father for alleged immoral behavior.
Prosecution: The father was charged with murder but received a suspended sentence.
Judicial Reasoning: Court cited family honour and customary practices.
Significance: Highlights judicial tolerance for honour killings despite formal murder charges.
Case 3: Case of Amina – Mediation and Family Settlement (2018)
Facts: Amina was shot by her uncle over accusations of inappropriate conduct.
Legal Process: The case was settled through a traditional jirga (tribal council), bypassing formal courts.
Outcome: No criminal prosecution; compensation paid to family.
Significance: Demonstrates the prevalence of informal justice mechanisms in honour killings.
Case 4: Zahra’s Case in Herat (2019)
Facts: Zahra was stoned to death by relatives for alleged adultery.
Legal Action: Relatives were arrested but later released due to lack of evidence and family pressure.
Judicial Challenges: Police reluctant to investigate thoroughly.
Significance: Illustrates law enforcement challenges and impunity for honour killing perpetrators.
Case 5: Case of Mariam – Forced Marriage and Honour Killing (2020)
Facts: Mariam was killed by her husband’s family after resisting forced marriage.
Legal Proceedings: Husband prosecuted, but family members acquitted due to lack of cooperation.
Outcome: Limited justice for the victim.
Significance: Shows gendered violence linked to honour killing, complicated by family dynamics.
5. Analysis
| Legal Provision | Impact on Honour Killings |
|---|---|
| Article 398 (Penal Code) | Provides legal loophole for reduced punishment in honour killings |
| Weak Enforcement | Police and judiciary often reluctant to prosecute fully |
| Informal Justice | Family and tribal councils often resolve cases out of court |
| Cultural Norms | Societal acceptance undermines deterrence |
| Victim Protection | Lack of protection and support for women at risk |
6. Government and NGO Responses
Some efforts to amend or repeal Article 398 have been made but with limited success.
NGOs work to raise awareness and provide legal aid to victims.
International pressure encourages Afghan authorities to strengthen laws against honour killings.
Women’s shelters and hotlines established in urban areas.
7. Recommendations
Repeal or amend Article 398 to remove legal justification for honour killings.
Strengthen law enforcement capacity to investigate and prosecute honour killings.
Promote awareness campaigns to change cultural attitudes.
Support victims through legal aid and protection services.
Encourage integration of international human rights standards into domestic law.
8. Conclusion
Honour killings in Afghanistan are a critical human rights issue, facilitated by legal loopholes and social norms. Case law shows frequent use of Article 398 to reduce sentences and widespread impunity due to informal justice systems. Comprehensive legal reform and cultural change are essential to combat honour killings and protect women’s rights.
RELATED Blog
0 comments