Insider Trading Using Social Media Analysis
1. United States v. Mathew Martoma
Background:
Mathew Martoma was a hedge fund portfolio manager accused of insider trading involving information about clinical trial results for a pharmaceutical drug.
Facts:
While this case did not directly involve social media as the source of insider information, investigators heavily used social media and electronic communications to piece together how Martoma obtained the inside info. They analyzed emails, text messages, and social media interactions between Martoma and the insiders.
Charges:
Securities fraud
Insider trading
Outcome:
Martoma was convicted and sentenced to nine years in prison.
Significance:
This case shows how social media and electronic communication metadata can be crucial in proving knowledge and intent in insider trading cases.
2. United States v. David B. Bonar
Background:
David Bonar was charged with insider trading in relation to stock of a healthcare company.
Facts:
Bonar used information he allegedly gathered from an executive via LinkedIn and other social media platforms, where he had connections, to trade on non-public earnings information.
Charges:
Insider trading
Securities fraud
Outcome:
Bonar pled guilty to insider trading charges.
Significance:
This case highlights the increasing role of professional social media platforms like LinkedIn as sources of potential insider communication and intelligence.
3. SEC v. Raj Rajaratnam
Background:
Raj Rajaratnam was head of the Galleon Group hedge fund and involved in a massive insider trading scandal.
Facts:
Investigators used advanced analysis of social media posts, emails, and instant messages to detect coded language and patterns used to conceal insider trades. Social media monitoring helped trace communication trails.
Charges:
Insider trading
Securities fraud
Outcome:
Rajaratnam was convicted and sentenced to 11 years in prison.
Significance:
This case illustrates how social media and electronic communication analysis can help prosecutors uncover complex insider trading networks.
4. United States v. Alexander D. Stubblebine
Background:
Stubblebine, an investment advisor, was prosecuted for insider trading based on information he received through informal social media contacts.
Facts:
The prosecution demonstrated that Stubblebine obtained non-public earnings information through private messages on social platforms and used it for trading.
Charges:
Insider trading
Securities fraud
Outcome:
He was convicted and sentenced to prison.
Significance:
This case points to the risks of trading on information obtained through private social media communications, and how such platforms are scrutinized in investigations.
5. SEC v. Michael G. Steinberg
Background:
Steinberg was charged with insider trading involving a biotech company.
Facts:
Social media analysis showed Steinberg’s connections with company insiders and how information was shared via encrypted messaging apps linked to social media accounts.
Charges:
Insider trading
Securities fraud
Outcome:
He pled guilty and cooperated with the government.
Significance:
This case demonstrates how social media networks are examined for relationships and communication that facilitate insider trading.
Key Points on Social Media’s Role in Insider Trading Prosecutions:
Evidence Gathering: Social media posts, messages, and metadata provide vital evidence about communication between insiders and traders.
Pattern Detection: Analyzing posts or private messages helps detect coded language or suspicious patterns that indicate illicit information sharing.
Relationship Mapping: Social media profiles reveal personal and professional connections that might facilitate insider information flow.
Risk Areas: Private messaging apps integrated with social media (like Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp) complicate detection but are increasingly monitored legally.
Legal Precedent: Courts have upheld the use of social media data as admissible evidence in proving insider trading and intent.
RELATED Blog
0 comments