Digital Harassment At Workplace
What is Digital Harassment at Workplace
Digital harassment at the workplace refers to the use of electronic communication tools—such as emails, social media, messaging apps, or other digital platforms—to harass, intimidate, or humiliate an employee. It includes acts like:
Sending offensive or inappropriate messages or images.
Cyberstalking or repeated unwanted digital contact.
Spreading rumors or defamation online.
Using workplace digital tools to bully or discriminate.
Sharing private or confidential information without consent.
Legal Framework Addressing Digital Harassment at Workplace
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act): Covers sexual harassment, which can include digital forms like emails, messages, or social media.
Indian Penal Code (IPC), Sections 354A, 507, 509: Deal with sexual harassment, criminal intimidation, and insult to modesty.
Information Technology Act, 2000, Sections 66A (now struck down but replaced by other provisions), 66E, 67: Address electronic communication offences.
Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946: Can be invoked for workplace misconduct.
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Section 65B: For electronic evidence admissibility.
Employer’s Responsibilities:
Establish internal Complaints Committee (ICC) under POSH Act.
Conduct training and awareness on digital harassment.
Take prompt action on complaints.
Protect victim from retaliation.
Important Case Laws on Digital Harassment at Workplace
1. Apparel Export Promotion Council v. A.K. Chopra, AIR 1999 SC 625
Facts: The Supreme Court recognized sexual harassment at the workplace as a violation of fundamental rights (Article 21).
Held: Employers have a duty to provide a safe workplace free from sexual harassment, which includes digital harassment.
Significance: Foundation case emphasizing employer responsibility for harassment prevention, applicable to digital context.
2. Medha Kotwal Lele & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (2013) W.P. No. 337/2012
Facts: Petitioners raised concerns over inadequate implementation of the POSH Act, including digital harassment complaints.
Held: Supreme Court reiterated the need for strict enforcement of POSH Act and internal complaints committees.
Significance: Reaffirmed the importance of addressing all forms of sexual harassment, including digital means.
3. Vishaka & Others v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011
Facts: Landmark judgment on sexual harassment at the workplace.
Held: Laid down guidelines for employers to prevent sexual harassment, applicable to digital harassment as well.
Significance: Legal basis for workplace harassment policies, including digital harassment.
4. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1
Facts: Struck down Section 66A of IT Act for being vague.
Held: Emphasized protecting freedom of speech while preventing misuse of technology for harassment.
Significance: Important for balancing digital harassment laws and free speech online.
5. State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Balu, (1998) 8 SCC 646
Facts: Case involving misuse of telecommunication services for harassment.
Held: Court held that such misuse can be penalized under IPC and IT Act.
Significance: Extends to digital harassment at workplace via electronic communications.
6. Rajesh Sharma v. State of UP & Ors., (2017) 8 SCC 667
Facts: The Supreme Court gave guidelines on proper functioning of Internal Complaints Committees.
Held: Emphasized prompt investigation and confidentiality.
Significance: Applicable for handling complaints of digital harassment effectively.
7. Poonam Rani v. State, (2013) 9 SCC 178
Facts: Involved electronic evidence in sexual harassment cases.
Held: Highlighted the importance of electronic evidence (like emails, messages) under Section 65B for prosecution.
Significance: Stresses on police and judiciary accountability in handling digital evidence related to harassment.
Summary
| Aspect | Description | Legal Principle / Case Law |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Harassment via digital means at workplace | POSH Act, IPC Sections 354A, 509, IT Act Sections 66, 67 |
| Employer Duties | Safe work environment, ICC, awareness | Vishaka Guidelines, Rajesh Sharma |
| Electronic Evidence | Proper preservation & admissibility | Section 65B Evidence Act, Poonam Rani |
| Police Accountability | Prompt investigation, evidence handling | Poonam Rani case |
| Balance of Rights | Protect free speech, prevent misuse | Shreya Singhal judgment |
Practical Takeaway:
Victims should report digital harassment immediately.
Employers must have clear digital harassment policies.
Digital evidence must be preserved with care and certified under Section 65B.
Courts require a balanced approach respecting free speech but cracking down on harassment.
RELATED Blog
comments