Forensic Science Application In Criminal Trials
Introduction
Forensic science is the application of scientific methods and techniques to investigate crimes and gather evidence admissible in court. It enhances the fact-finding process by providing objective, scientific data that can corroborate or refute witness testimony and other evidence.
Types of Forensic Evidence Commonly Used
DNA analysis (identification of suspects and victims)
Fingerprint analysis
Ballistics (gunshot residue, bullet trajectories)
Toxicology (poisoning, substance identification)
Digital forensics (computers, mobile phones)
Forensic pathology (cause of death)
Document examination (forged signatures, handwriting analysis)
Importance in Criminal Trials
Establish identity of suspects and victims.
Corroborate witness statements.
Disprove alibis or claims.
Establish timeline and sequence of events.
Assist in determining modus operandi.
Important Case Laws on Forensic Science Application
1. State of Punjab v. Ram Singh, AIR 2005 SC 2371 — India
Facts:
Accused was charged with murder based on circumstantial evidence and forensic analysis.
The forensic report included DNA evidence linking the accused to the crime scene.
Judgment:
Supreme Court held that DNA evidence is a powerful tool and can form the basis for conviction if reliability is established.
Court emphasized the need for proper chain of custody and accredited laboratory results.
Significance:
Affirmed the admissibility and importance of DNA profiling in criminal trials.
Set guidelines for evaluating forensic evidence.
2. People v. Castro, 545 N.Y.S.2d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989) — USA
Facts:
Conviction based on DNA evidence from a rape case.
Defense challenged the reliability of DNA testing procedures.
Judgment:
Court scrutinized the methodology and lab procedures.
Highlighted need for rigorous scientific standards and expert testimony explaining forensic evidence.
Significance:
Stressed the scientific rigor needed for forensic evidence to be accepted.
Led to reforms in forensic lab accreditation and quality control.
3. R v. Doheny (1997), 3 All ER 741 — UK
Facts:
Case involved forensic toxicology in a murder trial.
Dispute arose over interpretation of toxicology reports.
Judgment:
Court ruled that expert testimony on forensic results must be clear and within the expert’s competence.
Established caution in over-reliance on forensic evidence without proper interpretation.
Significance:
Highlighted role of expert witness in guiding court on forensic findings.
Set precedent for admissibility standards in UK courts.
4. Commonwealth v. Lanigan, 425 Mass. 543 (Massachusetts, 1997)
Facts:
DNA evidence was used to connect the accused to a sexual assault case.
Defense challenged the validity of lab results.
Judgment:
Court accepted DNA evidence after confirming proper lab protocols.
Reaffirmed that DNA evidence is highly reliable when proper procedures are followed.
Significance:
Supported the increasing use of forensic DNA testing in criminal justice.
5. Katrina Armstrong v. The State, (Nigeria, 2014)
Facts:
Case involved forensic fingerprint analysis to identify the accused in a burglary case.
Defense disputed the fingerprint match.
Judgment:
Court accepted fingerprint expert evidence.
Highlighted need for scientific validation and clear explanation to jury.
Significance:
Reinforced fingerprint evidence as reliable when matched through accepted forensic methods.
6. Nirbhaya Case, Mukesh & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi, (2017) — India
Facts:
The 2012 Delhi gang rape case relied heavily on forensic evidence including DNA profiling, autopsy reports, and forensic pathology.
Judgment:
Supreme Court upheld death sentences based on overwhelming forensic and circumstantial evidence.
Forensic reports played a critical role in confirming the accused’s involvement.
Significance:
Demonstrated forensic science’s decisive role in high-profile criminal cases.
Emphasized integration of forensic evidence with other investigative elements.
7. State of Kerala v. Rajesh AIR 2001 SC 1947 — India
Facts:
Case involved forensic examination of firearm residues in a homicide case.
Disputed whether accused fired the weapon.
Judgment:
Court accepted ballistic forensic evidence confirming accused’s involvement.
Underlined necessity of accurate forensic examination in weapon-related crimes.
Significance:
Enhanced credibility of ballistic evidence in prosecution.
Challenges in Using Forensic Science in Trials
| Challenge | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Chain of custody issues | Evidence must be preserved from contamination or tampering. |
| Quality of forensic labs | Lack of accreditation affects reliability of results. |
| Interpretation errors | Misinterpretation can mislead courts. |
| Expert witness credibility | Varies based on expertise and bias. |
| Cost and accessibility | Advanced forensic tests may be expensive and unavailable. |
Best Practices for Effective Use of Forensic Evidence
Ensure strict adherence to chain of custody.
Use accredited laboratories with standardized protocols.
Cross-examine forensic experts thoroughly.
Provide jury with clear, non-technical explanations.
Combine forensic evidence with other investigative findings.
Summary Table
| Case | Jurisdiction | Forensic Evidence Used | Key Outcome/Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| State of Punjab v. Ram Singh | India | DNA Profiling | Set standards for DNA evidence admissibility |
| People v. Castro | USA | DNA Testing | Emphasized scientific rigor in forensic labs |
| R v. Doheny | UK | Toxicology | Caution on expert interpretation of forensic data |
| Commonwealth v. Lanigan | USA | DNA Evidence | Reaffirmed DNA reliability with proper procedures |
| Katrina Armstrong v. The State | Nigeria | Fingerprint Analysis | Validated fingerprint evidence when properly done |
| Nirbhaya Case (Mukesh v. State) | India | DNA, Autopsy, Forensic Pathology | Highlighted forensic role in conviction and sentencing |
| State of Kerala v. Rajesh | India | Ballistics (firearm residue) | Strengthened ballistic evidence in homicide cases |
Conclusion
Forensic science plays an indispensable role in modern criminal trials, providing objective, scientific evidence that strengthens prosecution and defense cases alike. Courts worldwide recognize its value but also emphasize the importance of proper procedures, expert testimony, and safeguarding the rights of the accused.
Judicial precedents underline the evolving standards for admissibility, reliability, and interpretation of forensic evidence, making it a cornerstone of contemporary criminal justice systems.
RELATED Blog
0 comments