Preliminary Inquiry Before Fir Registration
What is FIR?
FIR (First Information Report) is a written document prepared by the police when they receive information about the commission of a cognizable offence. Registration of FIR is the first step in the criminal justice process.
What is Preliminary Inquiry (Pre-FIR Inquiry)?
A Preliminary Inquiry is a fact-finding investigation conducted by the police or magistrate before registering an FIR. The purpose is to verify whether the information given discloses a cognizable offence or if the complaint is frivolous, vague, or baseless.
Is Preliminary Inquiry Mandatory Before FIR?
Generally, NO: The Supreme Court of India has repeatedly held that there is no legal requirement for the police to conduct any inquiry before registering an FIR if the information discloses a cognizable offence.
However, in some cases, preliminary inquiry may be allowed or necessary to prevent abuse of the process or to ascertain facts in complex situations.
Why Does Preliminary Inquiry Arise?
To prevent misuse of police machinery in false or vexatious complaints.
To protect reputation or interest of persons falsely implicated.
To avoid police harassment.
When the complaint lacks clarity or prima facie evidence.
Important Case Law on Preliminary Inquiry Before FIR Registration
1. Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of UP (2014) – Mandatory Registration of FIR
Facts:
The Supreme Court considered whether the police must register FIR immediately on receiving information about a cognizable offence.
Issue:
Is it mandatory for police to register FIR upon receiving information about cognizable offence without preliminary inquiry?
Holding:
The Court held that registration of FIR is mandatory if the information discloses a cognizable offence.
Preliminary inquiry before registration of FIR is not required.
Exceptions are there where the information is vague, vague, or anonymous.
Significance:
FIR registration is a statutory right of the complainant.
Police cannot refuse or delay FIR registration.
Prevents police from acting as gatekeepers.
2. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992) – Guidelines to Curb Abuse of Police
Facts:
The petitioner alleged misuse of police power by registering FIRs to harass political opponents.
Issue:
Can police register FIR without preliminary inquiry, and can courts intervene in such cases?
Holding:
The Supreme Court laid down guidelines to prevent abuse:
Courts can quash FIR if the complaint is frivolous, motivated, or mala fide.
Preliminary inquiry is allowed before FIR registration if police think complaint is vague or not credible.
However, no absolute bar on FIR registration without inquiry.
Significance:
Established guidelines for preliminary inquiry.
Balanced complainant’s right to FIR and protection against malicious complaints.
3. Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) – Arrest and FIR Registration
Facts:
The court dealt with wrongful arrests based on FIRs registered without proper inquiry.
Issue:
Whether police should conduct preliminary inquiry before registering FIR to avoid unnecessary arrests.
Holding:
Emphasized the need for police to be cautious before registering FIR and arresting.
Recommended basic verification before action to prevent misuse.
However, not a strict requirement to delay FIR registration.
Significance:
Promotes responsibility on police to avoid harassment.
Suggests some inquiry but does not mandate it for FIR registration.
4. S. Mukherjee v. Union of India (1990) – FIR Registration and Judicial Review
Facts:
Petitioner complained police refused to register FIR.
Issue:
Can courts direct police to register FIR without inquiry?
Holding:
The court held:
Police have a duty to register FIR when complaint discloses a cognizable offence.
Courts can direct police to register FIR if police refuse without valid reason.
Preliminary inquiry cannot be used as a tool to delay or deny FIR.
Significance:
Reinforces right to FIR registration.
Judicial safeguard against police denial.
5. Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat (2004) – Sensitive Cases and Preliminary Inquiry
Facts:
The Court dealt with sensitive cases (e.g., communal violence) where preliminary inquiry was done before FIR.
Issue:
Whether preliminary inquiry is permissible in sensitive cases to verify facts before FIR.
Holding:
Court allowed limited preliminary inquiry by senior officers or magistrates in sensitive matters.
The inquiry should be fair, objective, and quick.
Should not delay FIR unnecessarily.
Significance:
Shows flexibility in approach.
Balances public interest and rights of complainants.
6. Mohd. Anwar v. State of M.P. (2004) – Power of Magistrate to Direct FIR Registration
Facts:
Magistrate directed police to register FIR after complaint.
Issue:
Can magistrate direct police to register FIR without preliminary inquiry?
Holding:
Magistrates have power to order FIR registration.
Preliminary inquiry cannot override magistrate’s direction.
Ensures judicial control over police discretion.
Significance:
Courts act as guardians of citizens’ rights.
Limits arbitrary police action.
Summary of Legal Position:
| Aspect | Position as per Case Law |
|---|---|
| Mandatory FIR registration | If complaint discloses cognizable offence (Lalita Kumari) |
| Preliminary inquiry | Not mandatory, but allowed in exceptional cases (Bhajan Lal) |
| Police discretion | Should not refuse or delay FIR without valid reason |
| Court intervention | Courts can direct FIR registration if police refuse |
| Sensitive cases | Limited inquiry may be allowed but should be prompt |
| Magistrate power | Magistrate can direct FIR registration |
Conclusion
Filing an FIR is a fundamental right.
Police must register FIR immediately if the complaint discloses a cognizable offence.
Preliminary inquiry is not a statutory requirement but can be done to prevent misuse.
Courts play a vital role in ensuring police do not misuse discretion.
The balance between preventing false complaints and ensuring access to justice is maintained through judicial guidelines.
RELATED Blog
0 comments