Medical Malpractice Prosecutions
What Constitutes Medical Malpractice Prosecution?
Civil malpractice: Usually a patient sues for damages alleging negligence.
Criminal malpractice: Prosecutors bring criminal charges when malpractice involves gross negligence, reckless behavior, or intentional harm.
Criminal liability requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, unlike civil cases.
Charges can include manslaughter, criminal negligence, assault, or even murder in rare cases.
Why Are Criminal Prosecutions Rare?
Medical errors can be unintentional and complex.
Medicine inherently involves risks; not all adverse outcomes amount to criminal conduct.
Prosecutors must prove that the provider’s conduct was reckless or grossly negligent beyond ordinary malpractice.
Important Cases in Medical Malpractice Prosecutions
1. State v. Becker (1997, Pennsylvania)
Issue: Criminal negligence leading to patient death.
Facts:
Dr. Becker was charged with involuntary manslaughter after a patient died due to a surgical error during a procedure that he negligently performed.
Outcome:
Dr. Becker was convicted. The court held that gross deviation from the standard of care causing death could constitute criminal negligence.
Significance:
This case set a precedent in Pennsylvania that grossly negligent medical conduct can result in criminal liability.
2. Commonwealth v. Parke-Davis (2001, Massachusetts)
Issue: Criminal charges related to drug side effects and failure to warn.
Facts:
The pharmaceutical company Parke-Davis was prosecuted for knowingly withholding information about dangerous side effects of a drug, which led to patient harm and deaths.
Outcome:
The company pleaded guilty to criminal charges and paid fines.
Significance:
Though not a direct malpractice case against a physician, this highlighted criminal accountability in healthcare when corporate misconduct leads to patient harm.
3. People v. Brockett (2007, California)
Issue: Criminal manslaughter by a physician.
Facts:
Dr. Brockett was prosecuted for criminally negligent homicide after a patient died due to his failure to properly diagnose and treat a life-threatening condition.
Outcome:
Dr. Brockett was acquitted after the defense successfully argued that the medical error did not rise to criminal negligence.
Significance:
This case illustrates the high burden of proof in criminal malpractice cases, distinguishing between error and criminal conduct.
4. State v. Brown (2012, Ohio)
Issue: Criminal prosecution of a nurse for medication error.
Facts:
Nurse Brown administered a fatal overdose of medication, leading to patient death.
Outcome:
She was convicted of reckless homicide.
Significance:
This case demonstrated that non-physician healthcare workers can also face criminal charges for grossly negligent acts causing death.
5. United States v. Satcher (2015, Federal Court)
Issue: Criminal charges against a physician for Medicare fraud and resulting patient harm.
Facts:
Dr. Satcher was charged with fraudulently billing Medicare and providing substandard care resulting in patient injuries.
Outcome:
Convicted on fraud charges; although criminal malpractice was not the primary charge, the case emphasized the link between fraudulent conduct and patient safety risks.
Significance:
It highlighted how criminal prosecution can arise from both medical negligence and associated fraudulent behavior.
6. People v. Wu (2018, New York)
Issue: Criminal negligence causing infant death.
Facts:
Dr. Wu was prosecuted for criminally negligent homicide after failing to recognize fetal distress during childbirth, leading to neonatal death.
Outcome:
Convicted, with the court ruling the conduct amounted to reckless disregard for patient safety.
Significance:
The case reinforced that failure to act on clear signs of distress in urgent medical situations can lead to criminal liability.
Summary Table: Key Cases and Legal Principles
| Case | Jurisdiction | Charge/Issue | Outcome | Legal Principle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State v. Becker | Pennsylvania | Involuntary manslaughter | Convicted | Gross negligence causing death can be criminally liable. |
| Commonwealth v. Parke-Davis | Massachusetts | Failure to warn, corporate misconduct | Guilty plea, fines | Corporations criminally liable for patient harm. |
| People v. Brockett | California | Criminal manslaughter by physician | Acquitted | High burden to prove criminal negligence vs. error. |
| State v. Brown | Ohio | Reckless homicide (nurse) | Convicted | Nurses and other providers can face criminal charges. |
| United States v. Satcher | Federal | Medicare fraud & patient harm | Convicted (fraud) | Fraud linked to patient safety risks can result in prosecution. |
| People v. Wu | New York | Criminally negligent homicide | Convicted | Failure to act on urgent medical signs can lead to criminal liability. |
Conclusion
Criminal prosecutions for medical malpractice remain relatively rare and challenging due to the complexity of medical practice and high standards of proof. However, courts and prosecutors increasingly hold healthcare professionals and entities accountable when their gross negligence or willful misconduct causes serious harm or death.
The cases above demonstrate:
The distinction between civil negligence and criminal recklessness.
The possibility of criminal charges against doctors, nurses, and corporations.
The emphasis on protecting patient safety while maintaining fair legal standards.
RELATED Blog
0 comments