Environmental Liability Of Corporations
What is Environmental Liability?
Environmental liability refers to the legal responsibility of individuals, organizations, or corporations for harm caused to the environment. This includes liability for pollution, degradation, or destruction of natural resources due to corporate activities.
Why is Corporate Environmental Liability Important?
Corporations often engage in industrial activities causing air, water, and soil pollution.
Liability ensures accountability and incentivizes sustainable business practices.
It helps in protecting public health and conserving biodiversity.
Environmental liability includes both civil liability (compensation, restoration) and criminal liability (penalties, imprisonment).
Legal Framework in India for Environmental Liability of Corporations
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991
The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010
The Indian Penal Code (IPC), Sections on public nuisance and criminal negligence
Key Concepts
Strict Liability: Corporations may be held liable without proof of negligence (Rylands v. Fletcher principle adopted in India).
Absolute Liability: Expanded strict liability in India, no exceptions allowed for hazardous industries (M.C. Mehta case).
Polluter Pays Principle: The entity causing pollution must bear the cost of remediation.
Important Case Laws on Environmental Liability of Corporations in India
1. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak Case), AIR 1987 SC 1086
Facts: Oleum gas leaked from Shriram Food and Fertilizers factory causing serious environmental damage.
Holding: Supreme Court established the principle of absolute liability for hazardous industries causing environmental harm.
Principle: Corporations engaged in hazardous activities are absolutely liable for any harm caused, regardless of negligence or precautions taken.
Impact: Landmark judgment raising the bar for environmental accountability of corporations in India.
2. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Taj Trapezium Case), AIR 1997 SC 734
Facts: Pollution from industries around Taj Mahal causing damage to the monument.
Holding: Court directed closure or relocation of polluting industries and enforced strict environmental compliance.
Principle: Corporations must not compromise cultural and environmental heritage; polluters are liable to prevent harm.
Impact: Reinforced environmental liability with cultural preservation.
3. Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, AIR 1996 SC 1446
Facts: Toxic waste dumping by chemical industries in Tamil Nadu causing soil and water contamination.
Holding: Supreme Court ordered industries to pay compensation and clean up the damage.
Principle: Polluter pays principle and corporate accountability for environmental restoration.
Impact: Strengthened compensatory remedies against corporations.
4. Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India, AIR 1996 SC 2715
Facts: Pollution from tanneries in Tamil Nadu affecting water bodies.
Holding: Court reaffirmed sustainable development and polluter pays principles.
Principle: Corporations have a duty to ensure their activities do not harm the environment.
Impact: Pioneered the incorporation of sustainable development in Indian environmental jurisprudence.
5. T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (Forest Conservation Case), AIR 1997 SC 1228
Facts: Illegal deforestation by corporations for commercial purposes.
Holding: Court imposed strict environmental liability on corporations cutting forests without approval.
Principle: Corporate responsibility extends to protection of forests and natural habitats.
Impact: Strengthened forest conservation through corporate accountability.
6. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Case, 2013 (Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board v. Sterlite Industries)
Facts: Sterlite’s copper smelting plant was accused of air and water pollution, causing health hazards.
Holding: Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board ordered closure; Supreme Court stayed it initially but emphasized strict environmental compliance.
Principle: Corporate operations must comply with environmental norms or face closure.
Impact: High-profile example of enforcement of environmental liability on corporations.
Summary Table: Environmental Liability of Corporations - Case Law Overview
| Case | Key Principle | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum) | Absolute liability for hazardous industries | Landmark environmental accountability judgment |
| M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Taj) | Environmental protection of heritage sites | Enforced closure of polluting industries |
| Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action | Polluter pays and compensation | Industries ordered to clean toxic waste |
| Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum | Sustainable development and corporate duty | Reinforced eco-friendly corporate practices |
| T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad | Corporate liability for forest conservation | Protected forests against illegal corporate activity |
| Sterlite Industries Case | Enforcement of environmental norms | Closure of polluting plant and corporate compliance focus |
Conclusion
The Indian judiciary has progressively expanded the scope of environmental liability for corporations, adopting stringent standards like absolute liability and polluter pays. Corporations engaging in industrial and commercial activities are held accountable not just for negligence but for any environmental harm caused, irrespective of precautions.
The courts have balanced economic development with environmental protection, reinforcing that corporate profits must not come at the cost of public health and ecological sustainability.
RELATED Blog
0 comments