Prosecution Of Child Exploitation And Grooming Online
Prosecution of Child Exploitation and Online Grooming in India
With the rapid growth of the internet, child exploitation and grooming online have become serious criminal concerns. Indian law addresses these crimes primarily through:
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860
Section 375/376: Sexual offences
Section 292: Obscenity
Section 354C: Voyeurism
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012
Sections 11–18: Sexual assault, harassment, and exploitation
Sections 19–24: Aggravated sexual assault
Section 67B IT Act: Child pornography
Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 66E: Violation of privacy
Section 67B: Publishing or transmitting child pornography
1. State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti (Cyber Stalking & Online Harassment), 2004
Facts:
The accused created a fake Yahoo account in the victim’s name and sent offensive emails to harass her.
This included sexual and defamatory content, leading to immense trauma.
Legal Issues:
Applicability of IT Act provisions for online harassment.
Whether creating a fake account to sexually harass constitutes a criminal offense.
Judgment:
The court convicted Suhas Katti under:
Section 66A (IT Act, 2000) – sending offensive messages online
Section 509 (IPC) – insult to modesty of a woman
The court emphasized that online harassment is as serious as physical harassment.
Significance:
Recognized online grooming and harassment as criminal.
Laid the foundation for future cyber stalking cases.
2. R.K. v. State of Maharashtra (Child Sexual Exploitation Online), 2011
Facts:
A teacher was found exchanging sexually explicit messages with a minor through social media.
Evidence included chat logs and photographs.
Legal Issues:
Whether online sexual communication with a minor falls under POCSO Act.
How digital evidence can be used to prosecute offenders.
Judgment:
The accused was convicted under:
Section 15 (POCSO) – sexual harassment of a child
Section 67B (IT Act) – child pornography
The court held that even consensual chats with a minor are illegal, as the law protects children irrespective of consent.
Significance:
Clarified that digital grooming is punishable under POCSO.
Encouraged law enforcement to trace online communication as evidence.
3. State v. Shubham Kumar, Delhi (2016)
Facts:
The accused circulated child sexual abuse material online, using messaging apps to share images of minors.
Legal Issues:
Liability for possession and transmission of child pornography.
Role of intermediaries (like WhatsApp or email) in such crimes.
Judgment:
Conviction under:
Section 67B (IT Act) – publishing/transmitting child pornography
POCSO Act, Section 14 – aggravated sexual assault (in case of intent to exploit)
The court reinforced that possession alone, with intent to distribute, is sufficient for prosecution.
Significance:
Strengthened online child protection laws.
Demonstrated use of digital forensics in court.
4. In Re: Exploitation of Children in Cyberspace, 2013 (Supreme Court Guidelines)
Facts:
This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) addressed the rise of child pornography and online exploitation in India.
Legal Issues:
Need for guidelines for protection of children online.
Balancing child rights and digital privacy.
Judgment / Direction:
Supreme Court directed:
Internet service providers to block child pornography websites.
Law enforcement to adopt a proactive approach in investigating online grooming.
Use of POCSO and IT Act jointly to prosecute offenders.
Significance:
Landmark in forming a proactive strategy against online child exploitation.
Reinforced state responsibility to protect children online.
5. Shakti Vahini v. Union of India, 2018 (Online Child Trafficking & Grooming)
Facts:
Reports surfaced of children being lured online for trafficking purposes.
Legal Issues:
How to prosecute grooming leading to physical exploitation.
Applicability of POCSO, IPC, and IT Act simultaneously.
Judgment:
Supreme Court emphasized:
Any communication with a child online with intent to sexually exploit is an offense.
Investigations must be speedy and tech-savvy, using chat logs, emails, and social media traces.
Significance:
Strengthened legal protection for children against online predators.
Encouraged digital monitoring and cybercrime cells to prevent exploitation.
6. State v. Ankit Sharma (2019, Delhi)
Facts:
Accused ran a YouTube channel sharing sexualized content involving minors.
Children were forced to perform sexually explicit acts.
Legal Issues:
Applicability of POCSO Act, IPC, and IT Act to streaming content.
Prosecution of grooming and exploitation online.
Judgment:
Convicted under:
Section 67B IT Act – child pornography
Section 14 POCSO – aggravated sexual assault
The court ruled that online streaming is equivalent to distribution, punishable under law.
Significance:
Recognized streaming platforms as potential mediums for child exploitation.
Clarified punitive measures for online grooming leading to abuse.
Key Takeaways
Digital Grooming = Crime: Any sexualized communication with a minor online is punishable.
POCSO + IT Act: Joint application strengthens prosecution.
Electronic Evidence: Chat logs, emails, and browser history are crucial.
Preventive Measures: Blocking websites, monitoring, and awareness campaigns are legally mandated.
Supreme Court’s Role: Guidelines in PILs reinforce state accountability and speedy trials.
RELATED Blog
0 comments