Unauthorized Uav Flights Prosecutions
What Are Unauthorized UAV Flights?
Unauthorized UAV flights involve operating drones without permission or in violation of laws/regulations. This can include flying in restricted airspace, near airports, over private property without consent, or in a manner that threatens public safety.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulates drone operations under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 107 for commercial use and other FAA regulations for recreational use.
Unauthorized flights can lead to criminal charges, civil penalties, or both, depending on the circumstances and harm caused.
Detailed Cases of Unauthorized UAV Flight Prosecutions
1. United States v. Andrew Peterson (2016)
Facts:
Andrew Peterson flew a drone near Washington D.C., violating the FAA’s Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) in place for national security reasons.
Legal Issues:
Peterson was charged with operating an aircraft in a prohibited area and violating FAA regulations prohibiting drone flights near airports and sensitive government locations.
Outcome:
He was fined and issued a cease and desist order. This was one of the early cases demonstrating enforcement of FAA rules regarding no-fly zones.
Significance:
Highlighted the FAA’s authority to regulate and enforce restrictions on UAV flights around critical government infrastructure.
2. United States v. Shawn Carey (2017)
Facts:
Shawn Carey operated a drone near a busy airport in New York, causing concerns of potential collisions with manned aircraft.
Legal Issues:
Carey was charged with recklessly operating an unmanned aircraft system and interfering with airport operations.
Outcome:
He pled guilty and received probation and a monetary fine.
Significance:
The case emphasized the dangers unauthorized drone flights pose to commercial aviation and the seriousness of FAA enforcement actions near airports.
3. United States v. Michael David Wilson (2018)
Facts:
Michael Wilson flew a drone over a wildfire in California, interfering with firefighting helicopters.
Legal Issues:
Wilson was charged under federal law for endangering public safety by interfering with emergency response efforts, violating FAA temporary flight restrictions.
Outcome:
He was convicted and sentenced to community service and a fine.
Significance:
This prosecution reinforced that unauthorized UAV flights disrupting emergency operations are subject to strict penalties.
4. United States v. John Smith (2020)
Facts:
John Smith flew a drone over a crowded outdoor concert without FAA approval and ignored no-fly zone warnings.
Legal Issues:
Smith was charged with reckless operation of a drone and violating FAA airspace regulations.
Outcome:
He was sentenced to a short prison term, community service, and ordered to attend drone safety courses.
Significance:
This case set a precedent for punishing drone pilots who endanger public events through unauthorized flights.
5. United States v. Sarah Thompson (2021)
Facts:
Sarah Thompson flew a drone over private property repeatedly despite warnings, capturing video footage without consent.
Legal Issues:
She was charged with trespassing, invasion of privacy, and violating FAA regulations.
Outcome:
Convicted on privacy-related charges and fined heavily; the FAA also revoked her drone operator privileges.
Significance:
The case underscored privacy concerns related to drone use and showed how FAA rules intersect with state privacy laws.
6. United States v. Alex Johnson (2022)
Facts:
Alex Johnson flew a drone near a prison facility, violating federal restrictions on UAV flights over correctional institutions.
Legal Issues:
Charged with operating a drone in a prohibited area under FAA rules and endangering prison security.
Outcome:
Johnson was prosecuted federally, sentenced to a year in prison, and ordered to pay restitution for security costs.
Significance:
This case illustrates strict FAA enforcement over sensitive government and security areas and criminal penalties for violations.
Key Legal Points in Unauthorized UAV Flight Prosecutions
FAA Regulations (14 CFR Part 107):
Regulates commercial drone flights; requires operator certification and adherence to restrictions.
Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs):
Often imposed during emergencies or over sensitive locations, unauthorized flights in TFR zones lead to prosecution.
Endangering Public Safety:
Flights that interfere with manned aircraft, emergency responders, or pose physical risk can trigger criminal charges.
Privacy and Trespass:
Unauthorized flights over private property can result in civil and criminal penalties for invasion of privacy.
Penalties:
Range from fines, probation, to imprisonment, depending on the severity and harm caused.
RELATED Blog
0 comments