Section 246 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, (BSA), 2023
Section 246 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 pertains to the rules and provisions related to admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts. The BSA, 2023 is a legislation that governs the use and acceptance of electronic records, digital signatures, and various forms of electronic communication within legal contexts.
The specific section deals with the circumstances under which electronic records can be accepted as evidence and provides the legal framework for ensuring their authenticity, integrity, and reliability. Here's a breakdown of some case scenarios in the context of Section 246:
Case 1: Email Correspondence as Evidence
Scenario: A dispute arises between two business partners regarding a contract, and one of the partners presents email exchanges as evidence.
Application of Section 246: Email communication, being an electronic record, can be considered admissible as evidence, provided it meets certain criteria:
The emails must be shown to have originated from the alleged sender.
The content must not be altered or tampered with.
The emails should be stored in a manner that preserves their integrity (e.g., through secure servers or proper archival systems).
The sender must have used a valid digital signature or any other form of electronic authentication if required.
In this case, the court would check whether the emails are properly authenticated and verified. If they meet the necessary standards, they would be admissible as evidence.
Case 2: Digital Transaction Records in Financial Disputes
Scenario: A financial institution is being sued for fraudulent transactions by a customer. The institution presents digital transaction logs, showing the customer’s approval for each transaction, along with timestamps.
Application of Section 246: In this case, digital records such as transaction logs, bank statements, and logs of financial transactions stored electronically would be admissible under Section 246.
The records must be generated, stored, and transmitted in a way that maintains their accuracy and authenticity.
If digital signatures or encryption techniques are used to secure the records, they can be further validated.
A reliable witness (e.g., someone with expertise in IT or banking systems) may be called to testify about the method of data storage and retrieval.
The court would accept these records as evidence, provided they meet the established standards of reliability.
Case 3: Audio and Video Recordings in Criminal Cases
Scenario: In a criminal case, a video recording of a suspect making a confession is presented as evidence. The defense claims that the video has been tampered with and is not reliable.
Application of Section 246: For audio and video recordings to be admissible:
The recording must be authenticated through metadata, timestamp information, and an unbroken chain of custody.
The equipment used to make the recording must be reliable, and the recorded material should be preserved in its original form, without tampering.
A technical expert may be called to testify about the integrity of the digital media.
If the recording is signed digitally or encoded in a way that ensures its authenticity, it can be admitted as evidence.
The court will evaluate whether the recording was tampered with or if its integrity is intact. If not tampered with, the court will accept the digital recording as evidence.
Case 4: Documents Stored in Cloud Services
Scenario: A company is in a dispute with a former employee over the theft of intellectual property. The company presents documents stored on a cloud service as evidence, claiming the former employee accessed confidential files without authorization.
Application of Section 246: The documents stored in a cloud service can be admissible under Section 246, provided:
The cloud service provider follows secure methods for storing data, including encryption and access control.
There is a clear audit trail, which can prove who accessed the documents and when.
The company provides evidence of the file's authenticity, ensuring that the document has not been altered since it was uploaded.
In this case, the court would examine the technical details of how the data was stored, accessed, and protected. The burden of proof lies on the company to show that the files are authentic and reliable.
Case 5: Digital Signatures on Contracts
Scenario: A company enters into an online agreement with a client, and the client disputes the validity of the contract, claiming they never signed it.
Application of Section 246: A digital signature is a form of electronic signature that is used to authenticate a document. Under Section 246, digital signatures are recognized as equivalent to traditional handwritten signatures, provided:
The digital signature is created using a valid, government-certified private key.
The authenticity of the digital signature can be verified by the public key infrastructure (PKI).
There is evidence that the signatory voluntarily signed the document (e.g., through an email confirming the intent to sign or IP tracking to confirm the signer's presence at the time of signing).
In this case, the court will examine whether the digital signature is valid, ensuring the contract's authenticity.
Case 6: Electronic Health Records in Medical Negligence
Scenario: A patient sues a hospital for medical negligence. The hospital presents the patient's electronic health records (EHR), showing all the treatments and procedures performed. The patient argues that these records are not authentic.
Application of Section 246: Electronic health records are increasingly used in medical practice. Under Section 246, they are admissible as long as:
The records are securely stored and maintained, ensuring data integrity.
The records are created and signed by authorized healthcare professionals.
The hospital provides a chain of custody, ensuring that the records were not altered or tampered with.
In this case, the court would verify whether the EHR system is reliable and tamper-proof, and whether the medical professionals involved followed the proper procedures when updating the records.
Key Principles Under Section 246:
Authentication and Integrity: The electronic records must be reliable, authenticated, and tamper-proof. This is usually ensured through the use of digital signatures, encryption, and secure storage methods.
Chain of Custody: For digital evidence (e.g., emails, digital contracts, video recordings), it is crucial to establish an unbroken chain of custody, ensuring that the evidence presented has not been altered or manipulated.
Expert Testimony: In many cases, an IT or forensic expert may be required to testify about the authenticity and integrity of the digital records.
Reliability of the System: The system or method used to store and transmit electronic records must be dependable and capable of preventing tampering.
These are a few case scenarios where Section 246 of the BSA, 2023 would be invoked to assess the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in various legal contexts. The focus is on the authenticity, integrity, and reliability of digital records, and the law ensures that such records are treated with the same level of scrutiny as traditional physical documents.
RELATED Blog
comments