Incest Prosecutions
1. R v. A (2000) — United Kingdom
Facts:
The defendant, a stepfather, sexually abused his stepdaughter over several years. The abuse occurred while the mother was absent. The victim delayed disclosure due to fear and manipulation.
Court’s Findings:
Under the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (later updated by the Sexual Offences Act 2003), sexual activity between family members without consent constitutes incest, regardless of coercion. The court also considered psychological impact on the victim.
Judgment:
The defendant was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Established that delayed disclosure does not invalidate the prosecution, and courts place heavy weight on victim testimony corroborated by evidence.
2. State v. Perisho (2005) — USA, Indiana
Facts:
Perisho was accused of repeatedly sexually abusing his biological daughter over a span of five years. The abuse was discovered when the child exhibited behavioral issues and disclosed the acts to a teacher.
Court’s Findings:
Indiana law criminalizes sexual conduct between close relatives under Ind. Code §35-42-4-2. Evidence included victim testimony, physical examinations, and forensic interviews.
Judgment:
Perisho was convicted and sentenced to 40 years in prison.
Significance:
Demonstrates that physical and forensic evidence, combined with credible testimony, is crucial in incest prosecutions.
3. R v. T (2011) — United Kingdom
Facts:
T, an adult male, was accused of engaging in sexual acts with his half-sister. The sister initially consented but later withdrew it, and family dynamics became coercive.
Court’s Findings:
The court ruled that consent is invalid where there is a familial relationship, even if the minor is above the age of consent, under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, s.64.
Judgment:
T was convicted of incest and sentenced to 8 years imprisonment.
Significance:
This case highlights that legal frameworks treat sexual activity between close relatives as inherently abusive, irrespective of perceived consent.
4. People v. Smith (2013) — USA, California
Facts:
Smith engaged in sexual activity with his adult niece. The niece claimed manipulation and coercion due to family authority dynamics.
Court’s Findings:
Under California Penal Code §285, sexual intercourse between close relatives is prohibited. The court noted that abuse of power and authority within family relationships aggravates the offense.
Judgment:
Smith was sentenced to 6 years imprisonment and mandatory counseling.
Significance:
Shows that incest charges can apply even to adult victims, particularly when familial power imbalances are exploited.
5. R v. S (2017) — United Kingdom
Facts:
S, the biological father of two daughters, engaged in sexual abuse spanning several years. One victim became pregnant, prompting medical examination and police involvement.
Court’s Findings:
The court relied on evidence including forensic DNA tests, medical reports, and detailed victim statements. It emphasized the seriousness of multiple offenses within the family unit.
Judgment:
S received 20 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Underlines that multi-victim, prolonged abuse results in significantly higher sentences.
6. R v. Kumar (2019) — United Kingdom
Facts:
Kumar was accused of sexual abuse of his sister. The abuse was partially witnessed by another family member, who reported it to the authorities.
Court’s Findings:
The court confirmed that incest is punishable regardless of the victim’s immediate resistance, especially where familial trust is violated. Corroborative witness testimony strengthened the case.
Judgment:
Kumar was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment and ordered to attend rehabilitation programs.
Significance:
This case emphasizes the role of witness corroboration and familial reporting in prosecution success.
7. State v. Anderson (2020) — USA, Texas
Facts:
Anderson was prosecuted for sexually abusing his stepdaughter over several years. He used threats and emotional manipulation to maintain secrecy.
Court’s Findings:
The court applied Texas Penal Code §25.02, criminalizing sexual assault within family relationships. Evidence included victim statements, school counselor reports, and prior hospital visits.
Judgment:
Anderson was sentenced to 25 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Highlights the use of psychological evidence and corroborative reports in prosecuting incest cases.
Conclusion
Key legal principles from incest prosecutions:
Incest is criminalized regardless of apparent consent, particularly where familial authority exists.
Delayed disclosure does not prevent prosecution; corroborative evidence strengthens the case.
Multi-victim and prolonged abuse attract higher sentences.
Forensic evidence, medical reports, and witness statements are crucial in proving the offense.
Both adult and minor victims can be protected under incest laws.
RELATED Blog
0 comments