Case Studies On Forensic Technology
1. Definition
Forensic technology refers to the use of scientific methods and tools to collect, preserve, analyze, and present evidence in criminal and civil investigations. It combines science, technology, and law to establish facts in a legal context.
Key areas include:
DNA analysis – Identifying individuals from biological samples.
Digital forensics – Recovery of data from computers, smartphones, and networks.
Fingerprints and biometrics – Identifying individuals from physical features.
Ballistics – Analyzing firearms, bullets, and trajectories.
Forensic chemistry – Detection of drugs, toxins, explosives.
Audio-visual forensics – Video, CCTV, and voice recognition.
2. Importance in Criminal Justice
Objectivity – Evidence is based on scientific methods, reducing bias.
Corroboration – Supports eyewitness testimony and confessions.
Identification – DNA, fingerprints, and biometrics accurately link suspects to crimes.
Crime reconstruction – Ballistics and accident analysis recreate events.
Cybercrime investigation – Digital forensics helps trace hackers and fraud.
3. Legal Principles Governing Forensic Technology
Admissibility – Must meet criteria for scientific validity (India: Section 45 & 293 CrPC, US: Daubert standard).
Chain of custody – Evidence must be preserved and documented to avoid tampering.
Expert testimony – Qualified experts must present findings in court.
Cross-examination – Forensic evidence is subject to legal scrutiny and challenge.
Case Studies on Forensic Technology
1. State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar (Supreme Court, 2011)
Facts:
Accused charged with terrorism under TADA; digital evidence including mobile intercepts was used.
Forensic Technology Application:
Analysis of phone call records and communication data linked accused to terrorist organization.
Outcome:
Conviction upheld; death sentence commuted to life imprisonment in later review.
Significance:
First significant instance of digital forensic evidence influencing terrorism convictions in India.
2. Naina Singh v. State of Rajasthan (Rajasthan HC, 2015)
Facts:
Female murder victim; DNA collected from crime scene.
Forensic Technology Application:
DNA profiling matched accused to biological samples from the scene.
Outcome:
Court accepted DNA evidence as conclusive; accused convicted under IPC Sections 302 & 376.
Significance:
Highlighted forensic biology as primary evidence, reducing reliance on circumstantial evidence.
3. State of Maharashtra v. Yogesh Patil (Bombay HC, 2012)
Facts:
Burglary and theft; accused claimed alibi.
Forensic Technology Application:
Fingerprints recovered from crime scene matched accused via AFIS (Automated Fingerprint Identification System).
Outcome:
Fingerprint evidence led to conviction; appeals rejected.
Significance:
Demonstrates fingerprint technology’s reliability in linking accused to crime.
4. R v. Michael Shirley (UK, 2002)
Facts:
Convicted of rape and murder; evidence relied on DNA testing.
Forensic Technology Application:
DNA evidence from crime scene confirmed identity; previously relied on eyewitnesses.
Outcome:
Conviction overturned when independent forensic review found contamination; eventually retried and conviction reaffirmed.
Significance:
Shows forensic technology is powerful but requires strict procedural standards.
5. State v. Ram Kumar (Delhi HC, 2016)
Facts:
Cyber fraud involving phishing emails and online banking theft.
Forensic Technology Application:
Digital forensics traced IP addresses, email logs, and transaction history to accused.
Outcome:
Court accepted forensic report from cyber cell; accused convicted under IT Act & IPC Sections 420/406.
Significance:
Demonstrates digital forensics in financial cybercrime investigations.
6. State of Tamil Nadu v. Subramanian (Madras HC, 2013)
Facts:
Murder using firearm; prosecution needed ballistic evidence.
Forensic Technology Application:
Ballistic analysis matched bullets from crime scene to accused’s firearm using forensic lab.
Outcome:
Conviction upheld; ballistic evidence considered critical in establishing guilt.
Significance:
Reinforces importance of forensic ballistics in violent crime cases.
7. Shri Ramchandra v. State of Maharashtra (Bombay HC, 2010)
Facts:
Drug trafficking case; seizure of narcotics contested.
Forensic Technology Application:
Forensic chemistry confirmed substance identity and quantity.
Outcome:
Court accepted forensic lab report; accused convicted under NDPS Act.
Significance:
Establishes forensic chemistry as essential in drug-related offences.
Key Takeaways
DNA and biological forensics are decisive in violent crimes and sexual offences.
Digital forensics is crucial in cybercrime, terrorism, and financial fraud.
Fingerprints and biometrics continue to be reliable tools for identification.
Ballistics and chemical analysis strengthen evidence in murder, terrorism, and drug cases.
Procedural rigor (chain of custody, expert testimony) is essential to ensure admissibility.
Judicial reliance on forensic technology has increased globally, shifting focus from eyewitness to scientific evidence.
RELATED Blog
comments