Alphabay Marketplace Prosecutions

🌐 What Was AlphaBay?

AlphaBay was a massive darknet marketplace launched in 2014, accessible via Tor, and considered the largest of its kind before it was shut down in July 2017.

It hosted illegal goods/services like:

Narcotics

Weapons

Malware & hacking tools

Fake IDs & documents

Stolen data (e.g., credit cards)

At its peak, it had over 400,000 users and facilitated billions in transactions, mainly in Bitcoin and Monero.

After its takedown, law enforcement tracked and prosecuted founders, administrators, and top vendors.

⚖️ Legal Framework for Prosecutions

Prosecutions related to AlphaBay involve charges under:

21 U.S.C. § 846 – Drug trafficking conspiracy

18 U.S.C. § 1956 – Money laundering

18 U.S.C. § 371 – General conspiracy

18 U.S.C. § 1030 – Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (for hacking tools/malware)

18 U.S.C. § 2320 – Trafficking in counterfeit goods

18 U.S.C. § 1960 – Operating an unlicensed money transmitting business

🧑‍⚖️ Key AlphaBay-Related Prosecution Cases (Detailed)

1. United States v. Alexandre Cazes (2017)

Facts:

Cazes, a Canadian national, was the founder and administrator of AlphaBay (under the alias “Alpha02”).

He was arrested in Thailand in July 2017, where authorities seized his assets and computers containing key evidence (server logs, passwords).

He died by suicide in Thai custody shortly after arrest.

Charges (filed before his death):

Conspiracy to engage in racketeering

Narcotics conspiracy

Identity theft

Access device fraud

Money laundering

Outcome:
Though Cazes died before trial, his arrest led to:

Seizure of AlphaBay infrastructure

Dozens of vendor prosecutions

Asset forfeiture proceedings for millions in cryptocurrency

Significance:
Cazes’ arrest ended AlphaBay and revealed how law enforcement could pierce the anonymity of darknet operators.

2. United States v. Gal Vallerius (aka “OxyMonster”) (2017–2018)

Facts:

Vallerius, a French national, was a top vendor and moderator on AlphaBay.

He was arrested in the U.S. while entering the country for a beard competition.

Authorities found his laptop unlocked, revealing the “OxyMonster” login and drug transaction logs.

Charges:

Conspiracy to distribute controlled substances

Conspiracy to launder money

Drug trafficking across borders

Outcome:

Pled guilty in 2018

Sentenced to 20 years in federal prison

Significance:
Demonstrated how careless operational security (like traveling with unlocked devices) led to arrest.

3. United States v. Bryan Connor Herrell (aka “Penissmith”) (2020)

Facts:

Herrell served as an AlphaBay moderator, resolving disputes between users and vendors.

He had access to user communications, transaction details, and vendor performance.

Charges:

Conspiracy to engage in a racketeer influenced corrupt organization (RICO) under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d)

Outcome:

Pled guilty

Sentenced to 11 years in federal prison

Significance:
First case where a marketplace moderator (not a vendor or admin) was held criminally liable under RICO.

4. United States v. Ronald Wheeler (aka “Trappy88”) (2019)

Facts:

Wheeler was a top-level AlphaBay drug vendor, specializing in fentanyl and counterfeit pills.

Used encrypted messaging and Bitcoin for transactions.

Charges:

Drug distribution

Possession with intent to distribute

Conspiracy

Money laundering

Outcome:

Convicted and sentenced to 25 years in federal prison.

Significance:
Highlighted the deadly impact of fentanyl sales through darknet platforms and the court’s harsh stance on such vendors.

5. United States v. Michael Weigand (aka “Shawn Shillinger”) (2020)

Facts:

Weigand helped Cazes conceal his identity and aided in running AlphaBay servers and moving money.

Provided false information to law enforcement during investigation.

Charges:

Obstruction of justice

Making false statements

Conspiracy to commit access device fraud

Outcome:

Pled guilty

Sentenced to 8 years in prison

Significance:
Showed that even technical or logistical support for darknet markets can result in serious federal charges.

6. United States v. Aamodt (2021)

Facts:

Aamodt was a U.S.-based vendor selling counterfeit prescription medications including OxyContin and Xanax.

Operated under multiple usernames and routed payments through cryptocurrency mixers.

Charges:

Counterfeit drug trafficking

Mail and wire fraud

Conspiracy

Money laundering

Outcome:

Convicted after trial

Sentenced to 17 years in prison

Significance:
One of the few jury trials stemming from AlphaBay-related drug sales.

📌 Summary of Legal Lessons from AlphaBay Prosecutions

Legal IssueExplanation
RICO ChargesApplied to AlphaBay admins/moderators as participants in organized criminal enterprise.
Crypto ForensicsBlockchain analysis allowed tracing of Bitcoin/Monero transactions to suspects.
Operational SecurityPoor OPSEC (e.g., using same usernames, carrying devices, lack of encryption) led to many arrests.
International CooperationArrests occurred in Thailand, France, Canada, and others—highlighting global reach.
Moderator LiabilityEven non-selling roles (like resolving disputes) led to criminal prosecution.
User Data SeizuresServer data seized from AlphaBay helped identify thousands of users and vendors.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments