Diploma Mill Prosecutions In Usa
1. ✅ What is a Diploma Mill?
A diploma mill is a fraudulent organization that issues degrees, diplomas, or certificates for a fee without requiring substantial academic achievement or study. These operations often:
Claim to be legitimate educational institutions.
Sell degrees based on “life experience.”
Falsely assert accreditation.
Target professionals seeking credentials without effort.
2. ⚖️ Legal Framework for Prosecution
Federal and State Laws Used:
Wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343)
Mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341)
False claims or statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001)
Conspiracy statutes (18 U.S.C. § 371)
Misuse of educational records or identity theft
State-level consumer protection and fraud laws
Agencies Involved:
FBI
U.S. Department of Education (DOE)
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
State Attorneys General
3. Key Elements of Prosecution
To prosecute a diploma mill, the government must often prove:
The institution had no legitimate academic program.
Defendants intended to defraud students or employers.
The operation used interstate commerce (mail, phone, web).
There was material deception regarding accreditation or curriculum.
4. 🔍 Case Law Examples
Case 1: United States v. Axact (U.S. District Court, 2016–2019)
Jurisdiction: Multiple states (federal case)
Facts:
Axact, a Pakistani-based tech company, operated hundreds of fake online universities targeting U.S. consumers. It issued thousands of fake diplomas in return for payments ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars.
Held:
The DOJ prosecuted multiple individuals under wire fraud and conspiracy charges. U.S. federal courts issued orders to seize domains, freeze assets, and convict participants.
Significance:
One of the largest diploma mill prosecutions globally, with strong international coordination. Demonstrates global reach and severity of fake academic credentials.
Case 2: United States v. Belford and Stockton (St. Regis University Case, 2006–2009)
Jurisdiction: Eastern District of Washington
Facts:
St. Regis University was a fake online university that issued over 10,000 fake degrees, including to federal employees and military personnel. The defendants used a fictitious accrediting agency and collected over $7 million in fees.
Held:
Both operators were convicted of wire fraud, mail fraud, and conspiracy, sentenced to prison, and ordered to pay restitution.
Significance:
This case showed how diploma mills infiltrated government and defense sectors and led to stricter federal policies on verifying credentials.
Case 3: United States v. Diversified Educational Resources, Inc. (LaSalle University Case, 1996)
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Facts:
LaSalle University, run by Thomas James Kirk, operated as a diploma mill in Louisiana. It issued fake degrees under the guise of religious exemption and claimed accreditation.
Held:
Kirk pleaded guilty to mail fraud and tax evasion, receiving a five-year prison sentence. The IRS also pursued back taxes and penalties.
Significance:
The court stressed that religious or nontraditional institutions are not above academic fraud laws. One of the first major diploma mill crackdowns in the U.S.
Case 4: United States v. Rutherford (2004)
Jurisdiction: Texas
Facts:
The defendant sold fake degrees from “James Monroe University,” used by customers to seek promotions, licenses, and employment.
Held:
Convicted under mail fraud and false statements, with the court emphasizing the harm caused by unqualified individuals gaining access to sensitive jobs.
Significance:
Highlighted risks of diploma mills in public safety and regulated professions, such as teaching and nursing.
Case 5: United States v. Johnson (2008)
Jurisdiction: Alabama
Facts:
An individual created a fake university called “Jefferson University” and sold thousands of degrees over the internet. He posed as a legitimate educator and created false accreditation credentials.
Held:
The court convicted him of conspiracy to defraud and false claims, sentencing him to several years in prison and asset forfeiture.
Significance:
Shows the danger of false accreditation bodies used to deceive regulators and customers.
Case 6: United States v. Riccardi (Federal District Court, 2012)
Jurisdiction: New York
Facts:
Riccardi was a state employee who used a diploma mill degree from “Concordia College and University” to receive a salary increase and promotion.
Held:
Charged with fraud and theft of public funds, as the degree was determined to be bogus.
Significance:
Demonstrates that users of diploma mill degrees, not just operators, can also be prosecuted—especially in government positions.
5. Legal Themes and Outcomes
Courts reject the defense of “life experience degrees” when no coursework is performed.
Use of a fake degree for employment, licensing, or salary enhancement often leads to charges of fraud, theft, or false statements.
Conspiracies involving fake accreditation are often prosecuted alongside the core diploma mill scheme.
Some states (e.g., Oregon, Texas, and Washington) have passed specific diploma mill statutes making even possession or use of such degrees illegal.
6. Conclusion
Diploma mills are prosecuted aggressively in the U.S. using federal fraud statutes. Courts have held both operators and users accountable, especially when the use of such degrees endangers public trust, safety, or results in financial gain. The precedent from these cases has also pushed for better credential verification standards across government and industry.
RELATED Blog
0 comments