Cyberbullying Prosecution
What is Cyberbullying?
Cyberbullying refers to the use of electronic communication tools—such as social media, text messages, emails, and websites—to harass, threaten, humiliate, or intimidate a person, especially repeatedly.
Legal Framework
Cyberbullying is prosecuted under various laws, often involving:
Harassment and stalking statutes
Defamation laws
Criminal intimidation
Electronic communication and IT laws
Child protection and anti-bullying laws
The prosecution generally must prove that the accused intended to cause distress or harm through repeated or severe conduct.
Elements Typically Required for Prosecution:
Use of electronic means to send harmful or threatening messages.
Intent to harass, intimidate, or cause emotional distress.
Repeated conduct or a single severe act.
Actual harm or reasonable apprehension caused to the victim.
Important Case Laws on Cyberbullying Prosecution
1. People v. Marquan M. (New York, USA, 2014)
Facts: Marquan M. created a fake Facebook profile to harass a high school classmate, posting insulting and threatening messages.
Legal Issue: Whether cyberbullying falls under harassment laws.
Ruling: The court upheld conviction under harassment and cyberbullying statutes.
Significance: Established precedent that online harassment is prosecutable under traditional harassment laws adapted to cyber contexts.
2. State v. Bishop (Washington, USA, 2012)
Facts: The accused sent threatening messages via social media and texts to intimidate a former partner.
Legal Issue: Criminal harassment through electronic communication.
Ruling: The court convicted Bishop, emphasizing that threats and repeated messages over electronic platforms constitute harassment.
Significance: Affirmed that cyberbullying and cyberstalking are punishable under harassment statutes.
3. R. v. D.J. (Canada, 2016)
Facts: A teenager sent threatening and humiliating messages via social media to a classmate.
Legal Issue: Application of criminal harassment provisions to online conduct.
Ruling: The court found the accused guilty of criminal harassment.
Significance: Highlighted that the anonymity of online actions does not protect from prosecution.
4. R v. McInerney (UK, 2018)
Facts: McInerney was prosecuted for sending repeated abusive and threatening tweets to a woman.
Legal Issue: Use of electronic communication to cause distress.
Ruling: The court convicted McInerney under the Communications Act 2003.
Significance: Clarified that repeated online abuse meets the threshold for criminal behavior.
5. State v. Lori Drew (Missouri, USA, 2008)
Facts: Lori Drew created a fake MySpace profile to cyberbully a teenager who later committed suicide.
Legal Issue: Whether cyberbullying could be prosecuted under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
Ruling: Drew was acquitted of felony charges but convicted of misdemeanor violations.
Significance: The case triggered calls for specific cyberbullying laws; highlighted gaps in existing laws to handle cyberbullying effectively.
6. People v. Xavier (California, USA, 2017)
Facts: Xavier repeatedly sent threatening texts and social media messages to a former girlfriend.
Legal Issue: Cyberstalking and harassment via electronic means.
Ruling: Convicted under California Penal Code sections relating to stalking and electronic harassment.
Significance: Reinforced the applicability of stalking laws to online conduct.
7. The Queen v. Karmel (Australia, 2015)
Facts: Karmel sent abusive messages via social media to a co-worker, causing psychological harm.
Legal Issue: Cyberbullying as criminal intimidation.
Ruling: Court held Karmel criminally liable for intimidation and harassment.
Significance: Demonstrated Australian courts’ approach to punishing cyberbullying under intimidation laws.
Summary Table of Cyberbullying Prosecution Cases
| Case Name | Jurisdiction | Key Legal Issue | Outcome/Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| People v. Marquan M. | USA (NY) | Cyber harassment | Upheld conviction for online harassment |
| State v. Bishop | USA (WA) | Electronic communication harassment | Convicted for repeated threatening messages |
| R. v. D.J. | Canada | Criminal harassment online | Convicted despite online anonymity |
| R v. McInerney | UK | Electronic communication abuse | Convicted under Communications Act |
| State v. Lori Drew | USA (MO) | Cyberbullying & fraud | Misdemeanor conviction; exposed legal gaps |
| People v. Xavier | USA (CA) | Cyberstalking and harassment | Convicted under stalking laws |
| The Queen v. Karmel | Australia | Criminal intimidation | Convicted for cyberbullying and intimidation |
Key Takeaways
Cyberbullying is punishable under various laws including harassment, stalking, intimidation, and electronic communication statutes.
Courts require proof of intent to harass or intimidate and repeated or severe conduct.
The anonymity or online nature of bullying does not shield the accused from prosecution.
Legal gaps still exist in some jurisdictions, prompting calls for specific cyberbullying legislation.
Medical and psychological evidence of harm often strengthens the prosecution’s case.
RELATED Blog
0 comments