Drug Sales Via Internet Prosecutions
DRUG SALES VIA INTERNET – PROSECUTIONS AND CASE LAW
Internet drug sales involve the illegal distribution of controlled substances using digital platforms such as websites, social media, messaging apps, or dark web marketplaces.
In Finland, prosecutions are based on:
Narcotics Drugs Act (1961, amended) – regulates illegal possession, sale, and distribution of controlled substances.
Criminal Code of Finland – Sections on organized crime, fraud, and money laundering often apply to online drug networks.
Cybercrime provisions (Ch. 38, Criminal Code) – for illegal use of IT systems in drug trafficking.
Globally, cyber drug sales are prosecuted under similar frameworks, often integrating drug control law with cybercrime statutes.
CASE LAW ANALYSIS
1️⃣ Finland: R v. Anonymous Online Drug Vendor (Helsinki District Court, 2015)
Facts:
Individual sold cannabis and prescription drugs via encrypted messaging apps.
Payments were received in cryptocurrencies.
Charges:
Illegal sale of narcotics (Narcotics Act)
Use of IT networks for illegal purposes (Criminal Code Ch. 38)
Judgment:
Convicted and sentenced to 2 years imprisonment.
Confiscation of cryptocurrency and devices.
Significance:
First Finnish case linking cryptocurrency payments and darknet drug sales to criminal conviction.
Courts treated online distribution as equivalent to street-level sales in terms of severity.
2️⃣ Finland: R v. “DarkNet MDMA Seller” (Turku District Court, 2016)
Facts:
Defendant operated a website selling MDMA.
Shipments were disguised in legitimate parcels to avoid detection.
Charges:
Narcotics trafficking (Narcotics Act, Sections 4 and 6)
Concealment of illegal activity via IT systems
Judgment:
Sentenced to 3 years imprisonment for aggravated drug trafficking.
Court emphasized organized activity and use of IT systems as aggravating factors.
Significance:
Finnish courts treat online trafficking as organized crime if volume and planning are substantial.
Packaging methods and evasion techniques increase sentence severity.
3️⃣ International Case: Silk Road Marketplace (U.S. Federal Court, 2015)
Facts:
Ross Ulbricht operated Silk Road, a dark web marketplace selling drugs globally.
Bitcoin used as payment; anonymizing tools to conceal identities.
Charges:
Conspiracy to traffic narcotics
Money laundering
Computer hacking and identity fraud
Judgment:
Life imprisonment without parole.
Seizure of all digital assets and servers.
Significance:
Demonstrates global legal principle: online drug sales plus digital anonymity and cryptocurrency = serious criminal penalties.
Influenced Finnish prosecutors’ approach to darknet drug sales.
4️⃣ Finland: Helsinki Police vs. Prescription Drug Dealer Online (2017)
Facts:
Seller distributed prescription opioids via social media and private messaging.
Customers were adults across Finland.
Charges:
Unlicensed sale of prescription drugs
Narcotics Act violations
Use of IT systems for criminal activity
Judgment:
Convicted and sentenced to 2.5 years imprisonment.
Court noted online platforms facilitate wider distribution, increasing the harm factor.
Significance:
Finnish courts recognize digital tools amplify the risk of drug distribution.
Online sales of prescription medications treated equivalently to street-level trafficking.
5️⃣ Finland: Drug Trafficking via Telegram (2020)
Facts:
Group used Telegram channels to advertise and sell cannabis and synthetic drugs.
Encrypted messages coordinated shipments and payments via cryptocurrency.
Charges:
Narcotics trafficking
Conspiracy
Use of digital networks for criminal purposes
Judgment:
All four members convicted.
Sentences ranged 2–4 years imprisonment, confiscation of phones and crypto wallets.
Significance:
Emphasizes coordination through messaging apps as evidence of organized crime.
Courts recognize online platforms as aggravating factor in sentencing.
6️⃣ European Case: Netherlands v. Online Cocaine Dealer (2018)
Facts:
Individual sold cocaine via dark web.
Used Tor network and Bitcoin to avoid detection.
Charges:
Drug trafficking
Money laundering
Judgment:
Sentenced to 4 years imprisonment; digital devices and crypto funds confiscated.
Significance:
Mirrors Finnish legal approach: digital anonymity and cryptocurrency do not prevent criminal liability.
Cross-border implications are significant for EU law enforcement.
7️⃣ Finland: Espoo District Court – Synthetic Drugs Online Sales (2021)
Facts:
Defendant sold synthetic cannabinoids via social media and dark web marketplaces.
Charges:
Narcotics Act – trafficking
Use of IT systems to commit a crime
Conspiracy with multiple accomplices
Judgment:
Convicted; sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.
Court emphasized that digital facilitation increased the harm and reach.
Significance:
Reinforces principle: use of internet platforms = aggravating factor in sentencing.
KEY LEGAL PRINCIPLES FROM INTERNET DRUG SALES CASES
Online drug sales = same legal liability as street-level trafficking.
Use of encryption, cryptocurrency, or darknet markets aggravates penalties.
Multiple accomplices and coordinated networks can lead to organized crime charges.
Insider technical knowledge (servers, IT infrastructure) increases culpability.
Digital forensics is central to gathering evidence (logs, blockchain tracing, devices).
Sentences in Finland typically range 2–4 years; aggravated trafficking may go higher.
Cross-border and EU law enforcement cooperation is crucial for prosecution.
CONCLUSION
Finland prosecutes drug sales via internet with severity, especially when cryptocurrencies, darknet platforms, or encrypted messaging are involved.
Courts treat online trafficking as organized and premeditated, often resulting in longer sentences than street-level sales.
Key evidence comes from digital forensic investigations, blockchain tracing, and online communications.
International cases like Silk Road influence Finnish approaches to online narcotics enforcement.
RELATED Blog
comments