Social Media Posts As Documentary Evidence
What is Documentary Evidence?
Documentary evidence refers to any written or recorded material presented to prove facts in a case. Traditionally, this included letters, contracts, photographs, official records, etc.
Social Media Posts as Documentary Evidence
Social media posts (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, WhatsApp messages, blogs, etc.) are considered digital documentary evidence.
These posts can include text, images, videos, or audio, and are increasingly relevant in criminal and civil litigation.
They can prove facts such as admissions, threats, character, intent, or any relevant circumstances.
However, authenticity, reliability, and integrity of such evidence must be established.
Legal Challenges
Verifying the authorship of posts.
Proving the originality and preventing tampering.
Establishing that the content has not been manipulated.
Jurisdictional challenges (where was the content posted and accessed).
Compliance with data protection and privacy laws.
Relevant Laws in India:
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (especially Sections 65A and 65B, which deal with electronic records and their admissibility).
Information Technology Act, 2000.
Rules governing digital evidence collection and preservation.
Case Law Analysis on Social Media Posts as Documentary Evidence
1. Anvar P.V. vs. P.K. Basheer & Others (2014)
Citation: (2014) 10 SCC 473
Key Points:
The Supreme Court laid down strict guidelines for the admissibility of electronic evidence, including social media posts.
It held that electronic records must comply with Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, which requires a certificate of authenticity for such evidence.
The Court emphasized that without such a certificate, electronic evidence cannot be admitted.
Significance: Established mandatory compliance with procedural safeguards for electronic evidence, including social media content.
2. State of Maharashtra vs. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003)
Citation: AIR 2003 SC 40
Key Points:
Though predating the widespread use of social media, this case laid the foundation for the appreciation of electronic evidence in courts.
The Court recognized the validity of electronic records and stated that the authenticity and reliability must be examined carefully.
This case indirectly supports the inclusion of digital content such as social media posts under electronic evidence.
Significance: Early recognition of electronic evidence in Indian law.
3. Satnam Singh vs. State of Punjab (2018)
Citation: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Key Points:
The court accepted WhatsApp messages and Facebook posts as documentary evidence after establishing their authenticity through metadata and other technical verification.
It emphasized the importance of expert testimony in proving the genuineness of such social media content.
The judgment noted that social media content can reveal intent, motive, or link accused to the crime.
Significance: Validates social media content as reliable evidence when properly authenticated.
4. State of Telangana vs. Shaik Allaudin (2019)
Citation: Telangana High Court
Key Points:
The Court admitted Facebook posts as evidence in a defamation case.
It held that posts made on social media platforms accessible to the public are documentary evidence and can be used to prove the charge.
The court also emphasized the need to safeguard the accused’s rights by ensuring the evidence is genuine.
Significance: Established public social media content as admissible evidence in defamation and similar civil matters.
5. Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2019)
Citation: (2019) 9 SCC 1
Key Points:
This landmark judgment acknowledged the admissibility of electronic evidence, including social media records, subject to strict proof of authenticity.
The Court explained that social media evidence, like any electronic record, needs to comply with Sections 65A and 65B of the Evidence Act.
It recognized social media content’s evidentiary value in both civil and criminal cases.
Significance: Reinforced the procedural safeguards necessary for social media evidence.
6. Vikas Dubey vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020)
Citation: UP High Court
Key Points:
The Court considered social media posts, including videos and Facebook status updates, in assessing the accused’s involvement and motive in a criminal case.
The judgment highlighted how social media content can provide contemporaneous evidence of an accused’s state of mind or actions.
This helped the court establish circumstantial evidence and corroborate witness statements.
Significance: Demonstrates the powerful role social media plays in criminal investigations and trials.
Summary
Social media posts are increasingly accepted as documentary evidence if their authenticity and integrity are properly established.
Sections 65A and 65B of the Indian Evidence Act provide the framework for admissibility of electronic records.
Courts require proper certification, expert verification, and chain of custody proof for social media evidence.
Social media evidence can prove motive, intent, admissions, threats, or even alibis.
Courts balance admissibility with protection against tampering or false evidence.
RELATED Blog
0 comments