Medicare And Medicaid Fraud Landmark Cases
Overview: Medicare and Medicaid Fraud
Medicare and Medicaid are federal and state healthcare programs that provide medical benefits to the elderly, disabled, and low-income individuals. Fraud occurs when providers, patients, or others submit false claims or engage in deceptive practices to obtain unauthorized payments.
Common types of fraud include:
Billing for services not rendered
Upcoding or overbilling
Kickbacks or illegal referral fees
Falsifying patient records
Unnecessary medical procedures
The False Claims Act (FCA), Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), and Stark Law are key statutes used to prosecute Medicare and Medicaid fraud.
Landmark Medicare and Medicaid Fraud Cases
1. United States ex rel. Franklin v. Parke-Davis (2004)
Facts:
The pharmaceutical company Parke-Davis promoted the drug Neurontin for off-label uses not approved by the FDA, leading to false claims submitted to Medicare/Medicaid.
Legal Issue:
Can off-label marketing leading to false Medicare claims violate the False Claims Act?
Holding:
Yes. The court allowed the FCA claim, finding that fraudulent marketing causing false claims was actionable.
Significance:
Expanded the scope of FCA to cover off-label drug marketing that results in false Medicare claims.
2. United States v. Bayou Shores SNF, LLC (2014)
Facts:
A nursing home submitted false claims to Medicare for unnecessary rehabilitation therapy services.
Legal Issue:
Were the claims for therapy medically necessary and properly documented?
Holding:
The court found the nursing home liable under the FCA for submitting fraudulent claims.
Significance:
Emphasized the importance of medical necessity and documentation for Medicare billing.
3. United States ex rel. Escobar v. Universal Health Services, Inc. (2016)
Facts:
Universal Health Services submitted claims to Medicaid for services rendered by unlicensed staff.
Legal Issue:
Does submitting claims with implied false certifications violate the FCA?
Holding:
Yes. The Supreme Court ruled that implied false certification of compliance with program requirements can trigger FCA liability if the condition is material to payment.
Significance:
Clarified that false certifications need not be explicit; implied violations affecting payment are actionable.
4. United States v. Omnicare, Inc. (2014)
Facts:
Omnicare paid kickbacks to nursing homes in exchange for drug purchasing referrals reimbursed by Medicare/Medicaid.
Legal Issue:
Did the kickbacks violate the Anti-Kickback Statute?
Holding:
Yes. The company entered a settlement agreeing to pay penalties.
Significance:
Reinforced strict enforcement of the AKS to prevent corrupt referral schemes.
5. United States v. AseraCare Inc. (2015)
Facts:
Hospice provider AseraCare allegedly submitted false claims for hospice care that was not medically necessary.
Legal Issue:
Were claims for hospice care fraudulent due to lack of medical necessity?
Holding:
AseraCare agreed to pay millions in settlement to resolve FCA allegations.
Significance:
Highlighted scrutiny on hospice and home health claims for fraud.
6. United States v. Tenet Healthcare Corp. (2006)
Facts:
Tenet Healthcare was accused of inflating Medicare billings by charging for unnecessary tests and procedures.
Legal Issue:
Did Tenet violate FCA by submitting false claims?
Holding:
Tenet agreed to pay a large settlement without admitting liability.
Significance:
One of the largest healthcare fraud settlements at the time, showing government commitment to combating large-scale fraud.
7. United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess (1943) (Historical Landmark)
Facts:
Contractors submitted fraudulent claims for construction projects funded by the government, an early use of the False Claims Act.
Significance:
Though not Medicare-specific, this case is foundational in FCA jurisprudence that applies to healthcare fraud today.
Summary Table
| Case | Year | Fraud Type | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franklin v. Parke-Davis | 2004 | Off-label drug marketing | FCA claim allowed | FCA covers off-label marketing-induced claims |
| Bayou Shores SNF, LLC | 2014 | Unnecessary therapy services | Liability under FCA | Importance of medical necessity and documentation |
| Escobar v. Universal | 2016 | Implied false certifications | FCA liability for implied false certification | Broadened FCA scope on implied false certification |
| Omnicare, Inc. | 2014 | Kickbacks | Settlement | Anti-Kickback enforcement |
| AseraCare Inc. | 2015 | Hospice care unnecessary claims | Settlement | Scrutiny of hospice claims |
| Tenet Healthcare Corp. | 2006 | Inflated billings | Settlement | Large-scale healthcare fraud enforcement |
| Marcus v. Hess | 1943 | Early FCA fraud precedent | Landmark FCA application | Foundation for FCA use in healthcare fraud |
Key Takeaways
The False Claims Act is the primary tool to combat Medicare and Medicaid fraud.
Implied false certifications underlie many fraud prosecutions.
Kickbacks and referral schemes are aggressively prosecuted under the Anti-Kickback Statute.
Large healthcare providers face high risks of FCA actions for billing irregularities.
Settlements often involve multi-million dollar penalties.
Courts require proof of medical necessity, proper documentation, and adherence to program rules.
RELATED Blog
0 comments